Advancing Research on Men and Reproduction

M. Lohan
{"title":"Advancing Research on Men and Reproduction","authors":"M. Lohan","doi":"10.3149/JMH.1403.214","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While feminist scholarship has centred reproduction in women’s lives, it has inadequately explored its meanings in men’s. If we assume that reproduction happens in relationships of one kind or another between males and females, then missing men is a considerable oversight. Although there is now much research on fatherhood, merely focussing on this end-stage assumes that women take care of all of the foreplay, leaving unanswered questions in relation, inter alia, to men’s desires for parenthood, men’s involvement in planning or lack of planning to have children, the way men struggle or cope with infertility, their encounters with new reproductive technologies and surrogate mothers, their experiences of foetal screening, their involvement in abortion decision-making, and their experiences of becoming or not becoming a father. In this article I argue that men have compelling experiences throughout the reproductive trajectory deserving of more attention. I offer a profeminist theoretical composition for advancing further enquiries on men and reproduction, which begins with the feminism-informed Critical Studies of Men and Masculinities (CSM), and then weaves this together with the theories of intimate citizenship, sociology of the body, and the sociology of science and technology. I will propose how concepts from these collective theories may be useful in opening up layered questions about gender relations, intimacy, bodies, and technologies in future studies of men and reproduction.","PeriodicalId":88000,"journal":{"name":"International journal of men's health","volume":"14 1","pages":"214"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of men's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3149/JMH.1403.214","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

While feminist scholarship has centred reproduction in women’s lives, it has inadequately explored its meanings in men’s. If we assume that reproduction happens in relationships of one kind or another between males and females, then missing men is a considerable oversight. Although there is now much research on fatherhood, merely focussing on this end-stage assumes that women take care of all of the foreplay, leaving unanswered questions in relation, inter alia, to men’s desires for parenthood, men’s involvement in planning or lack of planning to have children, the way men struggle or cope with infertility, their encounters with new reproductive technologies and surrogate mothers, their experiences of foetal screening, their involvement in abortion decision-making, and their experiences of becoming or not becoming a father. In this article I argue that men have compelling experiences throughout the reproductive trajectory deserving of more attention. I offer a profeminist theoretical composition for advancing further enquiries on men and reproduction, which begins with the feminism-informed Critical Studies of Men and Masculinities (CSM), and then weaves this together with the theories of intimate citizenship, sociology of the body, and the sociology of science and technology. I will propose how concepts from these collective theories may be useful in opening up layered questions about gender relations, intimacy, bodies, and technologies in future studies of men and reproduction.
推进男性与生殖研究
虽然女权主义学者把生殖作为女性生活的中心,但对其在男性生活中的意义却没有充分的探讨。如果我们假设生殖发生在男女之间的一种或另一种关系中,那么缺少男性是一个相当大的疏忽。虽然现在有很多关于父亲的研究,但仅仅集中在这个最后阶段的假设是,妇女照顾所有的前戏,留下未解的问题,特别是与男人对为人父母的渴望,男人参与计划或不计划生育,男人如何挣扎或应付不孕症,他们与新的生殖技术和代孕母亲的接触,他们对胎儿筛查的经历,他们对堕胎决策的参与,以及他们成为或不成为父亲的经历。在这篇文章中,我认为男性在整个生殖轨迹中都有值得更多关注的引人注目的经历。我提供了一个女性主义的理论组成,以推进对男性和生殖的进一步研究,它从女性主义的男性和男性气质的批判研究(CSM)开始,然后将其与亲密公民理论、身体社会学和科学技术社会学编织在一起。我将提出这些集体理论的概念如何在未来关于男性和生殖的研究中,在打开关于性别关系、亲密关系、身体和技术的分层问题方面发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信