Development of Industry in the Estonian SSR under the Seven Year Plan (1959-1965) in the Context of the National Economic Council Reform

IF 0.2 4区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
M. Pihlamägi
{"title":"Development of Industry in the Estonian SSR under the Seven Year Plan (1959-1965) in the Context of the National Economic Council Reform","authors":"M. Pihlamägi","doi":"10.3176/HIST.2013.1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The seven year plan was formulated and implemented in the period when an industrial management reform in the USSR was underway. The reform, which became known as the National Economic Council (NEC) reform, was aimed to decentralize the management of industry, including the construction industry. This reform was driven by the need for changes in the industrial sector in order to accelerate economic growth. Nevertheless, the freedom of the new administrative body, the National Economic Council, to make its own decisions on industrial matters was limited by the centrally established rules. General industrial development trends and production volumes were prescribed by the directives from Moscow. The task of the republican NECs was to increase the managerial efficiency by quickly solving the local economic problems and taking all measures to exploit local resources for the fulfilment of the plan targets. Expectations for the seven year plan were high. The plan was expected to guide the country to greater social and economic progress. The high-spirited seven year plan was based on the desire of the political leaders to make the USSR the greatest industrial power rather than on the real economic situation and opportunities for industrial development. The industrial output of the Estonian SSR was to increase 1.8-fold on the base of productivity growth. Higher productivity was to be achieved by the implementation of new technology and techniques and rapid development of automation. The Estonian SSR like Latvia and Lithuania had also to make huge contributions to the fishing industry of the USSR, as well as to the chemical industry of the USSR, in order to eliminate the backwardness in these areas. In addition, the Estonian SSR had the task to supply electrical energy for the northwestern region of the Soviet Union. According to the seven year plan, the Estonian SSR had to focus on the development of oil shale-based power engineering, building materials, engineering, fishing and fish processing industries. During the seven year plan period the industry faced many problems inherited from the era of five year plans. The industrial and construction management reform could not resolve these problems. As the economic system remained unchanged and the new management system continued to prefer administrative methods to economic methods, all the problems inherent in a command economy persisted. One of the most important problems was related to planning. The excessively large number of plans made their coordination and management difficult, especially because the plans were frequently changed. The fact that some plan parameters were changed while other, related parameters remained unaltered caused a lot of confusion. Industrial enterprises themselves had little influence on the drafting of their development plans. The system of plan indicators was too detailed; moreover, numerous indicators were fixed by a higher authority. So the industrial enterprise was still in the role of an executor. During the seven year plan like during the previous periods the total gross output volume in monetary terms was the most important indicator of success. As some enterprises met and exceeded the plan targets while others failed to meet them, the total gross output volume was attained thanks to the surplus, which covered the lacking part. The fulfilment of the plans in roubles was possible because the rate of inflation was not taken into account. The gross output volume indicator, however, did not motivate enterprises to diversify production, because it would have prevented the fulfilment of the quantitative indicators of the whole production plan. Each year the assortment plan of products was frequently not fulfilled in the case of one or another type of products and the quality of products was poor. This caused problems in consumer goods supply. One of the most pressing problems was the supply of raw materials, industrial equipment and apparatus because the existing supplies system was not able to provide enterprises the necessary amount of raw materials, equipment and spare parts in time. Production results were also adversely affected by the fact that new production capacities were not put into operation in time and stoppages, absenteeism and high staff turnover caused big-time losses. According to official statistics, the Estonian SSR fulfilled the major industrial goals. Looking at the results of the seven year plan it must be admitted that these were impressive, despite problems. However, one has to keep in mind that statistical indicators had been exaggerated by Soviet statistics from the very beginning. Instead of the planned 1.8-fold increase the industrial production in Estonia more than doubled during the seven year plan period. With regard to the labour shortage and the need to develop and implement new technologies and techniques, great attention was paid to raising the level of education and to training professionals for industry. Heavy industries (machine-building, power engineering, building materials and chemicals) developed at a rapid pace and made the most important contribution to the fulfilment of the seven year plan. The newly established Estonian apparatus and electronics industries as well as the machine-building industry developed on the basis of innovative production and technological advances and were able to create and effectively produce knowledge-intensive products. By contrast, in the consumer goods industry the growth was slow and the output of a number of important items did not meet the plan