Risk factors associated with live fire training: Buildup of heat stress and fatigue, recovery and role of micro-breaks

Ashutosh Mani, Kristin M Musolin, K. James, Georganne Kincer, B. Alexander, P. Succop, W. Lovett, William A. Jetter, A. Bhattacharya
{"title":"Risk factors associated with live fire training: Buildup of heat stress and fatigue, recovery and role of micro-breaks","authors":"Ashutosh Mani, Kristin M Musolin, K. James, Georganne Kincer, B. Alexander, P. Succop, W. Lovett, William A. Jetter, A. Bhattacharya","doi":"10.3233/OER-130212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Forty five percent of on-duty firefighter deaths every year are cardiovascular (CV) related. Heat stress and fatigue buildup are two common occupational risk factors for firefighters. These risk factors may increase the firefighters’ chances of having cardiac events or even death. OBJECTIVE: Buildup of heat stress and fatigue in firefighters and their recovery from these stresses during live-fire training exercises was investigated. METHODS: Twenty full time firefighters, from two different fire-stations, performed live-fire training exercise constituting three real life firefighting scenarios and rest periods incorporated in between the scenarios. Core body temperature (CBT) and heart rate (HR) were measured in real time, using an FDA approved radio pill and a polar heart rate belt. Baseline and post-scenario measurements of perceptions of physical exertion, thermal stress and respiratory distress were also collected. RESULTS: Heart rate and CBT increased significantly with the progression of the training. The HR and CBT levels at the end of each rest period were significantly higher than the baseline values. The actual rest periods provided after each scenario were shorter than the time needed for adequate recovery. Most of the firefighters crossed the industrial limit of hyperthermia and maximum recommended level of HR elevation from baseline. Firefighters from one of the stations took micro-breaks during scenarios and were found to spend less percent time over the limit of hyperthermia. These firefighters also needed less time to recover to baseline levels of HR and CBT. CONCLUSIONS: There was significant heat stress and fatigue buildup as a result of the live-fire training exercise. Longer rest periods should be provided between scenarios to ensure recovery. Also, taking micro-breaks during a live fire training scenario might help in preventing heat stress and fatigue buildup.","PeriodicalId":91780,"journal":{"name":"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety","volume":"11 1","pages":"109-121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/OER-130212","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Occupational ergonomics : the journal of the International Society for Occupational Ergonomics and Safety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/OER-130212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Forty five percent of on-duty firefighter deaths every year are cardiovascular (CV) related. Heat stress and fatigue buildup are two common occupational risk factors for firefighters. These risk factors may increase the firefighters’ chances of having cardiac events or even death. OBJECTIVE: Buildup of heat stress and fatigue in firefighters and their recovery from these stresses during live-fire training exercises was investigated. METHODS: Twenty full time firefighters, from two different fire-stations, performed live-fire training exercise constituting three real life firefighting scenarios and rest periods incorporated in between the scenarios. Core body temperature (CBT) and heart rate (HR) were measured in real time, using an FDA approved radio pill and a polar heart rate belt. Baseline and post-scenario measurements of perceptions of physical exertion, thermal stress and respiratory distress were also collected. RESULTS: Heart rate and CBT increased significantly with the progression of the training. The HR and CBT levels at the end of each rest period were significantly higher than the baseline values. The actual rest periods provided after each scenario were shorter than the time needed for adequate recovery. Most of the firefighters crossed the industrial limit of hyperthermia and maximum recommended level of HR elevation from baseline. Firefighters from one of the stations took micro-breaks during scenarios and were found to spend less percent time over the limit of hyperthermia. These firefighters also needed less time to recover to baseline levels of HR and CBT. CONCLUSIONS: There was significant heat stress and fatigue buildup as a result of the live-fire training exercise. Longer rest periods should be provided between scenarios to ensure recovery. Also, taking micro-breaks during a live fire training scenario might help in preventing heat stress and fatigue buildup.
与实弹射击训练相关的风险因素:热应激和疲劳的积累,恢复和微休息的作用
背景:每年45%的值班消防员死亡与心血管(CV)有关。热应激和疲劳积累是消防员两个常见的职业风险因素。这些危险因素可能会增加消防员患心脏病甚至死亡的几率。目的:研究消防员在实弹训练中产生的热应激和疲劳,以及他们从这些应激中恢复的情况。方法:来自两个不同消防站的20名全职消防员进行实弹射击训练,包括三个真实的消防场景,并在场景之间进行休息。实时测量核心体温(CBT)和心率(HR),使用FDA批准的无线电药丸和极心率带。还收集了体力消耗、热应激和呼吸窘迫感知的基线和场景后测量结果。结果:随着训练的进行,心率和CBT均显著升高。每个休息期结束时的HR和CBT水平均显著高于基线值。每个情景之后提供的实际休息时间比充分恢复所需的时间短。大多数消防员越过了工业热疗的极限和从基线开始的HR升高的最大推荐水平。其中一个消防站的消防队员在紧急情况下会有短暂的休息,他们发现超过高温极限的时间少于百分之百。这些消防员也需要更少的时间来恢复到HR和CBT的基线水平。结论:实弹训练演习导致了显著的热应激和疲劳积累。应该在不同场景之间提供较长的休息时间,以确保恢复。此外,在实弹训练场景中稍微休息一下可能有助于防止热应激和疲劳积累。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信