Influence of Online Sources and SocialNetworking Sites on Breastfeeding Rate andPractices in Jordan

E. Badran, Noor N. Aldamiri, Azhar Shamasneh, Lana M. Braik, Sabika S. Allehdan, R. Tayyem
{"title":"Influence of Online Sources and SocialNetworking Sites on Breastfeeding Rate andPractices in Jordan","authors":"E. Badran, Noor N. Aldamiri, Azhar Shamasneh, Lana M. Braik, Sabika S. Allehdan, R. Tayyem","doi":"10.35248/2161-0665.20.10.358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study asses the influence of using mobile health in supporting breastfeeding through online sources and Social Network Sites (SNS) among pregnant and lactating mothers on EBF rates and practices at one and two months postpartum. Design: A cross-sectional study with initial face-to-face interviews using structured questionnaire followed up with telephone interviews at one and two months postpartum was conducted at University Hospital over two months period. A convenient sample of 181. Jordanian women in their third trimester of pregnancy was recruited. The included data were: personal characteristics, breastfeeding intention and rate at 1 and 2 months, and questions about the use of online researching or different SNS resources, in providing necessary information for breastfeeding, along with how much the information was trusted and if it had an impact on BF practices. Breastfeeding status and use of online resources were assessed at the initial and follow-up Interviews. Results: Online sources were used by 74% of participants. They most often used Google (44%), followed by Facebook (24.6%), as significant sources of obtaining and sharing information with others for breastfeeding support. Moreover, 82.5% of those users did so before giving birth, and were overwhelmingly confident (92.5%) in the accuracy of the obtained information. Users (n=134) were significantly more likely than non-users (n=47) to indicate that online sources enhanced breastfeeding practices and influenced their decision to continue EBF. Using these sites during pregnancy was associated with a significantly higher EBF rate among users at the first month and second month postpartum respectively. Conclusion: The study demonstrated high use of online and SNS resources that enhanced BF practices and rate at one and two months of age. In areas where breastfeeding programs are lacking, there is a need to design interactive mobile health platforms to motivate women to engage in breastfeeding during pregnancy.","PeriodicalId":91373,"journal":{"name":"Pediatrics & therapeutics : current research","volume":"10 1","pages":"113-126"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatrics & therapeutics : current research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35248/2161-0665.20.10.358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study asses the influence of using mobile health in supporting breastfeeding through online sources and Social Network Sites (SNS) among pregnant and lactating mothers on EBF rates and practices at one and two months postpartum. Design: A cross-sectional study with initial face-to-face interviews using structured questionnaire followed up with telephone interviews at one and two months postpartum was conducted at University Hospital over two months period. A convenient sample of 181. Jordanian women in their third trimester of pregnancy was recruited. The included data were: personal characteristics, breastfeeding intention and rate at 1 and 2 months, and questions about the use of online researching or different SNS resources, in providing necessary information for breastfeeding, along with how much the information was trusted and if it had an impact on BF practices. Breastfeeding status and use of online resources were assessed at the initial and follow-up Interviews. Results: Online sources were used by 74% of participants. They most often used Google (44%), followed by Facebook (24.6%), as significant sources of obtaining and sharing information with others for breastfeeding support. Moreover, 82.5% of those users did so before giving birth, and were overwhelmingly confident (92.5%) in the accuracy of the obtained information. Users (n=134) were significantly more likely than non-users (n=47) to indicate that online sources enhanced breastfeeding practices and influenced their decision to continue EBF. Using these sites during pregnancy was associated with a significantly higher EBF rate among users at the first month and second month postpartum respectively. Conclusion: The study demonstrated high use of online and SNS resources that enhanced BF practices and rate at one and two months of age. In areas where breastfeeding programs are lacking, there is a need to design interactive mobile health platforms to motivate women to engage in breastfeeding during pregnancy.
在线资源和社交网站对约旦母乳喂养率和做法的影响
目的:本研究评估孕妇和哺乳期母亲通过在线资源和社交网站(SNS)使用移动医疗支持母乳喂养对产后1个月和2个月EBF率和做法的影响。设计:采用横断面研究,在产后1个月和2个月采用结构化问卷进行首次面对面访谈,随后进行电话访谈。方便的181个样本。招募了怀孕晚期的约旦妇女。纳入的数据包括:个人特征,1个月和2个月的母乳喂养意图和率,以及关于使用在线研究或不同SNS资源,提供母乳喂养必要信息的问题,以及这些信息的可信度,以及它是否对BF实践有影响。在初始和后续访谈中评估了母乳喂养状况和在线资源的使用情况。结果:74%的参与者使用了在线资源。他们最常使用bb0(44%),其次是Facebook(24.6%),作为获取和与他人分享母乳喂养支持信息的重要来源。此外,82.5%的用户在分娩前就这样做了,并且对获得的信息的准确性非常有信心(92.5%)。用户(n=134)比非用户(n=47)更有可能表明,在线资源加强了母乳喂养实践,并影响了他们继续进行EBF的决定。在怀孕期间使用这些网站分别与产后第一个月和第二个月的使用者的EBF率显着升高相关。结论:研究表明,在线和SNS资源的高使用率提高了1个月和2个月大的BF实践和比率。在缺乏母乳喂养规划的地区,有必要设计互动式移动健康平台,以激励妇女在怀孕期间进行母乳喂养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信