targets, which influenced badly the life quality of people.","PeriodicalId":40943,"journal":{"name":"Acta Historica Tallinnensia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3176/HIST.2013.1.05","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Historica Tallinnensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3176/HIST.2013.1.05","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The seven year plan was formulated and implemented in the period when an industrial management reform in the USSR was underway. The reform, which became known as the National Economic Council (NEC) reform, was aimed to decentralize the management of industry, including the construction industry. This reform was driven by the need for changes in the industrial sector in order to accelerate economic growth. Nevertheless, the freedom of the new administrative body, the National Economic Council, to make its own decisions on industrial matters was limited by the centrally established rules. General industrial development trends and production volumes were prescribed by the directives from Moscow. The task of the republican NECs was to increase the managerial efficiency by quickly solving the local economic problems and taking all measures to exploit local resources for the fulfilment of the plan targets. Expectations for the seven year plan were high. The plan was expected to guide the country to greater social and economic progress. The high-spirited seven year plan was based on the desire of the political leaders to make the USSR the greatest industrial power rather than on the real economic situation and opportunities for industrial development. The industrial output of the Estonian SSR was to increase 1.8-fold on the base of productivity growth. Higher productivity was to be achieved by the implementation of new technology and techniques and rapid development of automation. The Estonian SSR like Latvia and Lithuania had also to make huge contributions to the fishing industry of the USSR, as well as to the chemical industry of the USSR, in order to eliminate the backwardness in these areas. In addition, the Estonian SSR had the task to supply electrical energy for the northwestern region of the Soviet Union. According to the seven year plan, the Estonian SSR had to focus on the development of oil shale-based power engineering, building materials, engineering, fishing and fish processing industries. During the seven year plan period the industry faced many problems inherited from the era of five year plans. The industrial and construction management reform could not resolve these problems. As the economic system remained unchanged and the new management system continued to prefer administrative methods to economic methods, all the problems inherent in a command economy persisted. One of the most important problems was related to planning. The excessively large number of plans made their coordination and management difficult, especially because the plans were frequently changed. The fact that some plan parameters were changed while other, related parameters remained unaltered caused a lot of confusion. Industrial enterprises themselves had little influence on the drafting of their development plans. The system of plan indicators was too detailed; moreover, numerous indicators were fixed by a higher authority. So the industrial enterprise was still in the role of an executor. During the seven year plan like during the previous periods the total gross output volume in monetary terms was the most important indicator of success. As some enterprises met and exceeded the plan targets while others failed to meet them, the total gross output volume was attained thanks to the surplus, which covered the lacking part. The fulfilment of the plans in roubles was possible because the rate of inflation was not taken into account. The gross output volume indicator, however, did not motivate enterprises to diversify production, because it would have prevented the fulfilment of the quantitative indicators of the whole production plan. Each year the assortment plan of products was frequently not fulfilled in the case of one or another type of products and the quality of products was poor. This caused problems in consumer goods supply. One of the most pressing problems was the supply of raw materials, industrial equipment and apparatus because the existing supplies system was not able to provide enterprises the necessary amount of raw materials, equipment and spare parts in time. Production results were also adversely affected by the fact that new production capacities were not put into operation in time and stoppages, absenteeism and high staff turnover caused big-time losses. According to official statistics, the Estonian SSR fulfilled the major industrial goals. Looking at the results of the seven year plan it must be admitted that these were impressive, despite problems. However, one has to keep in mind that statistical indicators had been exaggerated by Soviet statistics from the very beginning. Instead of the planned 1.8-fold increase the industrial production in Estonia more than doubled during the seven year plan period. With regard to the labour shortage and the need to develop and implement new technologies and techniques, great attention was paid to raising the level of education and to training professionals for industry. Heavy industries (machine-building, power engineering, building materials and chemicals) developed at a rapid pace and made the most important contribution to the fulfilment of the seven year plan. The newly established Estonian apparatus and electronics industries as well as the machine-building industry developed on the basis of innovative production and technological advances and were able to create and effectively produce knowledge-intensive products. By contrast, in the consumer goods industry the growth was slow and the output of a number of important items did not meet the plan targets, which influenced badly the life quality of people.
