Eesti perestroika keeled (1986–1988)

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
J. Saharov
{"title":"Eesti perestroika keeled (1986–1988)","authors":"J. Saharov","doi":"10.3176/hist.2023.1.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article argues that it is possible to create an alternative political language through expert languages in an authoritarian (or late totalitarian) regime. To confirm this thesis, the article applies Cambridge school’s theory of political thought to reconstruct three argumentative ‘languages’ that Estonian authors used to describe and reform politics during the perestroika period (1986–88): (1) decentralism, (2) system theory, and (3) innovation. The availability of these (scientific) languages made possible conceptual transfers from one disciplinary domain to another. The article highlights the role of the Estonian SSR’s scientific community in this process. This community used scientific concepts","PeriodicalId":40943,"journal":{"name":"Acta Historica Tallinnensia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Historica Tallinnensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3176/hist.2023.1.04","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article argues that it is possible to create an alternative political language through expert languages in an authoritarian (or late totalitarian) regime. To confirm this thesis, the article applies Cambridge school’s theory of political thought to reconstruct three argumentative ‘languages’ that Estonian authors used to describe and reform politics during the perestroika period (1986–88): (1) decentralism, (2) system theory, and (3) innovation. The availability of these (scientific) languages made possible conceptual transfers from one disciplinary domain to another. The article highlights the role of the Estonian SSR’s scientific community in this process. This community used scientific concepts
爱沙尼亚语(1986–1988)
文章认为,在专制(或后期极权)政权中,通过专业语言创造一种替代的政治语言是可能的。为了证实这一论点,本文运用剑桥学派的政治思想理论,重构了爱沙尼亚作家在改革时期(1986 - 1988)用来描述和改革政治的三种辩论“语言”:(1)去中心化,(2)系统理论,(3)创新。这些(科学)语言的可用性使得从一个学科领域到另一个学科领域的概念转移成为可能。这篇文章强调了爱沙尼亚苏维埃社会主义共和国科学界在这一过程中的作用。这个团体使用科学概念
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信