INVESTIGATION OF CHEMİCAL CONTENT AND ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITIES OF DIFFERENT PLANT SOURCES OF ANATOLIAN PROPOLIS SAMPLES

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
E. Sönmez
{"title":"INVESTIGATION OF CHEMİCAL CONTENT AND ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITIES OF DIFFERENT PLANT SOURCES OF ANATOLIAN PROPOLIS SAMPLES","authors":"E. Sönmez","doi":"10.31467/uluaricilik.1208667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ethnopharmacological approach combined with chemical and biological methods can be a useful model in the field of pharmacology. One of these approaches, apitherapy, is the use of bee and hive products for therapeutic purposes. Propolis is among the best known of these bee products. The chemical composition of propolis varies according to the local or endemic flora, bee species, geographical origin and season. This study is to determine the antimicrobial activity differences between chestnut and polifloral origin propolis against various pathogenic bacterial species. First of all, the Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was used for the determination of bioactive components known to be responsible for antimicrobial activity. Folin-Ciocalteu method and colorimetric aluminum chloride assay were used to determine the total phenolic (TP) and flavonoid (TF) amounts. 19 different pathogenic microorganisms were selected to test the antimicrobial activity levels of propolis samples with agar well diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) methods. TP and TF values of chestnut propolis (71.06 mg GAE/mL-11.75 mg QE/mL) were significantly higher than polifloral sample (36.84 mg GAE/mL-7.04 mg QE/mL). Chrysin, a flavone derivative, was the most abundant compound in both samples. The MIC values of chestnut propolis ranged from 19.5 to 2500 µg/mL, while the MIC value of polifloral origin propolis was between 39.06 and 5000 µg/mL. The most susceptible strain was Mycobacterium smegmatis for both samples with different concentration. Notably, it was observed that the botanical origins affect the chemical composition of propolis, and this situation can also be effect antibacterial and antifungal activity in respective propolis because of the different amount and diversity of bioactive compounds. Consequently, chestnut propolis is a promising candidate for drug discovery that can be used to treat some infectious diseases, including resistant bacteria.","PeriodicalId":52271,"journal":{"name":"Uludag Aricilik Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uludag Aricilik Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31467/uluaricilik.1208667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ethnopharmacological approach combined with chemical and biological methods can be a useful model in the field of pharmacology. One of these approaches, apitherapy, is the use of bee and hive products for therapeutic purposes. Propolis is among the best known of these bee products. The chemical composition of propolis varies according to the local or endemic flora, bee species, geographical origin and season. This study is to determine the antimicrobial activity differences between chestnut and polifloral origin propolis against various pathogenic bacterial species. First of all, the Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method was used for the determination of bioactive components known to be responsible for antimicrobial activity. Folin-Ciocalteu method and colorimetric aluminum chloride assay were used to determine the total phenolic (TP) and flavonoid (TF) amounts. 19 different pathogenic microorganisms were selected to test the antimicrobial activity levels of propolis samples with agar well diffusion and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) methods. TP and TF values of chestnut propolis (71.06 mg GAE/mL-11.75 mg QE/mL) were significantly higher than polifloral sample (36.84 mg GAE/mL-7.04 mg QE/mL). Chrysin, a flavone derivative, was the most abundant compound in both samples. The MIC values of chestnut propolis ranged from 19.5 to 2500 µg/mL, while the MIC value of polifloral origin propolis was between 39.06 and 5000 µg/mL. The most susceptible strain was Mycobacterium smegmatis for both samples with different concentration. Notably, it was observed that the botanical origins affect the chemical composition of propolis, and this situation can also be effect antibacterial and antifungal activity in respective propolis because of the different amount and diversity of bioactive compounds. Consequently, chestnut propolis is a promising candidate for drug discovery that can be used to treat some infectious diseases, including resistant bacteria.
不同植物来源的安纳托利亚蜂胶样品chemİcal含量及抗菌活性的研究
民族药理学方法与化学方法和生物学方法相结合,可以成为药理学领域的有益模式。其中一种方法,蜂疗,是使用蜜蜂和蜂箱产品的治疗目的。蜂胶是这些蜂产品中最著名的。蜂胶的化学成分因当地或特有的植物群、蜜蜂种类、地理来源和季节而异。本研究旨在测定板栗与花粉源蜂胶对不同致病菌的抑菌活性差异。首先,采用液相色谱-质谱(LC-MS/MS)法对已知的抗菌活性成分进行测定。采用Folin-Ciocalteu法和比色氯化铝法测定总酚(TP)和类黄酮(TF)的含量。选取19种不同病原微生物,采用琼脂孔扩散法和最低抑菌浓度法(MIC)测定蜂胶样品的抑菌活性。板栗蜂胶的TP和TF值(71.06 mg GAE/mL-11.75 mg QE/mL)显著高于多花样品(36.84 mg GAE/mL-7.04 mg QE/mL)。黄酮类衍生物黄菊花素在两种样品中含量最高。栗子蜂胶的MIC值为19.5 ~ 2500µg/mL,而花粉源蜂胶的MIC值为39.06 ~ 5000µg/mL。两种样品在不同浓度下均以耻垢分枝杆菌最敏感。值得注意的是,植物来源会影响蜂胶的化学成分,这种情况也会影响蜂胶的抗菌和抗真菌活性,因为蜂胶中生物活性成分的含量和多样性不同。因此,栗子蜂胶是一个有希望的候选药物发现,可用于治疗一些传染病,包括耐药细菌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Uludag Aricilik Dergisi
Uludag Aricilik Dergisi Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信