An evaluation of a shoulder rehabilitation class in a UK hospital following evidence-based modifications

IF 0.4 Q4 REHABILITATION
Emily Kell, J. Hammond, S. Andrews, Christina Germeni, Helen Hingston, Saifur Khan, Gemma Shearer, Sophie Weeks
{"title":"An evaluation of a shoulder rehabilitation class in a UK hospital following evidence-based modifications","authors":"Emily Kell, J. Hammond, S. Andrews, Christina Germeni, Helen Hingston, Saifur Khan, Gemma Shearer, Sophie Weeks","doi":"10.3233/PPR-200408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVES: Shoulder pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder, which carries a high cost to healthcare systems. Exercise is a common conservative management strategy for a range of shoulder conditions and can reduce shoulder pain and improve function. Exercise classes that integrate education and self-management strategies have been shown to be cost-effective, offer psycho-social benefits and promote self-efficacy. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of an 8-week educational and exercise-based shoulder rehabilitation programme following the introduction of evidence-based modifications. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of a shoulder rehabilitation programme at X Trust was conducted, comparing existing anonymised Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) scores from two cohorts of class participants from 2017-18 and 2018-19 that were previously collected by the physiotherapy team. Data from the two cohorts were analysed separately, and in comparison, to assess class efficacy. Descriptive data were also analysed from a patient satisfaction survey from the 2018-19 cohort. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients completed the 8-week shoulder rehabilitation programme during the period of data collection (2018-2019). The 2018-19 cohort showed significant improvements in SPADI (p 0.001) and PSFS scores (p 0.001). No significant difference was found between the improvements seen in the 2017-18 cohort and the 2018-19 cohort. 96% of the 31 respondents who completed the patient satisfaction survey felt the class helped to achieve their goals. CONCLUSION: A group-based shoulder rehabilitation class, which included loaded exercises and patient education, led to improvements in pain, disability and function for patients with rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP) in this outpatient setting, but anticipated additional benefits based on evidence were not observed.","PeriodicalId":38170,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","volume":"42 1","pages":"13-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/PPR-200408","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/PPR-200408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Shoulder pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder, which carries a high cost to healthcare systems. Exercise is a common conservative management strategy for a range of shoulder conditions and can reduce shoulder pain and improve function. Exercise classes that integrate education and self-management strategies have been shown to be cost-effective, offer psycho-social benefits and promote self-efficacy. This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of an 8-week educational and exercise-based shoulder rehabilitation programme following the introduction of evidence-based modifications. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of a shoulder rehabilitation programme at X Trust was conducted, comparing existing anonymised Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) and Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS) scores from two cohorts of class participants from 2017-18 and 2018-19 that were previously collected by the physiotherapy team. Data from the two cohorts were analysed separately, and in comparison, to assess class efficacy. Descriptive data were also analysed from a patient satisfaction survey from the 2018-19 cohort. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients completed the 8-week shoulder rehabilitation programme during the period of data collection (2018-2019). The 2018-19 cohort showed significant improvements in SPADI (p 0.001) and PSFS scores (p 0.001). No significant difference was found between the improvements seen in the 2017-18 cohort and the 2018-19 cohort. 96% of the 31 respondents who completed the patient satisfaction survey felt the class helped to achieve their goals. CONCLUSION: A group-based shoulder rehabilitation class, which included loaded exercises and patient education, led to improvements in pain, disability and function for patients with rotator cuff related shoulder pain (RCRSP) in this outpatient setting, but anticipated additional benefits based on evidence were not observed.
英国一家医院基于证据修改后的肩部康复课程评估
目的:肩痛是一种常见的肌肉骨骼疾病,它给医疗保健系统带来了高昂的成本。锻炼是一种常见的肩部保守管理策略,可以减轻肩部疼痛并改善功能。结合教育和自我管理策略的锻炼课程已被证明具有成本效益,提供心理和社会效益,并提高自我效能。本研究旨在检验在引入循证改良方法后,为期8周的以教育和运动为基础的肩部康复方案的有效性。方法:对X Trust的肩部康复计划进行回顾性评估,比较2017-18年和2018-19年物理治疗团队收集的两组班级参与者的现有匿名肩部疼痛和残疾指数(SPADI)和患者特异性功能量表(PSFS)评分。分别分析两个队列的数据,并进行比较,以评估班级疗效。描述性数据还分析了2018-19年队列患者满意度调查。结果:在数据收集期间(2018-2019),共有47名患者完成了为期8周的肩部康复计划。2018-19年队列显示SPADI (p 0.001)和PSFS评分显著改善(p 0.001)。2017-18年队列和2018-19年队列的改善没有显著差异。在完成患者满意度调查的31名受访者中,96%的人认为该课程有助于实现他们的目标。结论:基于小组的肩部康复课程,包括负重锻炼和患者教育,在门诊环境中改善了肩袖相关肩痛(RCRSP)患者的疼痛、残疾和功能,但没有观察到基于证据的预期额外益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiotherapy Practice and Research
Physiotherapy Practice and Research Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信