Impacts of Extension Services and Social Capital Influenceon Conservation Agriculture Adoption and HouseholdFood Security Improvements

W. Zeweld, Assefa Hidgot, Gebrecherkos Gebregiorgis
{"title":"Impacts of Extension Services and Social Capital Influenceon Conservation Agriculture Adoption and HouseholdFood Security Improvements","authors":"W. Zeweld, Assefa Hidgot, Gebrecherkos Gebregiorgis","doi":"10.37421/2151-6219.2021.12.364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are limited empirical studies that explore how agricultural extension services and local institutions influence conservation agriculture adoption and household food security. Hence, this paper aims to investigate the potential impacts of extension services and local institutions (social capital) on conservation agriculture and food security. A cross-sectional data is collected from 350 randomly selected farmers in northern Ethiopia. The propensity matching method and endogenous switching regression are used to control for selection bias from observed and unobserved factors. Results indicate that extension services and social capital have significant and positive effects on adopting conservation agriculture and improving household food security. Farmers under the treated groups have higher per capita food consumption, per capita expenditure and food security levels than counterpart farmers. Besides, the rate of adoption of conservation agriculture for the treated farmers is relatively higher than for other farmers. This confirms that extension services, formal institutions and informal groups have motivated farmers to adopt conservation agriculture and replenish risks of food insecurity shocks. Therefore, governments, researchers, academicians, NGOs, development practitioners and others actors should exert utmost efforts and investments to empower local institutions and strength agricultural extension services, which are viable options to stimulate farmers to adopt sustainable agriculture in drought-prone areas of the country.","PeriodicalId":92484,"journal":{"name":"Business and economics journal","volume":"12 1","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business and economics journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37421/2151-6219.2021.12.364","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There are limited empirical studies that explore how agricultural extension services and local institutions influence conservation agriculture adoption and household food security. Hence, this paper aims to investigate the potential impacts of extension services and local institutions (social capital) on conservation agriculture and food security. A cross-sectional data is collected from 350 randomly selected farmers in northern Ethiopia. The propensity matching method and endogenous switching regression are used to control for selection bias from observed and unobserved factors. Results indicate that extension services and social capital have significant and positive effects on adopting conservation agriculture and improving household food security. Farmers under the treated groups have higher per capita food consumption, per capita expenditure and food security levels than counterpart farmers. Besides, the rate of adoption of conservation agriculture for the treated farmers is relatively higher than for other farmers. This confirms that extension services, formal institutions and informal groups have motivated farmers to adopt conservation agriculture and replenish risks of food insecurity shocks. Therefore, governments, researchers, academicians, NGOs, development practitioners and others actors should exert utmost efforts and investments to empower local institutions and strength agricultural extension services, which are viable options to stimulate farmers to adopt sustainable agriculture in drought-prone areas of the country.
推广服务和社会资本对保护性农业采用和家庭粮食安全改善的影响
探索农业推广服务和地方机构如何影响保护性农业采用和家庭粮食安全的实证研究有限。因此,本文旨在探讨推广服务和地方机构(社会资本)对保护性农业和粮食安全的潜在影响。从埃塞俄比亚北部随机选择的350名农民中收集了横断面数据。采用倾向匹配法和内生性转换回归控制观察因素和未观察因素的选择偏差。结果表明,推广服务和社会资本对采取保护性农业和改善家庭粮食安全具有显著的正向影响。治疗组农民的人均粮食消费、人均支出和粮食安全水平均高于对照组农民。此外,治疗后农户采用保护性农业的比例相对高于其他农户。这证实,推广服务、正式机构和非正式团体促使农民采用保护性农业,并弥补粮食不安全冲击的风险。因此,政府、研究人员、学者、非政府组织、发展实践者和其他行为者应尽最大努力和投入,赋予地方机构权力,加强农业推广服务,这是刺激该国干旱易发地区农民采用可持续农业的可行选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信