{"title":"AUGUST ANNI (STI) RAHVUSLIK-DEMOKRAATLIK KULTUURIIDEAAL EESTI VABARIIGI ALGUSAASTAIL JA VAIKIVAL AJASTUL","authors":"H. Sepp","doi":"10.3176/HIST.2008.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the national-democratic ideal of August Annist in the early years of the Republic of Estonia and in the so-called era of silence. The doctor of folklore August Annist (1899-1972) was in the 1920s and 1930s also a prolific writer on the topical issues of the Estonian national culture. His thoughts were published mainly in the periodicals of the Students' Society Veljesto (Brotherhood), the students' newsletter Uliopilasleht, the journals Eesti Kirjandus (Estonian Literature) and Akadeemia (Academy), as well as in the Finnish magazine Suomalainen Suomi. \nAnnist, who was considered the leading cultural ideologist of the students' society EUS Veljesto, tried to synthesize a new vision of culture that would meet the needs of the Republic of Estonia. He was dissatisfied both with the ”outdated nationalism” of the older generation and with dogmatic socialism. He attempted to combine creatively the best traits of nationalistic ideal and socialism by attaching importance both to the national cultural activities and the realization of social ideals. Annist viewed independence as an outward form the purpose of which was to facilitate the independent development of culture. \nAn essential component of Annist's nationalism was supporting the democratic system of government. In the era of silence he was looking forward to the restoration of democracy in Estonia and recommended orientation towards the democratic Nordic countries where, as Annist thought, Estonia belonged because of its economic and social structure as well as due to the individualistic character of her people. For national and cultural reasons he favoured close and special relations with Finland.","PeriodicalId":40943,"journal":{"name":"Acta Historica Tallinnensia","volume":"12 1","pages":"18-34"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3176/HIST.2008.1.02","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Historica Tallinnensia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3176/HIST.2008.1.02","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The article examines the national-democratic ideal of August Annist in the early years of the Republic of Estonia and in the so-called era of silence. The doctor of folklore August Annist (1899-1972) was in the 1920s and 1930s also a prolific writer on the topical issues of the Estonian national culture. His thoughts were published mainly in the periodicals of the Students' Society Veljesto (Brotherhood), the students' newsletter Uliopilasleht, the journals Eesti Kirjandus (Estonian Literature) and Akadeemia (Academy), as well as in the Finnish magazine Suomalainen Suomi.
Annist, who was considered the leading cultural ideologist of the students' society EUS Veljesto, tried to synthesize a new vision of culture that would meet the needs of the Republic of Estonia. He was dissatisfied both with the ”outdated nationalism” of the older generation and with dogmatic socialism. He attempted to combine creatively the best traits of nationalistic ideal and socialism by attaching importance both to the national cultural activities and the realization of social ideals. Annist viewed independence as an outward form the purpose of which was to facilitate the independent development of culture.
An essential component of Annist's nationalism was supporting the democratic system of government. In the era of silence he was looking forward to the restoration of democracy in Estonia and recommended orientation towards the democratic Nordic countries where, as Annist thought, Estonia belonged because of its economic and social structure as well as due to the individualistic character of her people. For national and cultural reasons he favoured close and special relations with Finland.