BUNDLING COMPETITION BETWEEN MULTI-PRODUCT AND SINGLE-PRODUCT FIRMS

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
J. Gwon
{"title":"BUNDLING COMPETITION BETWEEN MULTI-PRODUCT AND SINGLE-PRODUCT FIRMS","authors":"J. Gwon","doi":"10.35866/CAUJED.2015.40.3.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes a simple model where a multi-product firm competes with single-product firms possibly with bundling strategy. Mixed bundling is theoretically known as an effective business tool even in the symmetric competition as well as for the monopoly. Contrary to the literature, this paper shows that mixed bundling is dominated by component pricing or pure bundling. The result holds regardless of the product complementarity by the multi-product firm. In addition, it is shown that linear component pricing will be utilized for low complementarity while pure bundling strategy will be chosen for high complementarity.","PeriodicalId":15602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of economic development","volume":"40 1","pages":"27-54"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of economic development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35866/CAUJED.2015.40.3.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

This paper analyzes a simple model where a multi-product firm competes with single-product firms possibly with bundling strategy. Mixed bundling is theoretically known as an effective business tool even in the symmetric competition as well as for the monopoly. Contrary to the literature, this paper shows that mixed bundling is dominated by component pricing or pure bundling. The result holds regardless of the product complementarity by the multi-product firm. In addition, it is shown that linear component pricing will be utilized for low complementarity while pure bundling strategy will be chosen for high complementarity.
多产品公司和单一产品公司之间的捆绑竞争
本文分析了一个多产品企业与单产品企业可能采用捆绑策略竞争的简单模型。混合捆绑在理论上被认为是一种有效的商业工具,即使在对称竞争中也是如此。与文献相反,本文表明混合捆绑是以组件定价或纯捆绑为主。无论多产品企业的产品互补性如何,结果都成立。在互补性较低的情况下,采用线性组件定价,而在互补性较高的情况下,采用纯捆绑策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of economic development
Journal of economic development Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Development (JED) promotes and encourages research that aim at economic development and growth by publishing papers of great scholarly merit on a wide range of topics and employing a wide range of approaches. JED welcomes both theoretical and empirical papers in the fields of economic development, economic growth, international trade and finance, labor economics, IO, social choice and political economics. JED also invites the economic analysis on the experiences of economic development in various dimensions from all the countries of the globe.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信