{"title":"La protección a los seres sintientes y la personalización jurídica de la naturaleza aportes desde el constitucionalismo colombiano","authors":"Juan Pablo Sarmiento E.","doi":"10.4067/s0718-52002020000200221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, various legal experiences have identified and enriched the protection of animals by recognizing them as sentient beings, and of nature, subjecting fundamental rights in it. However, in this article it is argued that, despite the relevance of the legal protection of nature, biodiversity and living beings, it is not really an extension of the charter of constitutional rights to those who have no voice; It is a repeated legal position around ecological protection, which seems to have been operated in different countries, with dissimilar legal categories, but identical functions, and in fact, embody structural sentences with complex orders of protection. Likewise, it is argued that the protection of sentient beings and ecosystems is still a legal problem without an autonomous solution, control in all cases, of the bond of the fundamental rights of human beings.","PeriodicalId":39109,"journal":{"name":"Estudios Constitucionales","volume":"18 1","pages":"221-264"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estudios Constitucionales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-52002020000200221","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In recent years, various legal experiences have identified and enriched the protection of animals by recognizing them as sentient beings, and of nature, subjecting fundamental rights in it. However, in this article it is argued that, despite the relevance of the legal protection of nature, biodiversity and living beings, it is not really an extension of the charter of constitutional rights to those who have no voice; It is a repeated legal position around ecological protection, which seems to have been operated in different countries, with dissimilar legal categories, but identical functions, and in fact, embody structural sentences with complex orders of protection. Likewise, it is argued that the protection of sentient beings and ecosystems is still a legal problem without an autonomous solution, control in all cases, of the bond of the fundamental rights of human beings.