A hybrid of artificial neural network, exponential smoothing, and ARIMA models for COVID-19 time series forecasting

Q4 Mathematics
S. Safi, O. I. Sanusi
{"title":"A hybrid of artificial neural network, exponential smoothing, and ARIMA models for COVID-19 time series forecasting","authors":"S. Safi, O. I. Sanusi","doi":"10.3233/MAS-210512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model seems not to easily capture the nonlinear patterns exhibited by the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in terms of daily confirmed cases. As a result, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Error, Trend, and Seasonality (ETS) modeling have been successfully applied to resolve problems with nonlinear estimation. Our research suggests that it would be ideal to use a single model of ETS or ARIMA for COVID-19 time series forecasting rather than a complicated Hybrid model that combines several models. We compare the forecasting performance of these models using real, worldwide, daily COVID-19 data for the period between January 22, 2020 till June 19, and June 20 till January 2, 2021 which marks two stages, each stage indicating the first and the second wave respectively. We discuss various forecasting approaches and the criteria for choosing the best forecasting technique. The best forecasting model selected was compared using the forecasting assessment criterion known as Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The empirical results show that the ETS and ARIMA models outperform the ANN and Hybrid models. The main finding from the ETS and ARIMA models analysis indicate that the magnitude of the increase in total confirmed cases over time is declining and the percentage change in the death rate is also on the decline. Our results shows that the chosen forecaste models are consistent during the first and second wave of of the pandemic. These forecasts are encouraging as the world struggles to contain the spread of COVID-19. This may be the result of the social distancing measures mandated by governments worldwide.","PeriodicalId":35000,"journal":{"name":"Model Assisted Statistics and Applications","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/MAS-210512","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Model Assisted Statistics and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/MAS-210512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) model seems not to easily capture the nonlinear patterns exhibited by the 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) in terms of daily confirmed cases. As a result, Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Error, Trend, and Seasonality (ETS) modeling have been successfully applied to resolve problems with nonlinear estimation. Our research suggests that it would be ideal to use a single model of ETS or ARIMA for COVID-19 time series forecasting rather than a complicated Hybrid model that combines several models. We compare the forecasting performance of these models using real, worldwide, daily COVID-19 data for the period between January 22, 2020 till June 19, and June 20 till January 2, 2021 which marks two stages, each stage indicating the first and the second wave respectively. We discuss various forecasting approaches and the criteria for choosing the best forecasting technique. The best forecasting model selected was compared using the forecasting assessment criterion known as Mean Absolute Error (MAE). The empirical results show that the ETS and ARIMA models outperform the ANN and Hybrid models. The main finding from the ETS and ARIMA models analysis indicate that the magnitude of the increase in total confirmed cases over time is declining and the percentage change in the death rate is also on the decline. Our results shows that the chosen forecaste models are consistent during the first and second wave of of the pandemic. These forecasts are encouraging as the world struggles to contain the spread of COVID-19. This may be the result of the social distancing measures mandated by governments worldwide.
基于人工神经网络、指数平滑和ARIMA模型的COVID-19时间序列预测
自回归综合移动平均线(ARIMA)模型似乎不容易捕捉2019年新型冠状病毒(COVID-19)在每日确诊病例方面表现出的非线性模式。因此,人工神经网络(ANN)和误差、趋势和季节性(ETS)模型已经成功地应用于解决非线性估计问题。我们的研究表明,使用ETS或ARIMA的单一模型进行COVID-19时间序列预测是理想的,而不是将多个模型组合在一起的复杂混合模型。我们使用2020年1月22日至6月19日和2021年6月20日至1月2日这两个阶段的真实全球每日COVID-19数据来比较这些模型的预测效果,这两个阶段分别代表第一波和第二波。我们讨论了各种预测方法和选择最佳预测技术的标准。采用平均绝对误差(Mean Absolute Error, MAE)作为预测评价标准,对选择的最佳预测模型进行比较。实证结果表明,ETS和ARIMA模型优于ANN和Hybrid模型。ETS和ARIMA模型分析的主要发现表明,随着时间的推移,确诊病例总数的增幅正在下降,死亡率的百分比变化也在下降。我们的结果表明,所选择的预测模型在大流行的第一波和第二波期间是一致的。在全世界努力遏制COVID-19的传播之际,这些预测令人鼓舞。这可能是世界各国政府强制要求采取社会距离措施的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Model Assisted Statistics and Applications
Model Assisted Statistics and Applications Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Model Assisted Statistics and Applications is a peer reviewed international journal. Model Assisted Statistics means an improvement of inference and analysis by use of correlated information, or an underlying theoretical or design model. This might be the design, adjustment, estimation, or analytical phase of statistical project. This information may be survey generated or coming from an independent source. Original papers in the field of sampling theory, econometrics, time-series, design of experiments, and multivariate analysis will be preferred. Papers of both applied and theoretical topics are acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信