Efficient in vitro affinity maturation of phage antibodies using BIAcore guided selections.

R. Schier, J. Marks
{"title":"Efficient in vitro affinity maturation of phage antibodies using BIAcore guided selections.","authors":"R. Schier, J. Marks","doi":"10.3233/HAB-1996-7302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Selection of higher affinity mutant phage antibodies has proven less than straightforward due to sequence dependent differences in phage antibody expression, toxicity to Escherichia coli, and difficulty in eluting the highest affinity phage. These differences lead to selection for increased levels of expression or decreased toxicity rather than for higher affinity. In this work, we demonstrate how surface plasmon resonance as employed in the BIAcore can be used to increase the efficiency of phage antibody selections, yielding greater increments in affinity from a single library. A mutant phage antibody library was created by randomizing nine amino acids located in the V(L) CDR3 of C6.5, a human scFv which binds the tumor antigen c-erbB-2 with a Kd of 1.6 x 10-8 M. The library was subjected to five rounds of selection in solution using decreasing concentrations of biotinylated c-erbB-2. After each round of selection, polyclonal phage were prepared and the rate of binding to c-erbB-2 determined in a BIAcore under mass transport limited conditions. Determination of the rate of binding permitted calculation of the concentration, and hence percent, of binding phage present. Results were used to select the antigen concentration for the next round of selection. To determine the optimal eluent, polyclonal phage was injected in a BIAcore and eluted using one of five different solutions (10 mM HCl, 50 mM HCl, 100 mM HCl, 100 mM triethylamine, 2.6 M MgCl2). Differences were observed in eluent efficacy, which was reflected in significant differences in the affinities of phage antibodies isolated from the library after a round of selection using the different eluents. Use of the BIAcore to determine the optimal eluent and guide the antigen concentration used for selection yielded a C6.5 mutant with a 16 fold reduction in Kd (Kd = 1.0 x 10-9 M). This represents at least a twofold greater increment in affinity than previously obtained from a single library of phage antibodies which bind antigens.","PeriodicalId":77166,"journal":{"name":"Human antibodies and hybridomas","volume":"7 3 1","pages":"97-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/HAB-1996-7302","citationCount":"78","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human antibodies and hybridomas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/HAB-1996-7302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 78

Abstract

Selection of higher affinity mutant phage antibodies has proven less than straightforward due to sequence dependent differences in phage antibody expression, toxicity to Escherichia coli, and difficulty in eluting the highest affinity phage. These differences lead to selection for increased levels of expression or decreased toxicity rather than for higher affinity. In this work, we demonstrate how surface plasmon resonance as employed in the BIAcore can be used to increase the efficiency of phage antibody selections, yielding greater increments in affinity from a single library. A mutant phage antibody library was created by randomizing nine amino acids located in the V(L) CDR3 of C6.5, a human scFv which binds the tumor antigen c-erbB-2 with a Kd of 1.6 x 10-8 M. The library was subjected to five rounds of selection in solution using decreasing concentrations of biotinylated c-erbB-2. After each round of selection, polyclonal phage were prepared and the rate of binding to c-erbB-2 determined in a BIAcore under mass transport limited conditions. Determination of the rate of binding permitted calculation of the concentration, and hence percent, of binding phage present. Results were used to select the antigen concentration for the next round of selection. To determine the optimal eluent, polyclonal phage was injected in a BIAcore and eluted using one of five different solutions (10 mM HCl, 50 mM HCl, 100 mM HCl, 100 mM triethylamine, 2.6 M MgCl2). Differences were observed in eluent efficacy, which was reflected in significant differences in the affinities of phage antibodies isolated from the library after a round of selection using the different eluents. Use of the BIAcore to determine the optimal eluent and guide the antigen concentration used for selection yielded a C6.5 mutant with a 16 fold reduction in Kd (Kd = 1.0 x 10-9 M). This represents at least a twofold greater increment in affinity than previously obtained from a single library of phage antibodies which bind antigens.
利用BIAcore引导选择高效的噬菌体抗体体外亲和成熟。
由于噬菌体抗体表达的序列依赖性差异、对大肠杆菌的毒性以及洗脱最高亲和力噬菌体的困难,高亲和力突变噬菌体抗体的选择被证明不是那么简单。这些差异导致选择表达水平增加或毒性降低,而不是更高的亲和力。在这项工作中,我们展示了BIAcore中使用的表面等离子体共振如何提高噬菌体抗体选择的效率,从单个文库中获得更大的亲和力增量。通过随机选取与肿瘤抗原c-erbB-2结合Kd为1.6 x 10-8 m的人单克隆抗体C6.5的V(L) CDR3中的9个氨基酸,建立突变噬菌体抗体文库。文库在降低生物素化c-erbB-2浓度的溶液中进行5轮筛选。每轮筛选后,制备多克隆噬菌体,并在有限的质量运输条件下在BIAcore中测定与c-erbB-2的结合率。结合速率的测定允许计算存在的结合噬菌体的浓度和百分比。根据结果选择抗原浓度进行下一轮筛选。为了确定最佳洗脱液,将多克隆噬菌体注射到BIAcore中,并使用5种不同的溶液(10 mM HCl, 50 mM HCl, 100 mM HCl, 100 mM三乙胺,2.6 M MgCl2)中的一种进行洗脱。不同的洗脱液对噬菌体抗体的效果存在差异,这反映在不同的洗脱液经过一轮筛选后,从文库中分离出的噬菌体抗体的亲和力存在显著差异。使用BIAcore确定最佳洗脱液并指导用于选择的抗原浓度,产生了C6.5突变体,Kd降低了16倍(Kd = 1.0 x 10-9 M)。这表明与以前从结合抗原的单个噬菌体抗体文库中获得的亲和力至少增加了两倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信