Quality Surveillance of Anti-Tuberculosis Medicines in Tanzania, 2012-2018

K. Mwamwitwa, Betty A. Mag, Seth Kisenge, Sophia A. Mziray, H. Irunde, Yonah H. Mwalwisi, Adam Fimbo, Wilbroad Kalala, A. Mtenga, Akida Khea, Adonis Bitegeko, D. Shewiyo, E. Kaale, Bl, ina T. Mbaga
{"title":"Quality Surveillance of Anti-Tuberculosis Medicines in Tanzania, 2012-2018","authors":"K. Mwamwitwa, Betty A. Mag, Seth Kisenge, Sophia A. Mziray, H. Irunde, Yonah H. Mwalwisi, Adam Fimbo, Wilbroad Kalala, A. Mtenga, Akida Khea, Adonis Bitegeko, D. Shewiyo, E. Kaale, Bl, ina T. Mbaga","doi":"10.35248/2329-9088.21.9.232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The use of substandard and falsified (SF) anti-tuberculosis (ant-TB) medicines may lead to treatment failure and development of drug resistance. SF medicinal products are claimed to be more prevalent in developing countries with high burden of tuberculosis disease. National Regulatory Authorities therefore, should ensure that the quality of these life-saving medicines is systematically monitored. We conducted a post marketing surveillance study to determine the quality of anti-tuberculosis medicines circulating on the market in Tanzania Mainland. Methods: This was a prospective cross sectional study conducted between 2012 and 2018. Purposive sampling technique was used in collecting a total of 777 samples of anti-tuberculosis medicines. Samples were collected from ports of entry, Medical Stores Department (MSD) and healthcare facilities in 16 regions of Tanzania Mainland. All collected samples were subjected quality screening using Global Pharma Health Fund® (GPHF) Mini-Lab kits. Only samples collected from MSD and healthcare facilities were subjected to product information review. Samples collected from MSD and healthcare facilities that did not comply with GPHF protocol requirements or yielded doubtful results and ten percent (10%) of all those that complied were subjected to tier II confirmatory testing using full pharmacopoeia monographs at the Tanzania Medicines and Medical Device (TMDA) Quality Control Laboratory which is prequalified by the World Health Organization. Results: All 777 collected samples complied with the requirements of both GPHF minilab protocol and respective compendial monographs when subjected to screening and confirmatory testing, respectively. Of the samples collected from medicine distribution outlets 71.3% (176/247) samples did not comply with product information requirements as per TMDA labelling requirements and approved product information. Conclusion: These Results calls for continuously reinforcing and monitoring of Ant-TB medicines to ensure that only those of good quality and proper information are circulating on the Tanzanian mainland market.","PeriodicalId":90756,"journal":{"name":"Tropical medicine & surgery","volume":"9 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical medicine & surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2329-9088.21.9.232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The use of substandard and falsified (SF) anti-tuberculosis (ant-TB) medicines may lead to treatment failure and development of drug resistance. SF medicinal products are claimed to be more prevalent in developing countries with high burden of tuberculosis disease. National Regulatory Authorities therefore, should ensure that the quality of these life-saving medicines is systematically monitored. We conducted a post marketing surveillance study to determine the quality of anti-tuberculosis medicines circulating on the market in Tanzania Mainland. Methods: This was a prospective cross sectional study conducted between 2012 and 2018. Purposive sampling technique was used in collecting a total of 777 samples of anti-tuberculosis medicines. Samples were collected from ports of entry, Medical Stores Department (MSD) and healthcare facilities in 16 regions of Tanzania Mainland. All collected samples were subjected quality screening using Global Pharma Health Fund® (GPHF) Mini-Lab kits. Only samples collected from MSD and healthcare facilities were subjected to product information review. Samples collected from MSD and healthcare facilities that did not comply with GPHF protocol requirements or yielded doubtful results and ten percent (10%) of all those that complied were subjected to tier II confirmatory testing using full pharmacopoeia monographs at the Tanzania Medicines and Medical Device (TMDA) Quality Control Laboratory which is prequalified by the World Health Organization. Results: All 777 collected samples complied with the requirements of both GPHF minilab protocol and respective compendial monographs when subjected to screening and confirmatory testing, respectively. Of the samples collected from medicine distribution outlets 71.3% (176/247) samples did not comply with product information requirements as per TMDA labelling requirements and approved product information. Conclusion: These Results calls for continuously reinforcing and monitoring of Ant-TB medicines to ensure that only those of good quality and proper information are circulating on the Tanzanian mainland market.
2012-2018年坦桑尼亚抗结核药物质量监测
背景:使用不合格和伪造的抗结核药物可能导致治疗失败和耐药性的发展。SF医药产品据称在结核病高负担的发展中国家更为普遍。因此,国家监管机构应确保对这些救命药物的质量进行系统监测。我们进行了一项上市后监测研究,以确定在坦桑尼亚大陆市场上流通的抗结核药物的质量。方法:这是一项前瞻性横断面研究,于2012年至2018年进行。采用目的抽样方法,共采集抗结核药物样本777份。样本是从坦桑尼亚大陆16个地区的入境口岸、药品储藏部和卫生保健设施收集的。所有收集的样本均使用全球制药健康基金®(GPHF) Mini-Lab试剂盒进行质量筛选。只有从MSD和医疗机构收集的样品才接受产品信息审查。从MSD和卫生保健设施收集的不符合GPHF协议要求或产生可疑结果的样本,在所有符合要求的样本中,有10%(10%)在坦桑尼亚药品和医疗器械质量控制实验室进行了二级确认测试,使用完整的药典专论,该实验室由世界卫生组织进行资格预审。结果:所采集的777份样本在进行筛选和确认试验时均符合GPHF迷你实验室方案和各自药典专著的要求。在从药品经销网点采集的样品中,71.3%(176/247)的样品不符合TMDA标签要求和批准的产品信息要求。结论:这些结果要求不断加强和监测抗结核药物,以确保只有质量良好和信息正确的抗结核药物在坦桑尼亚大陆市场流通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信