Study of the biodynamic response of the foot to vibration exposure

K. Goggins, A. Godwin, C. Larivière, T. Eger
{"title":"Study of the biodynamic response of the foot to vibration exposure","authors":"K. Goggins, A. Godwin, C. Larivière, T. Eger","doi":"10.3233/OER-160236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Exposure to foot-transmitted vibration (FTV) has been linked to injury; however, the biodynamic response of the foot to FTV has not been quantified. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to measure vibration transmissibility from the floor-to-ankle, and the floor-to-metatarsal, during exposure to FTV while standing, and to determine if FTV exposure frequency, or participant mass or arch index (AI) influence the transmission of FTV through the foot. METHODS: Participants’ AI was measured. Four ADXL326, tri-axial accelerometers were utilized to measure vibration on the platform medial to distal head of first metatarsal, on the distal head of first metatarsal, on the platform paralleling the medial malleolus, and on the lateral malleolus. Participants were randomly exposed to FTV at 25 Hz, 30 Hz, 35 Hz, 40 Hz, 45 Hz, and 50 Hz for 45 seconds. RESULTS: Neither the three-way interaction of location*frequency*AI [λ = 0.816, F(5,24) = 1.080, p = 0.396] or location*frequency*mass [λ = 0.959, F(5,24) = 0.203, p = 0.958] were significant ( p< 0.05). The location*frequency interaction was significant [λ = 0.246, F(5,25) = 15.365, p = 0.0001]. Differences in mean transmissibility between the ankle and metatarsal were significant at 40 Hz, 45 Hz, and 50 Hz ( p< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The greatest transmissibility magnitude measured at the metatarsal and ankle occurred at 50 Hz and 25– 30 Hz respectively, suggesting the formation of a local resonance at each location.","PeriodicalId":91780,"journal":{"name":"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety","volume":"13 1","pages":"53-66"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/OER-160236","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/OER-160236","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exposure to foot-transmitted vibration (FTV) has been linked to injury; however, the biodynamic response of the foot to FTV has not been quantified. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to measure vibration transmissibility from the floor-to-ankle, and the floor-to-metatarsal, during exposure to FTV while standing, and to determine if FTV exposure frequency, or participant mass or arch index (AI) influence the transmission of FTV through the foot. METHODS: Participants’ AI was measured. Four ADXL326, tri-axial accelerometers were utilized to measure vibration on the platform medial to distal head of first metatarsal, on the distal head of first metatarsal, on the platform paralleling the medial malleolus, and on the lateral malleolus. Participants were randomly exposed to FTV at 25 Hz, 30 Hz, 35 Hz, 40 Hz, 45 Hz, and 50 Hz for 45 seconds. RESULTS: Neither the three-way interaction of location*frequency*AI [λ = 0.816, F(5,24) = 1.080, p = 0.396] or location*frequency*mass [λ = 0.959, F(5,24) = 0.203, p = 0.958] were significant ( p< 0.05). The location*frequency interaction was significant [λ = 0.246, F(5,25) = 15.365, p = 0.0001]. Differences in mean transmissibility between the ankle and metatarsal were significant at 40 Hz, 45 Hz, and 50 Hz ( p< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The greatest transmissibility magnitude measured at the metatarsal and ankle occurred at 50 Hz and 25– 30 Hz respectively, suggesting the formation of a local resonance at each location.
足部对振动暴露的生物动力学反应研究
背景:暴露于足部传播振动(FTV)与损伤有关;然而,足部对FTV的生物动力学反应尚未被量化。目的:目的是测量站立时暴露于FTV时从地板到脚踝和地板到跖骨的振动传递性,并确定FTV暴露频率、参与者质量或足弓指数(AI)是否影响FTV通过足部的传播。方法:测量参与者的AI。采用4个ADXL326三轴加速度计测量第一跖骨内侧至远端平台、第一跖骨远端平台、平行内踝平台和外踝平台上的振动。参与者被随机暴露在25赫兹,30赫兹,35赫兹,40赫兹,45赫兹和50赫兹的FTV中45秒。结果:位置*频率*AI [λ = 0.816, F(5,24) = 1.080, p = 0.396]和位置*频率*质量[λ = 0.959, F(5,24) = 0.203, p = 0.958]的三者交互作用均不显著(p< 0.05)。位置与频率的交互作用显著[λ = 0.246, F(5,25) = 15.365, p = 0.0001]。在40 Hz、45 Hz和50 Hz时,踝关节和跖骨之间的平均传播率差异显著(p< 0.001)。结论:在跖骨和踝关节测量到的最大传递率分别发生在50 Hz和25 - 30 Hz,表明在每个位置形成局部共振。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信