Heideggerjevi Črni zvezki: »samoanihilacija« filozofove dediščine?

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Matic Kocijančič
{"title":"Heideggerjevi Črni zvezki: »samoanihilacija« filozofove dediščine?","authors":"Matic Kocijančič","doi":"10.34291/edinost/77/01/kocijancic","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The Black Notebooks [Schwarze Hefte] are personal notebooks that Heidegger wrote from the beginning of the 1930s to the end of the war. The first notebook has been lost, but transcripts of the next fourteen, which originated in the decade 1931–1941, were published in 2014 in three consecutive volumes of the philosopher’s Gesamtausgabe (more recently, further notebooks up to 1970 have been published). Their publication triggered a new wave of public polemics about his Nazism and anti‑Semitism. This paper evaluates Heidegger’s multistage and multilayered relationship to Judaism and National Socialism, and the most prominent modern interpretations of that relationship, especially in light of the Black Notebooks . Among such readings, some of the most profound and lucid are those of the editor of the German edition of the Notebooks , Peter Trawny, and the Spanish philos‑ opher Jesús Adrián Escudero. Many early reactions to the first publication of the notebooks were characterized by a combative outrage that was not supported by serious study and understanding of the material in question. This paper studies the reasons why that initial, sensationalist reaction stimulated precisely the opposite effect from what might be expected: Instead of jeopardizing Heidegger’s well‑established place in the Western philosophical canon, the controversies of 2014 triggered a kind of renaissance of interest in his life and work.","PeriodicalId":36962,"journal":{"name":"Unity and Dialogue","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Unity and Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34291/edinost/77/01/kocijancic","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The Black Notebooks [Schwarze Hefte] are personal notebooks that Heidegger wrote from the beginning of the 1930s to the end of the war. The first notebook has been lost, but transcripts of the next fourteen, which originated in the decade 1931–1941, were published in 2014 in three consecutive volumes of the philosopher’s Gesamtausgabe (more recently, further notebooks up to 1970 have been published). Their publication triggered a new wave of public polemics about his Nazism and anti‑Semitism. This paper evaluates Heidegger’s multistage and multilayered relationship to Judaism and National Socialism, and the most prominent modern interpretations of that relationship, especially in light of the Black Notebooks . Among such readings, some of the most profound and lucid are those of the editor of the German edition of the Notebooks , Peter Trawny, and the Spanish philos‑ opher Jesús Adrián Escudero. Many early reactions to the first publication of the notebooks were characterized by a combative outrage that was not supported by serious study and understanding of the material in question. This paper studies the reasons why that initial, sensationalist reaction stimulated precisely the opposite effect from what might be expected: Instead of jeopardizing Heidegger’s well‑established place in the Western philosophical canon, the controversies of 2014 triggered a kind of renaissance of interest in his life and work.
海德格尔的黑色论文:哲学家遗产的“自我毁灭”?
《黑色笔记》是海德格尔从20世纪30年代初到战争结束期间所写的个人笔记。第一本笔记已经丢失,但接下来的14本笔记的抄本,始于1931年至1941年的十年,于2014年连续出版了三卷哲学家的《纪事全书》(最近,直到1970年的笔记已经出版)。他们的出版引发了关于他的纳粹主义和反犹太主义的新一波公开论战。本文评价了海德格尔与犹太教和国家社会主义的多阶段、多层次的关系,以及对这种关系最突出的现代解释,特别是在《黑色笔记本》的背景下。在这样的阅读中,一些最深刻和清晰的是德语版《笔记本》的编辑彼得·特拉维尼和西班牙哲学家奥弗Jesús Adrián埃斯库德罗的作品。对这些笔记第一次出版的许多早期反应的特点是一种好斗的愤怒,这种愤怒没有得到对相关材料的认真研究和理解的支持。本文研究了为什么最初的耸人听闻的反应恰恰激发了与预期相反的效果:2014年的争议并没有危及海德格尔在西方哲学经典中的地位,而是引发了对他的生活和工作的一种兴趣复兴。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Unity and Dialogue
Unity and Dialogue Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书