Robot assisted thoracic surgery: a review of current literature

Charles D Ghee, W. Vigneswaran
{"title":"Robot assisted thoracic surgery: a review of current literature","authors":"Charles D Ghee, W. Vigneswaran","doi":"10.35841/CARDIOVASCULAR-SURGERY.1.3.71-69","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Minimally invasive surgical approaches are generally desired and recommended for many thoracic procedures as they preserve function and allow for more rapid recovery of patients. Despite these advantages, the adaptation has been poor. The robotic approach allowing more intuitive movement, greater flexibility, and high definition 3D vision appears to encourage surgeons to adapt the technique. Methods: This review examines the recent English lit of the early surgical experience of the da Vinci robotic system in the treatment of lung cancer, esophageal resection and mediastinal pathology. Conclusion: The application of robotic technology to thoracic surgery has proven to be at least comparable to open or video assisted thoracoscopic techniques in several areas and in some, possibly superior. If the widespread application of robotic technology allows greater access to minimally invasive thoracic surgery, with equivalent or superior oncological and perioperative outcomes, then it seems logical that robotic technique will become the standard for many general thoracic surgical procedures.","PeriodicalId":79324,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular surgery (London, England)","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular surgery (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35841/CARDIOVASCULAR-SURGERY.1.3.71-69","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive surgical approaches are generally desired and recommended for many thoracic procedures as they preserve function and allow for more rapid recovery of patients. Despite these advantages, the adaptation has been poor. The robotic approach allowing more intuitive movement, greater flexibility, and high definition 3D vision appears to encourage surgeons to adapt the technique. Methods: This review examines the recent English lit of the early surgical experience of the da Vinci robotic system in the treatment of lung cancer, esophageal resection and mediastinal pathology. Conclusion: The application of robotic technology to thoracic surgery has proven to be at least comparable to open or video assisted thoracoscopic techniques in several areas and in some, possibly superior. If the widespread application of robotic technology allows greater access to minimally invasive thoracic surgery, with equivalent or superior oncological and perioperative outcomes, then it seems logical that robotic technique will become the standard for many general thoracic surgical procedures.
机器人辅助胸外科手术:当前文献综述
背景:微创手术方法通常是理想的,并且被推荐用于许多胸外科手术,因为它们可以保留功能并允许患者更快地恢复。尽管有这些优势,但适应性一直很差。机器人方法允许更直观的运动,更大的灵活性和高清晰度3D视觉,似乎鼓励外科医生适应这项技术。方法:本文回顾了近年来达芬奇机器人系统在肺癌、食管切除术和纵隔病理治疗中的早期手术经验。结论:机器人技术在胸外科手术中的应用已被证明至少在某些领域可与开放式或视频辅助胸腔镜技术相媲美,甚至在某些领域更胜一筹。如果机器人技术的广泛应用可以使微创胸外科手术获得更多的机会,并具有同等或更好的肿瘤和围手术期效果,那么机器人技术将成为许多普通胸外科手术的标准,这似乎是合乎逻辑的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信