Embodied intelligence: epistemological remarks on an emerging paradigm in the artificial intelligence debate

N. Stefano, G. Ghilardi
{"title":"Embodied intelligence: epistemological remarks on an emerging paradigm in the artificial intelligence debate","authors":"N. Stefano, G. Ghilardi","doi":"10.3280/EPIS2013-001007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A new paradigm about machine-design in robotics, currently defined as ‘Embodied Intelligence’, has recently been developed. Here we consider the debate on the relationship between the hand and the intellect, from the perspective of the history of philosophy, aiming at providing a more suitable understanding of this paradigm. The new bottom-up approach to design is deeply rooted in a new kind of empiricism, which tries to overcome issues connected with the previous approach strongly committed with the Artificial Intelligence (AI) debate and its origin. Since Turing’s time, the AI debate showed a rationalistic bias which remained undisputed until now. The paradigm shift we are witnessing nowadays is a reply to that bias in order to achieve not only a better way to design robots, but also to understand some underlying epistemological remarks. In robotica si e recentemente sviluppato un nuovo paradigma relativo alla progettazione e sviluppo dei robot, definito ‘embodied intelligence’. Muovendo dal dibattito sulla relazione tra mano e intelletto, per come emerge dalla storia della filosofia, miriamo a guadagnare una miglior comprensione del nuovo paradigma. L’approccio progettuale bottom-up si qualifica come una risposta di conio empirico che tenta di risolvere alcuni nodi problematici connessi al dibattito sull’Intelligenza Artificiale sin dalle sue origini. Dai tempi di Turing, tale dibattito ha infatti presentato un profilo e una tendenza razionalistici finora non adeguatamente problematizzati. Il mutamento di paradigma a cui si sta assistendo puo essere considerato una replica a questa tendenza sia per migliorare la progettazione dei robot sia per comprendere alcuni problemi epistemologici soggiacenti.","PeriodicalId":50506,"journal":{"name":"Epistemologia","volume":"36 1","pages":"100-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epistemologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/EPIS2013-001007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A new paradigm about machine-design in robotics, currently defined as ‘Embodied Intelligence’, has recently been developed. Here we consider the debate on the relationship between the hand and the intellect, from the perspective of the history of philosophy, aiming at providing a more suitable understanding of this paradigm. The new bottom-up approach to design is deeply rooted in a new kind of empiricism, which tries to overcome issues connected with the previous approach strongly committed with the Artificial Intelligence (AI) debate and its origin. Since Turing’s time, the AI debate showed a rationalistic bias which remained undisputed until now. The paradigm shift we are witnessing nowadays is a reply to that bias in order to achieve not only a better way to design robots, but also to understand some underlying epistemological remarks. In robotica si e recentemente sviluppato un nuovo paradigma relativo alla progettazione e sviluppo dei robot, definito ‘embodied intelligence’. Muovendo dal dibattito sulla relazione tra mano e intelletto, per come emerge dalla storia della filosofia, miriamo a guadagnare una miglior comprensione del nuovo paradigma. L’approccio progettuale bottom-up si qualifica come una risposta di conio empirico che tenta di risolvere alcuni nodi problematici connessi al dibattito sull’Intelligenza Artificiale sin dalle sue origini. Dai tempi di Turing, tale dibattito ha infatti presentato un profilo e una tendenza razionalistici finora non adeguatamente problematizzati. Il mutamento di paradigma a cui si sta assistendo puo essere considerato una replica a questa tendenza sia per migliorare la progettazione dei robot sia per comprendere alcuni problemi epistemologici soggiacenti.
具身智能:关于人工智能辩论中一个新兴范式的认识论评论
最近出现了一种机器设计的新范式,目前被定义为“具身智能”。在这里,我们从哲学史的角度来考虑关于手和智力之间关系的争论,旨在为这一范式提供更合适的理解。新的自下而上的设计方法深深植根于一种新的经验主义,它试图克服与先前的方法相关的问题,这些方法与人工智能(AI)辩论及其起源有关。从图灵的时代开始,关于人工智能的争论就显示出一种理性主义的偏见,这种偏见直到现在都是无可争议的。我们现在目睹的范式转变是对这种偏见的回应,不仅是为了更好地设计机器人,也是为了理解一些潜在的认识论观点。在机器人学中,最近出现了一种新的思维模式,即相对于机器人编程的思维模式,即机器人的思维模式,定义为“具身智能”。我们的智慧,我们的智慧,我们的故事,我们的智慧,我们的智慧,我们的智慧,我们的智慧,我们的智慧,我们的智慧,我们的智慧。“自下而上的方法”是一种“自下而上的方法”,是一种“经验的方法”,是一种“经验的方法”,是一种“解决问题的方法”,是一种“有问题的方法”,是一种“人工智能的方法”。在图灵的时代,他提出了一种观点,认为这种观点是一种民族主义的倾向,一种不适当的问题。“范式的突变”是一种基于数学模型的数学模型,是一种基于数学模型的数学模型,是一种基于数学模型的数学模型,是一种基于认知的数学模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epistemologia
Epistemologia 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信