Control of marriage and (im)mobility in Venice (16th-­17th centuries) in dialogue with Cultures of Vigilance

Teresa Bernardi
{"title":"Control of marriage and (im)mobility in Venice (16th-­17th centuries) in dialogue with Cultures of Vigilance","authors":"Teresa Bernardi","doi":"10.3280/ss2022-177006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyses the interactions between the control of marriage and human mobility in early modern Venice. It examines the role that ordinary people and local communities played in controlling migrants' mobility and marital unions. In particular, it shows the ways in which the religious authorities attempted to collect information about mobile actors in order to prevent the crime of bigamy. The research focuses particularly on the intermediaries and the networks through which oral testimonies and certificates were conveyed, both locally and trans-locally. To do so, the author uses a specific archival source, the so-called processetti matrimoniali: namely, pre-matrimonial enquiries aimed at attesting the marital status of foreigners, widows and widowers, and other mobile actors (i.e., merchants, sailors, and pilgrims) who wanted to get married in Venice. It is in this regard that the Venetian urban context will be analysed as a case study for discussing the historical perspectives of two recent books: The History and Cultures of Vigilance. Historicizing the Role of Private Attention in Society, edited by A. Brendecke and P. Molino; and Riferire all'autorità. Denuncia e delazione tra Medioevo ed Età moderna, edited by M.G. Muzzarelli. Using the perspective of the \"cultures of vigilance\", instead of the surveillance approach, will help to counter the idea that the control of marriage was simply a top-down process, or a centralized disciplinary action. It will reveal that local and trans-local communities were important means of control, able to influence the effectiveness of administrative and government practices.","PeriodicalId":39512,"journal":{"name":"Societa e storia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societa e storia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/ss2022-177006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper analyses the interactions between the control of marriage and human mobility in early modern Venice. It examines the role that ordinary people and local communities played in controlling migrants' mobility and marital unions. In particular, it shows the ways in which the religious authorities attempted to collect information about mobile actors in order to prevent the crime of bigamy. The research focuses particularly on the intermediaries and the networks through which oral testimonies and certificates were conveyed, both locally and trans-locally. To do so, the author uses a specific archival source, the so-called processetti matrimoniali: namely, pre-matrimonial enquiries aimed at attesting the marital status of foreigners, widows and widowers, and other mobile actors (i.e., merchants, sailors, and pilgrims) who wanted to get married in Venice. It is in this regard that the Venetian urban context will be analysed as a case study for discussing the historical perspectives of two recent books: The History and Cultures of Vigilance. Historicizing the Role of Private Attention in Society, edited by A. Brendecke and P. Molino; and Riferire all'autorità. Denuncia e delazione tra Medioevo ed Età moderna, edited by M.G. Muzzarelli. Using the perspective of the "cultures of vigilance", instead of the surveillance approach, will help to counter the idea that the control of marriage was simply a top-down process, or a centralized disciplinary action. It will reveal that local and trans-local communities were important means of control, able to influence the effectiveness of administrative and government practices.
威尼斯(16 - 17世纪)的婚姻控制和(im)流动性与警惕文化的对话
本文分析了近代早期威尼斯对婚姻的控制与人口流动之间的相互作用。它考察了普通人和当地社区在控制移民流动和婚姻结合方面所起的作用。特别是,它显示了宗教当局试图收集有关流动行动者的资料以防止重婚罪的方式。研究特别侧重于在地方和跨地方传递口头证词和证书的中介机构和网络。为此,发件人使用了一种特定的档案来源,即所谓的processetti matrimonali:即婚前调查,目的是证明想在威尼斯结婚的外国人、寡妇和鳏夫以及其他流动行为者(即商人、水手和朝圣者)的婚姻状况。正是在这方面,威尼斯的城市背景将被分析为一个案例研究,以讨论最近两本书的历史观点:警惕的历史和文化。《将私人注意力在社会中的作用历史化》,A. Brendecke和P. Molino主编;和riverire都是“权威的”。M.G. Muzzarelli编辑的《中世纪和现代经济宣言》。使用“警惕文化”的观点,而不是监视方法,将有助于反驳这样一种观点,即对婚姻的控制只是一个自上而下的过程,或者是一个集中的纪律行动。它将揭示地方和跨地方社区是重要的控制手段,能够影响行政和政府做法的效力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Societa e storia
Societa e storia Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信