The Process in the Acquisition of Rhetorical Concepts of Students in the Fifth Grade

intesargawad
{"title":"The Process in the Acquisition of Rhetorical Concepts of Students in the Fifth Grade","authors":"intesargawad","doi":"10.36231/coedw/vol30no4.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To investigate the research objectives, the researchers put the following hypothesis: There was no statistically significant difference at the level of (0.05) between the average score of the students of the experimental group who studied the language of rhetoric according to model of learning method, and the average score of the students of the control group who studied the same article in the traditional way acquiring rhetorical concept. The researchers relied on the experimental design with the partial setting of the post-test, which depends on the experimental group that is taught using the model of the learning method, and the control group taught using the traditional method. The research sample consists of (69) female students, (34) students in the experimental group, and (35) students in the control group, the differences between the two groups in (age, intelligence) have been considered. Then, the researchers tried to adjust a number of extraneous variables that may affect the dependent variable. The researchers studied the two research groups and included the following subjects: Courage, Genetics, Disability, and Interview. In order to conduct the research experiment, the researchers identified the rhetorical concepts in the three chapters, which reached (8) historical concepts, and formulated behavioral goals in the light of their acquisition processes (concept definition, concept differentiation, concept application) Writing instructional plans and preparing the acquisition test of rhetorical concepts. The following statistical methods: (TEST for two independent samples, the difficulty and discrimination coefficient, and the coefficient of correlation Pearson and Seberman) have been used, and the following conclusion appeared: 1. The students of the experimental group who studied according to the model of the learning process were superior to the students of the control group who studied the traditional way of acquiring rhetorical concepts In the light of the results of the research, a number of conclusions about teaching using the model of learning appeared and a set of recommendations and suggestions are given.","PeriodicalId":33508,"journal":{"name":"mjl@ kly@ ltrby@ llbnt","volume":"45 11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mjl@ kly@ ltrby@ llbnt","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36231/coedw/vol30no4.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To investigate the research objectives, the researchers put the following hypothesis: There was no statistically significant difference at the level of (0.05) between the average score of the students of the experimental group who studied the language of rhetoric according to model of learning method, and the average score of the students of the control group who studied the same article in the traditional way acquiring rhetorical concept. The researchers relied on the experimental design with the partial setting of the post-test, which depends on the experimental group that is taught using the model of the learning method, and the control group taught using the traditional method. The research sample consists of (69) female students, (34) students in the experimental group, and (35) students in the control group, the differences between the two groups in (age, intelligence) have been considered. Then, the researchers tried to adjust a number of extraneous variables that may affect the dependent variable. The researchers studied the two research groups and included the following subjects: Courage, Genetics, Disability, and Interview. In order to conduct the research experiment, the researchers identified the rhetorical concepts in the three chapters, which reached (8) historical concepts, and formulated behavioral goals in the light of their acquisition processes (concept definition, concept differentiation, concept application) Writing instructional plans and preparing the acquisition test of rhetorical concepts. The following statistical methods: (TEST for two independent samples, the difficulty and discrimination coefficient, and the coefficient of correlation Pearson and Seberman) have been used, and the following conclusion appeared: 1. The students of the experimental group who studied according to the model of the learning process were superior to the students of the control group who studied the traditional way of acquiring rhetorical concepts In the light of the results of the research, a number of conclusions about teaching using the model of learning appeared and a set of recommendations and suggestions are given.
五年级学生修辞概念习得的过程
为了探究研究目的,研究者提出如下假设:实验组采用学习方法模型学习修辞语言的学生的平均分与对照组采用传统方法学习同一篇文章修辞概念的学生的平均分在(0.05)水平上无统计学差异。研究人员采用后测部分设置的实验设计,这取决于实验组采用学习方法的模型进行教学,对照组采用传统方法进行教学。研究样本由69名女学生组成,实验组34名,对照组35名,考虑了两组(年龄、智力)的差异。然后,研究人员试图调整一些可能影响因变量的无关变量。研究人员研究了两个研究小组,包括以下主题:勇气、遗传学、残疾和面试。为了进行研究实验,研究者识别了三章中的修辞概念,达到了(8)个历史概念,并根据他们的习得过程(概念定义、概念区分、概念应用)制定了行为目标。采用了以下统计方法:(对两个独立样本采用TEST、难度和辨别系数、Pearson和Seberman相关系数),得到以下结论:按照学习过程模式学习的实验组学生优于采用传统学习方式学习修辞概念的对照组学生。根据研究结果,得出了一些关于运用学习模式进行教学的结论,并提出了一套建议和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信