在国家经济委员会改革的背景下,根据七年计划(1959-1965)发展爱沙尼亚苏维埃社会主义共和国的工业
七年计划是在苏联进行工业管理改革的时期制定和实施的。这一改革被称为国民经济委员会改革,其目的是分散管理包括建设行业在内的产业。推动这一改革的原因是,为了加速经济增长,需要对工业部门进行改革。然而,新的行政机构,即国家经济委员会,在工业问题上作出自己决定的自由受到中央制定的规则的限制。一般工业发展趋势和产量由莫斯科的指令规定。共和国家经济委员会的任务是通过迅速解决地方经济问题和采取一切措施开发地方资源来提高管理效率,以实现计划目标。人们对这个七年计划的期望很高。该计划有望引导国家取得更大的社会和经济进步。这个雄心勃勃的七年计划是建立在政治领导人把苏联建成世界上最大的工业强国的愿望之上的,而不是建立在实际的经济形势和工业发展的机会之上的。爱沙尼亚苏维埃社会主义共和国的工业产出将在生产率增长的基础上增加1.8倍。更高的生产力是通过实施新技术和技术以及自动化的快速发展来实现的。爱沙尼亚苏维埃社会主义共和国同拉脱维亚和立陶宛一样,也必须对苏联的渔业以及苏联的化学工业作出巨大贡献,以便消除这些地区的落后状况。此外,爱沙尼亚苏维埃社会主义共和国的任务是为苏联西北地区提供电力。根据七年计划,爱沙尼亚苏维埃社会主义共和国必须重点发展以油页岩为基础的电力工程、建筑材料、工程、渔业和鱼类加工业。在“七年计划”期间,行业面临着许多“五年计划”时代遗留下来的问题。工业和建筑管理改革并不能解决这些问题。由于经济制度没有改变,新的管理制度继续倾向于行政方法而不是经济方法,计划经济所固有的一切问题仍然存在。最重要的问题之一与规划有关。过多的计划使它们的协调和管理变得困难,特别是因为计划经常改变。一些计划参数改变了,而其他相关参数保持不变,这一事实造成了很多混乱。工业企业本身对其发展计划的起草几乎没有影响。计划指标体系过于详细;此外,许多指标是由上级当局确定的。所以工业企业仍然扮演执行者的角色。在七年计划期间,同前几个时期一样,以货币计算的总产出总量是成功的最重要指标。有的企业达到或超过了计划指标,有的企业没有达到计划指标,通过盈余实现了总产出总量,弥补了不足的部分。由于没有考虑到通货膨胀率,所以可以用卢布来执行这些计划。然而,总产量指标并不能激励企业多样化生产,因为它会阻碍整个生产计划的数量指标的实现。每年都有一种或另一种类型的产品没有完成分类计划,产品质量很差。这造成了消费品供应的问题。其中最紧迫的问题是原材料、工业设备和仪器的供应,因为现有的供应系统无法及时为企业提供必要数量的原材料、设备和备件。由于新产能没有及时投入生产,停工、缺勤和高员工流失率造成了巨大的时间损失,生产结果也受到了不利影响。根据官方统计,爱沙尼亚苏维埃社会主义共和国实现了主要的工业目标。回顾七年计划的成果,必须承认这些成果令人印象深刻,尽管存在一些问题。然而,人们必须记住,统计指标从一开始就被苏联统计夸大了。爱沙尼亚的工业生产没有按计划增加1.8倍,而是在七年计划期间增加了一倍多。 关于劳动力短缺和发展和实施新技术和工艺的需要,高度重视提高教育水平和为工业培训专业人员。重工业(机械制造、动力工程、建材和化工)发展迅速,为完成七年计划作出了最重要的贡献。新建立的爱沙尼亚仪器和电子工业以及机器制造工业是在创新生产和技术进步的基础上发展起来的,能够创造和有效地生产知识密集型产品。相比之下,在消费品行业,增长缓慢,一些重要项目的产量没有达到计划目标,这严重影响了人们的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信