Introduction: Translating Globalization, World Society and Modernity in Everyday Life – Theroretical Reflections and Empirical Perspectives

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 Q4 Social Sciences
Sociologus Pub Date : 2012-11-27 DOI:10.3790/SOC.62.1.1
Dieter Neubert, Antje Daniel
{"title":"Introduction: Translating Globalization, World Society and Modernity in Everyday Life – Theroretical Reflections and Empirical Perspectives","authors":"Dieter Neubert, Antje Daniel","doi":"10.3790/SOC.62.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Discussions of globalization, world society and modernity are part and parcel of current social science. Why should we present yet another publication on these topics? A simple reason is that these debates are still going on, and new contributions sometimes emerge under new headings. More important is the observation that the debates tend to separate the two elements of the structure-agency nexus and often do not link empirical research to conceptual discussions. The theoretical debates on globalization, world society and modernity which analyse fundamental structural changes often lack detailed empirical grounding and fail to reflect processes in everyday life, even when they theoretically acknowledge the importance of agency. Studies in social anthropology and in wide areas of development sociology focus on the agency aspect. They attach importance to detailed descriptions and tend to neglect further conceptualization. The fundamental structural changes associated with globalization, world society and modernity often seem to be of little interest and are at best considered to be general conditions for everyday life without further analysis. We highly value all studies of everyday life, but we want to remind the reader that processes in everyday life can only be fully understood with reference to the fundamental changes which gave birth to modern social science in the nineteenth century and which are still the driving forces behind social science today.","PeriodicalId":42778,"journal":{"name":"Sociologus","volume":"62 1","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3790/SOC.62.1.1","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociologus","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/SOC.62.1.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Discussions of globalization, world society and modernity are part and parcel of current social science. Why should we present yet another publication on these topics? A simple reason is that these debates are still going on, and new contributions sometimes emerge under new headings. More important is the observation that the debates tend to separate the two elements of the structure-agency nexus and often do not link empirical research to conceptual discussions. The theoretical debates on globalization, world society and modernity which analyse fundamental structural changes often lack detailed empirical grounding and fail to reflect processes in everyday life, even when they theoretically acknowledge the importance of agency. Studies in social anthropology and in wide areas of development sociology focus on the agency aspect. They attach importance to detailed descriptions and tend to neglect further conceptualization. The fundamental structural changes associated with globalization, world society and modernity often seem to be of little interest and are at best considered to be general conditions for everyday life without further analysis. We highly value all studies of everyday life, but we want to remind the reader that processes in everyday life can only be fully understood with reference to the fundamental changes which gave birth to modern social science in the nineteenth century and which are still the driving forces behind social science today.
导论:翻译日常生活中的全球化、世界社会和现代性——理论反思和实证观点
关于全球化、世界社会和现代性的讨论是当前社会科学的重要组成部分。为什么我们要发表另一份关于这些主题的出版物呢?一个简单的原因是,这些争论仍在继续,新的贡献有时会在新的标题下出现。更重要的是观察到辩论倾向于分离结构-代理关系的两个要素,并且经常没有将实证研究与概念讨论联系起来。关于全球化、世界社会和现代性的理论辩论分析了基本的结构变化,往往缺乏详细的经验基础,即使在理论上承认代理的重要性时,也未能反映日常生活中的过程。社会人类学和发展社会学广泛领域的研究集中在代理方面。他们重视详细的描述,往往忽视进一步的概念化。与全球化、世界社会和现代化有关的基本结构变化似乎往往不引起人们的兴趣,最多被认为是日常生活的一般情况,而不作进一步分析。我们高度重视对日常生活的所有研究,但我们想提醒读者,日常生活的过程只能通过参考19世纪产生现代社会科学的基本变化来充分理解,这些变化仍然是今天社会科学背后的推动力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sociologus
Sociologus Multiple-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信