A Threat for Physicalism: a new Gedankenexperiment

Claudio Calosi, V. Fano
{"title":"A Threat for Physicalism: a new Gedankenexperiment","authors":"Claudio Calosi, V. Fano","doi":"10.3280/EPIS2012-001010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a new thought experiment that raises a threat for Minimal Physicalism, i.e. the thesis according to which mental properties supervene on physical properties. Our proposal is an example of the so called hard problems in philosophy of mind, in particular the problem of maximal consciousness. We do not however presuppose anything about its very nature apart from the minimal, weak assumption that it is determined by first order mental properties. We argue that (i) either Minimal Physicalism is unable to give an adequate account of the new thought experiment we present or (ii) has to explain the fact that two numerically distinct but physically indistinguishable individuals have different maximal consciousness due to their spatial location. We contend that this last conclusion is strongly at variance with our contemporary scientific image of the world. Presentiamo qui un nuovo esperimento mentale, che costituisce un problema per il fisicalismo, inteso come la tesi secondo cui le proprieta mentali sopravvengono su quelle fisiche. Mostriamo che se il fisicalismo fosse vero, dovremmo spiegare il fatto che due individui numericamente distinti ma fisicamente indistinguibili hanno coscienza diversa a causa della loro differente collocazione spaziale. Questa conclusione e fortemente in contrasto con la nostra attuale immagine scientifica del mondo.","PeriodicalId":50506,"journal":{"name":"Epistemologia","volume":"1 1","pages":"130-140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epistemologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/EPIS2012-001010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

We present a new thought experiment that raises a threat for Minimal Physicalism, i.e. the thesis according to which mental properties supervene on physical properties. Our proposal is an example of the so called hard problems in philosophy of mind, in particular the problem of maximal consciousness. We do not however presuppose anything about its very nature apart from the minimal, weak assumption that it is determined by first order mental properties. We argue that (i) either Minimal Physicalism is unable to give an adequate account of the new thought experiment we present or (ii) has to explain the fact that two numerically distinct but physically indistinguishable individuals have different maximal consciousness due to their spatial location. We contend that this last conclusion is strongly at variance with our contemporary scientific image of the world. Presentiamo qui un nuovo esperimento mentale, che costituisce un problema per il fisicalismo, inteso come la tesi secondo cui le proprieta mentali sopravvengono su quelle fisiche. Mostriamo che se il fisicalismo fosse vero, dovremmo spiegare il fatto che due individui numericamente distinti ma fisicamente indistinguibili hanno coscienza diversa a causa della loro differente collocazione spaziale. Questa conclusione e fortemente in contrasto con la nostra attuale immagine scientifica del mondo.
对物理主义的威胁:一个新的格丹肯实验
我们提出了一个新的思想实验,对最小物理主义提出了威胁,即根据精神属性监督物理属性的论文。我们的建议是心灵哲学中所谓的难题的一个例子,特别是最大意识的问题。然而,我们对它的本质没有任何预设,除了一个最小的、微弱的假设,即它是由一阶精神性质决定的。我们认为(i)要么最小物理主义无法充分解释我们提出的新思想实验,要么(ii)必须解释两个数字不同但物理上不可区分的个体由于其空间位置而具有不同的最大意识这一事实。我们认为,最后这个结论与我们当代对世界的科学形象大相径庭。现在,我们要做的是一种全新的实验,一种不存在问题的财政主义,一种不存在问题的财政主义,一种不存在问题的财政主义。最重要的是,我们将会看到财政政策的不同,我们将会看到经济政策的不同,我们将会看到经济政策的不同,我们将会看到经济政策的不同,我们将会看到经济政策的不同。问题的结论是,我们在对比的基础上,对自然的想象科学del mondo。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epistemologia
Epistemologia 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信