Barriers to Health Care for Children with Orofacial Clefts: A Systematic Literature Review and Recommendations for Research Priorities

N. Nidey, George L. Wehby
{"title":"Barriers to Health Care for Children with Orofacial Clefts: A Systematic Literature Review and Recommendations for Research Priorities","authors":"N. Nidey, George L. Wehby","doi":"10.31532/oralhealthdentstud.2.1.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is a growing interest in health services research of orofacial clefts (OFC) in the United States. The objective of this study is to summarize the empirical knowledge to date about barriers to health care for children with OFC. Methods: We completed a systematic literature review to identify articles on barriers to health care for children with OFC in the United States. Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, and Medline were searched from their dates of origin through June 2018 using a combination of key terms related to access and barriers to health care. Case reports and studies of populations outside of the United States were excluded. Results: 4079 publications were identified using our search strategy. After a title and abstract review, 18 were included in our review as they met inclusion criteria. These studies examined health care costs, health insurance coverage, access to team care, geographic barriers, adequacy of training of community-based providers in providing services to children with OFC, and socioeconomic and demographic factors. The key findings indicate much higher health care costs for children with OFC than unaffected children early in childhood, racial/ethnic disparities in certain access measures, and inadequate insurance coverage, distance to teams, and inadequate training of community-based providers in OFC-specific services as potential areas of concern. Except for studies on health care costs, the evidence is largely based on relatively small and primarily descriptive studies. Conclusions: The extant literature documents high health care costs for OFC treatments and suggests inadequate insurance coverage, long distance to cleft teams, and racial/ethnic disparities as critical factors related to access. We discuss multiple future research priorities. Among these, understanding the impacts of variation between states in mandates for private insurance benefits and generosity in Medicaid coverage on access to care as well as effects of differences in provider reimbursements are particularly understudied areas that can be meaningful for policymaking aimed at improving access and health outcomes of children with OFC. Examining access throughout childhood and later in life and employing robust designs and population-representative data are also important research and methodological extensions of the current literature.","PeriodicalId":92701,"journal":{"name":"Oral health and dental studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oral health and dental studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31532/oralhealthdentstud.2.1.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Background: There is a growing interest in health services research of orofacial clefts (OFC) in the United States. The objective of this study is to summarize the empirical knowledge to date about barriers to health care for children with OFC. Methods: We completed a systematic literature review to identify articles on barriers to health care for children with OFC in the United States. Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, and Medline were searched from their dates of origin through June 2018 using a combination of key terms related to access and barriers to health care. Case reports and studies of populations outside of the United States were excluded. Results: 4079 publications were identified using our search strategy. After a title and abstract review, 18 were included in our review as they met inclusion criteria. These studies examined health care costs, health insurance coverage, access to team care, geographic barriers, adequacy of training of community-based providers in providing services to children with OFC, and socioeconomic and demographic factors. The key findings indicate much higher health care costs for children with OFC than unaffected children early in childhood, racial/ethnic disparities in certain access measures, and inadequate insurance coverage, distance to teams, and inadequate training of community-based providers in OFC-specific services as potential areas of concern. Except for studies on health care costs, the evidence is largely based on relatively small and primarily descriptive studies. Conclusions: The extant literature documents high health care costs for OFC treatments and suggests inadequate insurance coverage, long distance to cleft teams, and racial/ethnic disparities as critical factors related to access. We discuss multiple future research priorities. Among these, understanding the impacts of variation between states in mandates for private insurance benefits and generosity in Medicaid coverage on access to care as well as effects of differences in provider reimbursements are particularly understudied areas that can be meaningful for policymaking aimed at improving access and health outcomes of children with OFC. Examining access throughout childhood and later in life and employing robust designs and population-representative data are also important research and methodological extensions of the current literature.
唇腭裂儿童保健障碍:系统文献综述及优先研究建议
背景:在美国,人们对口腔面部唇裂(OFC)的卫生服务研究越来越感兴趣。本研究的目的是总结迄今为止关于OFC儿童保健障碍的经验知识。方法:我们完成了一项系统的文献综述,以确定美国OFC儿童医疗保健障碍的文章。Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL和Medline从它们的起源日期到2018年6月进行了搜索,使用了与医疗保健获取和障碍相关的关键术语组合。排除了美国以外人群的病例报告和研究。结果:使用我们的搜索策略确定了4079篇出版物。经过标题和摘要审查,18名符合纳入标准的人被纳入我们的综述。这些研究审查了医疗保健费用、医疗保险覆盖面、获得团队护理的机会、地理障碍、社区提供者在向患有OFC的儿童提供服务方面的培训是否充分,以及社会经济和人口因素。主要调查结果表明,患有OFC的儿童在儿童早期的医疗保健费用远高于未受影响的儿童,在某些获取措施方面存在种族/族裔差异,保险覆盖面不足,与团队的距离较远,社区提供者在OFC特定服务方面的培训不足,这些都是潜在的关注领域。除了关于卫生保健费用的研究外,证据主要是基于相对较小的描述性研究。结论:现有文献记录了OFC治疗的高医疗保健费用,并表明保险覆盖范围不足、距离远、种族/民族差异是与获得相关的关键因素。我们讨论了多个未来的研究重点。其中,了解各州在私人保险福利授权和医疗补助覆盖范围上的差异对获得医疗服务的影响以及提供者报销差异的影响是特别未被充分研究的领域,这对旨在改善OFC儿童的获得和健康结果的政策制定可能有意义。检查整个童年和生命后期的获取情况,采用可靠的设计和具有人口代表性的数据,也是对当前文献的重要研究和方法扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信