Assessing the True Cost of Strategic-Beta ETFs

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Ben Johnson, Hortense Bioy, D. Boyadzhiev
{"title":"Assessing the True Cost of Strategic-Beta ETFs","authors":"Ben Johnson, Hortense Bioy, D. Boyadzhiev","doi":"10.3905/jii.2016.7.1.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The report examines the differences in costs between strategic-beta (smart beta) exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and their more ordinary passive peers. Cost is an important consideration that isn’t always at the forefront of investors’ minds when selecting strategic-beta funds. The study assesses differences in fees, replication costs, and trading costs for a selection of European-domiciled, strategic-beta ETFs and market-cap-weighted ETFs linked to some of the most widely used broad equity benchmarks, including the S&P 500, MSCI World, and MSCI Emerging Markets indexes. The authors find a wide disparity in the fees charged by strategic-beta funds and that their total cost of ownership is, on average, significantly higher.","PeriodicalId":36431,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Index Investing","volume":"7 1","pages":"35 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3905/jii.2016.7.1.035","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Index Investing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jii.2016.7.1.035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The report examines the differences in costs between strategic-beta (smart beta) exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and their more ordinary passive peers. Cost is an important consideration that isn’t always at the forefront of investors’ minds when selecting strategic-beta funds. The study assesses differences in fees, replication costs, and trading costs for a selection of European-domiciled, strategic-beta ETFs and market-cap-weighted ETFs linked to some of the most widely used broad equity benchmarks, including the S&P 500, MSCI World, and MSCI Emerging Markets indexes. The authors find a wide disparity in the fees charged by strategic-beta funds and that their total cost of ownership is, on average, significantly higher.
评估策略贝塔etf的真实成本
该报告调查了战略贝塔(智能贝塔)交易所交易基金(etf)与更普通的被动型基金之间的成本差异。成本是一个重要的考虑因素,但在选择战略贝塔基金时,投资者并不总是首先考虑成本。该研究评估了一系列在欧洲注册的策略贝塔etf和市值加权etf在费用、复制成本和交易成本方面的差异,这些etf与一些最广泛使用的广泛股票基准挂钩,包括标准普尔500指数、摩根士丹利资本国际全球指数和摩根士丹利资本国际新兴市场指数。作者发现,战略贝塔基金收取的费用存在巨大差异,平均而言,它们的总拥有成本要高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Index Investing
Journal of Index Investing Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Finance
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信