The Reception of Boethian Topics in the Early Middle Ages

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Fiorella Magnano
{"title":"The Reception of Boethian Topics in the Early Middle Ages","authors":"Fiorella Magnano","doi":"10.34096/petm.v42.n2.10035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to focus on the coexistence, during the transmission of the doctrine on the Topics in the early Middle Ages, of two different interpretations: although both emerge from two commentaries on Cicero’s Topics, however, they gave rise to two different readings: the one transmitted by Marius Victorinus (ca. 280-365 AC) who thought the topics almost exclusively in the service of Rhetoric, the other conceived by Boethius (ca. 480-524 AC) who intended to restore the centrality that the Topics had in the Aristotelian Logic, by subordinating the rethorical Topics to dialectical Topics. My conclusion is that the Early Middle Ages can be considered, from an epistemological point of view, as a long boetiana aetas. Although the corpus of Boethius’s logical writings was not yet available until the second half of the 11th century, Boethius’s methodological approach on the Topics somehow continued to support the slow but constant absorption of the topical doctrine into the new Christian sensibility.","PeriodicalId":34178,"journal":{"name":"Patristica et Mediaevalia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patristica et Mediaevalia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34096/petm.v42.n2.10035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to focus on the coexistence, during the transmission of the doctrine on the Topics in the early Middle Ages, of two different interpretations: although both emerge from two commentaries on Cicero’s Topics, however, they gave rise to two different readings: the one transmitted by Marius Victorinus (ca. 280-365 AC) who thought the topics almost exclusively in the service of Rhetoric, the other conceived by Boethius (ca. 480-524 AC) who intended to restore the centrality that the Topics had in the Aristotelian Logic, by subordinating the rethorical Topics to dialectical Topics. My conclusion is that the Early Middle Ages can be considered, from an epistemological point of view, as a long boetiana aetas. Although the corpus of Boethius’s logical writings was not yet available until the second half of the 11th century, Boethius’s methodological approach on the Topics somehow continued to support the slow but constant absorption of the topical doctrine into the new Christian sensibility.
中世纪早期波伊提亚主题的接受
本研究的目的是聚焦于共存,在中世纪早期关于主题的学说的传播过程中,两种不同的解释:尽管这两种解释都来自对西塞罗的主题的两种评论,然而,它们产生了两种不同的解读:一种是由马略·维克多里努斯(约公元前280-365年)提出的,他认为主题几乎完全是为修辞学服务的,另一种是由波伊提乌(约公元前480-524年)提出的,他打算通过将修辞主题从属于辩证主题来恢复主题在亚里士多德逻辑中的中心地位。我的结论是,从认识论的角度来看,中世纪早期可以被认为是一个漫长的世纪。尽管直到11世纪下半叶,波伊提乌的逻辑著作的语料库还没有出现,但波伊提乌关于主题的方法论方法不知怎么地继续支持着主题学说缓慢但持续地被吸收到新的基督教感性中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patristica et Mediaevalia
Patristica et Mediaevalia Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信