Comparison of near horizontal heterophoria tests in free space and with phoropter

IF 0.7 4区 物理与天体物理 Q4 OPTICS
Optica Applicata Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.37190/oa210204
Katarzyna Perz-Juszczyszyn, M. Feltzke, Katarzyna Dubas, W. C. Maples, B. Kolodziejczak, H. Buczkowska
{"title":"Comparison of near horizontal heterophoria tests in free space and with phoropter","authors":"Katarzyna Perz-Juszczyszyn, M. Feltzke, Katarzyna Dubas, W. C. Maples, B. Kolodziejczak, H. Buczkowska","doi":"10.37190/oa210204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Measurements of phoria at near are important elements of the optometric assessment of binocular vision. It is important to know if different methods of measuring a phoria are interchangeable. This study was designed to compare phoria measures using in-phoropter (von Graefe) and in free space methods (Howell card). Methods: The study was conducted with 70 pre-presbyopic subjects, aged 23–35 years. Both near the von Graefe and near Howell card horizontal dissociated phorias along and with gradient +1.00 D and –1.00 D phorias were measured for each technique. Results: The mean values of the near dissociated phoria, for both test conditions (von Graefe and Howell card) showed a slight deviation in the two measures with von Graefe measures being generally more exophoric. The mean value of the phoropter phoria was 1.97 ∆ base-in and in free space, the value was 0.9 ∆ base-in. The phoropter phoria with the +1.00 D gradient was 5.24 ∆ base-in, and in free space, 2.73 ∆ base-in. Measurements of the phorometric phoria with a gradient of –1.00 D gave a mean of 0.42 ∆ base-out and 0.94 ∆ base-out in free space. The near phoria measures were significantly different for the basic near measure (p = 0.01) and for the +1.00 D gradient (p = 0.000002) but not for the –1.00 D measure (p = 0.36). Conclusion: The results of the differences in the near horizontal phoria in free space and in- phoropter were significantly different for the basic measure and for the +1.00 D gradient. The findings between the two methods of testing should therefore not be treated as equivalent or convertible. Each test method should have separate means and ranges established.","PeriodicalId":19589,"journal":{"name":"Optica Applicata","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Optica Applicata","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37190/oa210204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Measurements of phoria at near are important elements of the optometric assessment of binocular vision. It is important to know if different methods of measuring a phoria are interchangeable. This study was designed to compare phoria measures using in-phoropter (von Graefe) and in free space methods (Howell card). Methods: The study was conducted with 70 pre-presbyopic subjects, aged 23–35 years. Both near the von Graefe and near Howell card horizontal dissociated phorias along and with gradient +1.00 D and –1.00 D phorias were measured for each technique. Results: The mean values of the near dissociated phoria, for both test conditions (von Graefe and Howell card) showed a slight deviation in the two measures with von Graefe measures being generally more exophoric. The mean value of the phoropter phoria was 1.97 ∆ base-in and in free space, the value was 0.9 ∆ base-in. The phoropter phoria with the +1.00 D gradient was 5.24 ∆ base-in, and in free space, 2.73 ∆ base-in. Measurements of the phorometric phoria with a gradient of –1.00 D gave a mean of 0.42 ∆ base-out and 0.94 ∆ base-out in free space. The near phoria measures were significantly different for the basic near measure (p = 0.01) and for the +1.00 D gradient (p = 0.000002) but not for the –1.00 D measure (p = 0.36). Conclusion: The results of the differences in the near horizontal phoria in free space and in- phoropter were significantly different for the basic measure and for the +1.00 D gradient. The findings between the two methods of testing should therefore not be treated as equivalent or convertible. Each test method should have separate means and ranges established.
自由空间近水平暗差试验与有光差试验的比较
背景:近视距的测量是双眼视力验光评估的重要因素。重要的是要知道测量焦距的不同方法是否可以互换。本研究的目的是比较光镜内法(von Graefe)和自由空间法(Howell card)的焦距测量。方法:对70名年龄23 ~ 35岁的老花眼前期受试者进行研究。分别测量了von Graefe和Howell卡片附近沿+1.00 D和-1.00 D梯度水平分离的视界。结果:在两种测试条件下(von Graefe卡和Howell卡),近解离光的平均值在两种测量中显示出轻微的偏差,其中von Graefe测量通常更外显。光镜的平均值为1.97∆base-in,自由空间的平均值为0.9∆base-in。梯度为+1.00 D时,光度计的光度为5.24∆base-in,自由空间时,光度为2.73∆base-in。梯度为-1.00 D的光度测量的平均值为0.42,自由空间的平均值为0.94。基本近距离测量(p = 0.01)和+1.00 D梯度(p = 0.000002)的近距离测量差异显著,但-1.00 D测量无显著差异(p = 0.36)。结论:自由空间近水平视距与垂直视距的差异在基本测量和+1.00 D梯度下有显著性差异。因此,两种测试方法之间的结果不应被视为等同或可转换。每种测试方法都应该有单独的平均值和范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Optica Applicata
Optica Applicata 物理-光学
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Acoustooptics, atmospheric and ocean optics, atomic and molecular optics, coherence and statistical optics, biooptics, colorimetry, diffraction and gratings, ellipsometry and polarimetry, fiber optics and optical communication, Fourier optics, holography, integrated optics, lasers and their applications, light detectors, light and electron beams, light sources, liquid crystals, medical optics, metamaterials, microoptics, nonlinear optics, optical and electron microscopy, optical computing, optical design and fabrication, optical imaging, optical instrumentation, optical materials, optical measurements, optical modulation, optical properties of solids and thin films, optical sensing, optical systems and their elements, optical trapping, optometry, photoelasticity, photonic crystals, photonic crystal fibers, photonic devices, physical optics, quantum optics, slow and fast light, spectroscopy, storage and processing of optical information, ultrafast optics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信