Restoration sites on the Californian coast have different ecological histories that can influence restoration success

Q4 Environmental Science
E. Buisson, T. Dutoit
{"title":"Restoration sites on the Californian coast have different ecological histories that can influence restoration success","authors":"E. Buisson, T. Dutoit","doi":"10.3406/ecmed.2022.2139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For each restoration project, it is essential to define a reference ecosystem towards which ecological restoration aims. Historical information may be useful in the construction of the reference model and in finding out about the type and degree of disturbances that have caused degradation on the site, as legacies of past human land-uses have been shown to be major determinants of vegetation and plant diversity even in the very long term. The aim of this paper is the retrace the history of three sites where restoration protocols were tested, to better apprehend the potential reference ecosystems as well as the disturbances that degraded them. To do so, we first compiled information on the reference ecosystems at the landscape scale. Then, we compiled historical and agricultural information at the scale of the sites from local historical documents, historical reviews and aerial photographs. The three sites most likely were grasslands or oak savannas before European settlement. Grasslands used to cover 8.9 million ha in California. They were species-rich grasslands managed with fire by the native people and grazed by native ungulates. Early settlers introduced cattle grazing and changed fire regimes. Later on, many grasslands were converted to cultivation. All three sites were used for ranching and sometimes overgrazed. At least two of them were cultivated, probably leading to restoration being harder there, as plowing eliminates perennial species, destroys the seedbank, changes soil characteristics.","PeriodicalId":37547,"journal":{"name":"Ecologia Mediterranea","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecologia Mediterranea","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3406/ecmed.2022.2139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

For each restoration project, it is essential to define a reference ecosystem towards which ecological restoration aims. Historical information may be useful in the construction of the reference model and in finding out about the type and degree of disturbances that have caused degradation on the site, as legacies of past human land-uses have been shown to be major determinants of vegetation and plant diversity even in the very long term. The aim of this paper is the retrace the history of three sites where restoration protocols were tested, to better apprehend the potential reference ecosystems as well as the disturbances that degraded them. To do so, we first compiled information on the reference ecosystems at the landscape scale. Then, we compiled historical and agricultural information at the scale of the sites from local historical documents, historical reviews and aerial photographs. The three sites most likely were grasslands or oak savannas before European settlement. Grasslands used to cover 8.9 million ha in California. They were species-rich grasslands managed with fire by the native people and grazed by native ungulates. Early settlers introduced cattle grazing and changed fire regimes. Later on, many grasslands were converted to cultivation. All three sites were used for ranching and sometimes overgrazed. At least two of them were cultivated, probably leading to restoration being harder there, as plowing eliminates perennial species, destroys the seedbank, changes soil characteristics.
加州海岸的修复地点有不同的生态历史,可以影响修复的成功
对于每一个恢复项目,定义一个参考生态系统是至关重要的。历史资料在建立参考模型和查明造成该地点退化的干扰的类型和程度方面可能是有用的,因为过去人类土地利用的遗产已被证明是植被和植物多样性的主要决定因素,即使在很长时间内也是如此。本文的目的是追溯三个测试恢复方案的地点的历史,以更好地理解潜在的参考生态系统以及使它们退化的干扰。为此,我们首先在景观尺度上收集了参考生态系统的信息。然后,我们从当地的历史文献、历史评论和航空照片中整理了遗址规模的历史和农业信息。这三个地点最有可能是欧洲人定居之前的草原或橡树稀树草原。加州曾经有890万公顷的草地。它们是物种丰富的草原,由当地人用火管理,由当地的有蹄类动物放牧。早期的定居者引进了放牧并改变了火灾制度。后来,许多草原被改作耕地。这三个地点都被用作牧场,有时被过度放牧。其中至少有两种是人工种植的,可能导致那里的恢复更加困难,因为耕作消除了多年生物种,破坏了种子库,改变了土壤特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecologia Mediterranea
Ecologia Mediterranea Environmental Science-Ecology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: ecologia mediterranea publie des articles de recherche originaux sur des sujets se rapportant à l’écologie fondamentale ou appliquée des régions méditerranéennes. La revue exclut les articles purement descriptifs ou de systématique. ecologia mediterranea peut publier des études plus descriptives si elles apportent des connaissances approfondies d’intérêt général pour les écologues. ecologia mediterranea privilégie les domaines scientifiques suivants : bioclimatologie, biogéographie, biologie de la conservation, biologie marine, biologie des populations, écologie des communautés, écologie forestière, écologie génétique, écologie marine, écologie microbienne, écologie du paysage, écologie de la restauration, écologie végétale et animale, écophysiologie, paléoclimatologie, paléoécologie. La revue accepte également des articles de synthèse, des notes / communications courtes, des comptes-rendus d’ouvrages, des résumés de thèse, ainsi que des commentaires sur les articles récemment parus dans ecologia mediterranea . La revue publie aussi des actes de colloques faisant l’objet d’un numéro spécial. Dans ce cas, prendre contact avec les éditrices.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信