Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Indian Oncology Residents on Clinical Trials: An Observational Study

R. Cs, M. Ponraj, P. Jogmaya, Dhanraju Km, N. Jadav, Jagdeep Singh, S. Kayal, B. Dubashi, S. Cyriac
{"title":"Knowledge, Attitude and Practice of Indian Oncology Residents on Clinical Trials: An Observational Study","authors":"R. Cs, M. Ponraj, P. Jogmaya, Dhanraju Km, N. Jadav, Jagdeep Singh, S. Kayal, B. Dubashi, S. Cyriac","doi":"10.37421/2577-0535.2020.5.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives: A limiting factor in cancer treatment and prevention has been an inadequate accrual of patients onto clinical trials this more so in India and developing countries may be because of majority of trials will be done as dissertation of an oncology fellow. Many oncology training institutions are not having training curriculum regarding clinical trial design and basic statistical training which are barriers for accrual of patient in trials. Therefore, we aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice of oncology residents on clinical trials across the country to improve the curriculum methodology so that we can produce better data on clinical trials. Methods: A total 50 students were recruited across the country; students were interviewed either directly or through telephonic conversation. Minimum criteria to enroll in the study was to have at least 1 year of working knowledge in oncology institute (only senior residents were included).Verbal informed consent was obtained from all the study participants. Results: All residents participated in the study know that clinical research is imperative, however only 30 (60%) of them showed interest towards cancer clinical trials. Thirty (60%) of the participants depending on western data for their patient management.36 (73%) participants felt that they were not able to interpret the data given in clinical trials. Only 6 (11%) of the participants had access to all cancer related journals. Though 35 (70%) of the participants discuss published clinical trials every week, only 25 (50%) of the residents are changing their decision based on clinical trial data during their patient management. Conclusions: In our study it was found that the resident doctors felt that clinical research is imperative in delivering appropriate management in malignant diseases. However, they had displeasing knowledge on health research. They have positive attitude towards cancer research, but they are failing to implement due to lack of training curriculum.","PeriodicalId":75672,"journal":{"name":"Cancer clinical trials","volume":"5 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37421/2577-0535.2020.5.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: A limiting factor in cancer treatment and prevention has been an inadequate accrual of patients onto clinical trials this more so in India and developing countries may be because of majority of trials will be done as dissertation of an oncology fellow. Many oncology training institutions are not having training curriculum regarding clinical trial design and basic statistical training which are barriers for accrual of patient in trials. Therefore, we aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude and practice of oncology residents on clinical trials across the country to improve the curriculum methodology so that we can produce better data on clinical trials. Methods: A total 50 students were recruited across the country; students were interviewed either directly or through telephonic conversation. Minimum criteria to enroll in the study was to have at least 1 year of working knowledge in oncology institute (only senior residents were included).Verbal informed consent was obtained from all the study participants. Results: All residents participated in the study know that clinical research is imperative, however only 30 (60%) of them showed interest towards cancer clinical trials. Thirty (60%) of the participants depending on western data for their patient management.36 (73%) participants felt that they were not able to interpret the data given in clinical trials. Only 6 (11%) of the participants had access to all cancer related journals. Though 35 (70%) of the participants discuss published clinical trials every week, only 25 (50%) of the residents are changing their decision based on clinical trial data during their patient management. Conclusions: In our study it was found that the resident doctors felt that clinical research is imperative in delivering appropriate management in malignant diseases. However, they had displeasing knowledge on health research. They have positive attitude towards cancer research, but they are failing to implement due to lack of training curriculum.
印度肿瘤住院医师在临床试验中的知识、态度和实践:一项观察性研究
背景和目的:癌症治疗和预防的一个限制因素是临床试验患者的累积不足,在印度和发展中国家尤其如此,这可能是因为大多数试验将作为肿瘤学研究员的论文来完成。许多肿瘤培训机构没有开设临床试验设计和基础统计学培训课程,这是临床试验患者累积的障碍。因此,我们旨在评估全国肿瘤住院医师对临床试验的知识、态度和实践,以改进课程方法,以便我们能够产生更好的临床试验数据。方法:在全国范围内招募50名学生;对学生进行了直接或电话访谈。参加研究的最低标准是在肿瘤研究所至少有1年的工作经验(仅包括老年住院医师)。所有研究参与者都获得了口头知情同意。结果:所有参与研究的居民都知道临床研究的必要性,但只有30%(60%)的居民对癌症临床试验表现出兴趣。30(60%)的参与者依靠西方的数据来管理他们的病人(73%)参与者认为他们无法解释临床试验中给出的数据。只有6位(11%)的参与者能够接触到所有与癌症相关的期刊。虽然每周有35人(70%)讨论已发表的临床试验,但只有25人(50%)的住院医生在患者管理期间根据临床试验数据改变他们的决定。结论:在我们的研究中发现,住院医师认为临床研究是提供适当的恶性疾病管理的必要条件。然而,他们对健康研究的了解却令人不快。他们对癌症研究有积极的态度,但由于缺乏培训课程,他们未能实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信