A Brazilian cost-utility analysis of trabecular micro-bypass with iStent inject® for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma

Q4 Medicine
R. A. P. Guedes, Camila Pepe Souza, L. L. Dias, L. Murta, D. Gravina, A. Chaoubah
{"title":"A Brazilian cost-utility analysis of trabecular micro-bypass with iStent inject® for the treatment of open-angle glaucoma","authors":"R. A. P. Guedes, Camila Pepe Souza, L. L. Dias, L. Murta, D. Gravina, A. Chaoubah","doi":"10.37039/1982.8551.20220049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To evaluate the cost-utility of the iStent inject ® for the treatment of mild-to-moderate open- angle glaucoma (OAG) within the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). Methods: A Markov model was developed, in which the effectiveness outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER: R$ / QALY quality-adjusted life-year). Direct medical costs were obtained from the SUS perspective. The base case comprised of a hypothetical cohort of patients with OAG using topical medication and being managed according to the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines (PCDT) and a real-world setting based on data from Datasus. The model’s robustness through sensitivity analyses was tested. Results: In the PCDT base case setting, the trabecular micro-bypass implant provided gains of 0.47 QALYs and an ICER of R$7,996.66/QALY compared to treatment with topical medication. In the real-world setting based on data from Datasus, the trabecular micro-bypass implant, provided gains of 0.47 QALYs and an ICER of R$4,485.68/QALY compared to treatment with topical medication. The results were robust to sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Incorporating iStent inject® to SUS provides an improvement in the patient’s quality of life with an additional cost that warrants the benefit provided to patients. Results may be considered cost-effective compared to topical medication.","PeriodicalId":49619,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Oftalmologia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Oftalmologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37039/1982.8551.20220049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the cost-utility of the iStent inject ® for the treatment of mild-to-moderate open- angle glaucoma (OAG) within the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). Methods: A Markov model was developed, in which the effectiveness outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER: R$ / QALY quality-adjusted life-year). Direct medical costs were obtained from the SUS perspective. The base case comprised of a hypothetical cohort of patients with OAG using topical medication and being managed according to the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines (PCDT) and a real-world setting based on data from Datasus. The model’s robustness through sensitivity analyses was tested. Results: In the PCDT base case setting, the trabecular micro-bypass implant provided gains of 0.47 QALYs and an ICER of R$7,996.66/QALY compared to treatment with topical medication. In the real-world setting based on data from Datasus, the trabecular micro-bypass implant, provided gains of 0.47 QALYs and an ICER of R$4,485.68/QALY compared to treatment with topical medication. The results were robust to sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Incorporating iStent inject® to SUS provides an improvement in the patient’s quality of life with an additional cost that warrants the benefit provided to patients. Results may be considered cost-effective compared to topical medication.
巴西小梁微搭桥治疗开角型青光眼的成本-效用分析
目的:评估iStent注射液®在巴西统一卫生系统(SUS)中治疗轻至中度开角型青光眼(OAG)的成本-效用。方法:建立马尔科夫模型,以增量成本-效果比(ICER: R$ / QALY质量调整生命年)作为有效性指标。直接医疗费用是从单一系统角度获得的。基本案例包括一个假设的OAG患者队列,使用局部药物,并根据临床方案和治疗指南(PCDT)进行管理,以及基于Datasus数据的现实环境。通过敏感性分析检验了模型的稳健性。结果:在PCDT基础病例设置中,与局部药物治疗相比,小梁微旁路植入物提供了0.47 QALY的增益和7,996.66雷亚尔/QALY的ICER。根据Datasus的数据,在现实环境中,与局部药物治疗相比,小梁微旁路植入物提供了0.47 QALY的增益和4,485.68雷亚尔/QALY的ICER。结果对敏感性分析具有稳健性。结论:将iStent®注射到SUS中可以改善患者的生活质量,但额外的成本保证了为患者提供的益处。与局部用药相比,结果可能被认为具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia (Rev Bras Oftalmol.) - ISSN 0034-7280, publicação científica da Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia, se propõe a divulgar artigos que contribuam para o aperfeiçoamento e o desenvolvimento da prática, da pesquisa e do ensino da Oftalmologia e de especialidades afins. Todos os manuscritos, após aprovação pelos Editores serão avaliados por dois ou três revisores qualificados (peer review), sendo o anonimato garantido em todo o processo de julgamento.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信