Severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection among vaccinated individuals: A hospital-based study.

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Dumitha Govindapala, Priyamali Jayasekara, Rajmohan Rajramanan, Nipun de Silva
{"title":"Severity of SARS-CoV-2 infection among vaccinated individuals: A hospital-based study.","authors":"Dumitha Govindapala, Priyamali Jayasekara, Rajmohan Rajramanan, Nipun de Silva","doi":"10.4038/cmj.v67i4.9742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Post-vaccination infections impart the need for real-world data on protection conferred by the vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. We aimed to evaluate the severity of post-vaccination COVID-19 and the predictors of severe disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study analysed data from 307 patients admitted to the University Hospital KDU with confirmed COVID- 19 from March 1st to November 1st, 2021, after receiving at least a single dose of a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Vaccination status and the disease severity were classified using standard definitions. A binary logistic regression model was fitted to investigate severe/critical disease predictors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the surveyed patients, 122(39.7%) were fully vaccinated, 127(41.4%) were partially vaccinated and 58 (18.9%) had developed the disease within 14 days of the first vaccine dose. Most were Sinopharm vaccine recipients (52.4 %). Non- severe disease was observed among 249(81.1%) patients and 47(15.3%) had severe disease, while 11(3.6%) needed ICU care (critical illness). Severe/critical disease was reported among 32(25.2%) partially vaccinated and 13(22.4%) patients who developed the disease within 14 days of the first vaccine dose. Of the patients deemed to have vaccine breakthrough infections (122 fully vaccinated patients), 13(10.6%) suffered severe/critical disease. Patients with comorbidity experienced more severe/critical illness (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]= 3.684, P=0.003) than those without pre-existing medical conditions. Disease progression to severe or critical illness was significantly higher among Sinopharm recipients than Covisheild recipients (AOR:2.064, P=0.048).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Comorbidity was the most important predictor of severe COVID-19 irrespective of the vaccination status. Observed higher incidence of severe disease among Sinopharm recipients warrants more extensive population studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9777,"journal":{"name":"Ceylon Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceylon Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4038/cmj.v67i4.9742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Post-vaccination infections impart the need for real-world data on protection conferred by the vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. We aimed to evaluate the severity of post-vaccination COVID-19 and the predictors of severe disease.

Methods: This cross-sectional study analysed data from 307 patients admitted to the University Hospital KDU with confirmed COVID- 19 from March 1st to November 1st, 2021, after receiving at least a single dose of a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. Vaccination status and the disease severity were classified using standard definitions. A binary logistic regression model was fitted to investigate severe/critical disease predictors.

Results: Of the surveyed patients, 122(39.7%) were fully vaccinated, 127(41.4%) were partially vaccinated and 58 (18.9%) had developed the disease within 14 days of the first vaccine dose. Most were Sinopharm vaccine recipients (52.4 %). Non- severe disease was observed among 249(81.1%) patients and 47(15.3%) had severe disease, while 11(3.6%) needed ICU care (critical illness). Severe/critical disease was reported among 32(25.2%) partially vaccinated and 13(22.4%) patients who developed the disease within 14 days of the first vaccine dose. Of the patients deemed to have vaccine breakthrough infections (122 fully vaccinated patients), 13(10.6%) suffered severe/critical disease. Patients with comorbidity experienced more severe/critical illness (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]= 3.684, P=0.003) than those without pre-existing medical conditions. Disease progression to severe or critical illness was significantly higher among Sinopharm recipients than Covisheild recipients (AOR:2.064, P=0.048).

Conclusions: Comorbidity was the most important predictor of severe COVID-19 irrespective of the vaccination status. Observed higher incidence of severe disease among Sinopharm recipients warrants more extensive population studies.

疫苗接种者感染 SARS-CoV-2 的严重程度:一项基于医院的研究
导言:接种疫苗后的感染需要获得有关 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗所提供保护的真实数据。我们的目的是评估接种 COVID-19 疫苗后的严重程度以及预测严重疾病的因素:这项横断面研究分析了 2021 年 3 月 1 日至 11 月 1 日期间,307 名确诊为 COVID-19 的患者在接种至少一剂 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗后入住科大医院的数据。疫苗接种情况和疾病严重程度按照标准定义进行分类。结果显示,在接受调查的患者中,有 122 人(122 例)(1 例)患有严重急性呼吸系统综合症(SARS-CoV-2):在接受调查的患者中,122 人(39.7%)接种了全部疫苗,127 人(41.4%)接种了部分疫苗,58 人(18.9%)在接种第一剂疫苗后 14 天内发病。大多数人是国药疫苗接种者(52.4%)。249名患者(81.1%)病情不严重,47名患者(15.3%)病情严重,11名患者(3.6%)需要重症监护室护理(危重症)。32(25.2%)名部分接种过疫苗的患者和 13(22.4%)名在接种第一剂疫苗后 14 天内发病的患者出现了重症/危重症。在被认为出现疫苗突破性感染的患者(122 名完全接种疫苗的患者)中,有 13 人(10.6%)罹患重症/危重症。有合并症的患者比没有合并症的患者病情更严重/危重(调整后的几率比 [AOR]= 3.684,P=0.003)。国药准字受试者发展为重症或危重症的比例明显高于康维舒受试者(AOR:2.064, P=0.048):结论:无论疫苗接种情况如何,合并症是预测严重COVID-19的最重要因素。结论:无论疫苗接种情况如何,合并症是预测严重COVID-19的最重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ceylon Medical Journal
Ceylon Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Ceylon Medical Journal, is the oldest surviving medical journal in Australasia. It is the only medical journal in Sri Lanka that is listed in the Index Medicus. The CMJ started life way back in 1887 as the organ of the Ceylon Branch of the British Medical Association. Except for a brief period between 1893 and 1904 when it ceased publication, the CMJ or its forbear, the Journal of the Ceylon Branch of the British Medical Association, has been published without interruption up to now. The journal"s name changed to the CMJ in 1954.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信