The Reception of Aristotle in Martin Luther’s Late Theological Writings

IF 0.7 0 RELIGION
K. Vodenko, Yulia N. Shushkova, N. N. Kosarenko, O. Popova, A. Skotnikov, E. R. Khairullina
{"title":"The Reception of Aristotle in Martin Luther’s Late Theological Writings","authors":"K. Vodenko, Yulia N. Shushkova, N. N. Kosarenko, O. Popova, A. Skotnikov, E. R. Khairullina","doi":"10.34291/bv2021/01/vodenko","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The ambiguous legacy of Martin Luther, the sixteenth-century German reformer, includes his expressive, intellectual reactions to Aristotle’s ideas. His vehement criticism of the ancient philosopher in some of his later writings may have eclipsed Luther’s more balanced reception of Aristotle in his early career. Furthermore, careful distinctions must be made between Luther’s views on medieval Aristotelianism vs the original ideas of Aristotle. Finally, when assessing the German reformer’s appraisal of Aristotle, it is vital to distinguish between the vertical, coram Deo , horizontal, coram hominibus , human situate-dness, and interaction dimensions. This article argues that, despite the strong rejection of Aristotle’s usefulness for theology by Luther, we can discern a limited use of Aristotelian categories by Luther when dealing with some matters of politics and ethics (the rule of law in a state and an individual’s virtues). Based on Luther’s mature writings, we will examine Luther’s notions of sin, concupiscence, justification, divine grace, and human will, as these topics resona-te in his treatment of Aristotle’s philosophical heritage.","PeriodicalId":45019,"journal":{"name":"Bogoslovni Vestnik-Theological Quarterly-Ephemerides Theologicae","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bogoslovni Vestnik-Theological Quarterly-Ephemerides Theologicae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34291/bv2021/01/vodenko","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The ambiguous legacy of Martin Luther, the sixteenth-century German reformer, includes his expressive, intellectual reactions to Aristotle’s ideas. His vehement criticism of the ancient philosopher in some of his later writings may have eclipsed Luther’s more balanced reception of Aristotle in his early career. Furthermore, careful distinctions must be made between Luther’s views on medieval Aristotelianism vs the original ideas of Aristotle. Finally, when assessing the German reformer’s appraisal of Aristotle, it is vital to distinguish between the vertical, coram Deo , horizontal, coram hominibus , human situate-dness, and interaction dimensions. This article argues that, despite the strong rejection of Aristotle’s usefulness for theology by Luther, we can discern a limited use of Aristotelian categories by Luther when dealing with some matters of politics and ethics (the rule of law in a state and an individual’s virtues). Based on Luther’s mature writings, we will examine Luther’s notions of sin, concupiscence, justification, divine grace, and human will, as these topics resona-te in his treatment of Aristotle’s philosophical heritage.
马丁·路德晚期神学著作中对亚里士多德的接受
十六世纪德国改革家马丁·路德留下的模棱两可的遗产,包括他对亚里士多德思想的富有表现力的、理智的反应。他在后来的一些著作中对这位古代哲学家的激烈批评,可能盖过了路德在早期职业生涯中对亚里士多德更为平衡的接受。此外,必须仔细区分路德对中世纪亚里士多德主义的看法与亚里士多德的原始思想。最后,在评估这位德国改革家对亚里士多德的评价时,至关重要的是要区分纵向、纵向、横向、纵向、人类情境性和互动维度。本文认为,尽管路德强烈反对亚里士多德对神学的有用性,但我们可以看出,在处理某些政治和伦理问题(国家的法治和个人的美德)时,路德有限地使用了亚里士多德的范畴。基于路德的成熟作品,我们将研究路德的罪恶、贪欲、称义、神的恩典和人类意志的概念,因为这些主题在他对亚里士多德哲学遗产的处理中产生了共鸣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信