Applying the Lessons of South African Nuclear Disarmament to North Korea

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Liang Tuang Nah
{"title":"Applying the Lessons of South African Nuclear Disarmament to North Korea","authors":"Liang Tuang Nah","doi":"10.3172/NKR.10.2.89","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionSatellite imagery has revealed steam coming from the renovated North Korean nuclear reactor at Yongbyon,1 implying that Pyongyang has renewed efforts to accumulate plutonium, which can be processed from the reactor's waste products, in order to expand its stockpile of nuclear warheads. If this is true, it represents a fresh phase of nuclear escalation from North Korea, made all the more serious since this action nullifies previous disarmament progress made in 2008 when Pyongyang demolished a cooling tower at the Yongbyon reactor,2 partially disabling its nuclear weapons program.Worryingly, the reactor needs to run for at least a year before spent fuel rods can be removed for plutonium harvesting, and the predicted date when the DPRK can begin reaping fresh weapons grade plutonium is fast approaching. Additionally, North Korea has a uranium enrichment program, which was first detected in 2002, and could also produce uranium-based nuclear arms. Despite the lack of concrete intelligence regarding the efficacy of Pyongyang's uranium enrichment for weapons building, it would be fair to assume that if left to its own devices, the DPRK's pool of nuclear explosives is set to grow.However, Pyongyang's behavior does not preclude an improvement in disarmament prospects leading to nuclear rollback. Turning to the South African nuclear disarmament model, hope for North Korean nuclear disarmament can be salvaged by the fact that Pretoria decommissioned its entire nuclear munitions manufacturing capability along with all operational atomic bombs. Hence, if the latter can relinquish its nuclear deterrent, so can the former.Learning from South Africa's Nuclear DisarmamentRevisiting the decommissioning of the South African nuclear weapons program from 1990 to 1991,3 permits the parsing of ideas for North Korean denuclearization despite the disparate nature of both states. South Africa's status as the only country to indigenously build and dismantle its nuclear arsenal should provide pointers as to how North Korea can be encouraged to relinquish nuclear arms.Concerning factors driving President F.W. de Klerk to order the dismantlement of Pretoria's nuclear weapons program in 1989, it can be substantiated that: (1) weakening Soviet support for Angola and Mozambique lessened the security threat that these two adversarial states posed against South Africa's northern borders4; (2) years of sanctions due to the imposition of apartheid had battered the South African economy, leading to a desperate need for externally driven economic rehabilitation5 (which would be jeopardized by pariah status from nuclear arms possession) and; (3) De Klerk strongly believed in the morality of nuclear disarmament.6As such, South African nuclear disarmament was brought about by a pacification of serious national security threats, the realization that sanctions induced economic autarky was intolerable, and the positive effect of international nonproliferation norms. Correspondingly, if the North Korean security paradigm improves, benefits from economic interdependence become tangible and prestige or legitimacy from rogue status cessation can be gained, Pyongyang might agree to denuclearize.North Korean Economic, Norms-Based and National Security RealitiesNorth Korea has a moribund economy. Despite the autarky promoting state ideology of Juche, North Korea seems incapable of surviving without foreign assistance. For instance, its economy suffered a dip as soon as socialist support was withdrawn in 19917 and shrunk by almost half from 1990 to 1999.8 Additionally, the North Korean economy only grew once from 2009 to 2011 with gross domestic product only increasing by 0.8 percent in 2011.9 Moreover, the DPRK has been constantly unable to feed its population in contemporary times with crop failure in 2014 brought about by drought,10 and serious food shortages from 1995 onward due to natural disasters and economic mismanagement, thereby degrading labor productivity and societal sustainability. …","PeriodicalId":40013,"journal":{"name":"North Korean Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North Korean Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3172/NKR.10.2.89","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionSatellite imagery has revealed steam coming from the renovated North Korean nuclear reactor at Yongbyon,1 implying that Pyongyang has renewed efforts to accumulate plutonium, which can be processed from the reactor's waste products, in order to expand its stockpile of nuclear warheads. If this is true, it represents a fresh phase of nuclear escalation from North Korea, made all the more serious since this action nullifies previous disarmament progress made in 2008 when Pyongyang demolished a cooling tower at the Yongbyon reactor,2 partially disabling its nuclear weapons program.Worryingly, the reactor needs to run for at least a year before spent fuel rods can be removed for plutonium harvesting, and the predicted date when the DPRK can begin reaping fresh weapons grade plutonium is fast approaching. Additionally, North Korea has a uranium enrichment program, which was first detected in 2002, and could also produce uranium-based nuclear arms. Despite the lack of concrete intelligence regarding the efficacy of Pyongyang's uranium enrichment for weapons building, it would be fair to assume that if left to its own devices, the DPRK's pool of nuclear explosives is set to grow.However, Pyongyang's behavior does not preclude an improvement in disarmament prospects leading to nuclear rollback. Turning to the South African nuclear disarmament model, hope for North Korean nuclear disarmament can be salvaged by the fact that Pretoria decommissioned its entire nuclear munitions manufacturing capability along with all operational atomic bombs. Hence, if the latter can relinquish its nuclear deterrent, so can the former.Learning from South Africa's Nuclear DisarmamentRevisiting the decommissioning of the South African nuclear weapons program from 1990 to 1991,3 permits the parsing of ideas for North Korean denuclearization despite the disparate nature of both states. South Africa's status as the only country to indigenously build and dismantle its nuclear arsenal should provide pointers as to how North Korea can be encouraged to relinquish nuclear arms.Concerning factors driving President F.W. de Klerk to order the dismantlement of Pretoria's nuclear weapons program in 1989, it can be substantiated that: (1) weakening Soviet support for Angola and Mozambique lessened the security threat that these two adversarial states posed against South Africa's northern borders4; (2) years of sanctions due to the imposition of apartheid had battered the South African economy, leading to a desperate need for externally driven economic rehabilitation5 (which would be jeopardized by pariah status from nuclear arms possession) and; (3) De Klerk strongly believed in the morality of nuclear disarmament.6As such, South African nuclear disarmament was brought about by a pacification of serious national security threats, the realization that sanctions induced economic autarky was intolerable, and the positive effect of international nonproliferation norms. Correspondingly, if the North Korean security paradigm improves, benefits from economic interdependence become tangible and prestige or legitimacy from rogue status cessation can be gained, Pyongyang might agree to denuclearize.North Korean Economic, Norms-Based and National Security RealitiesNorth Korea has a moribund economy. Despite the autarky promoting state ideology of Juche, North Korea seems incapable of surviving without foreign assistance. For instance, its economy suffered a dip as soon as socialist support was withdrawn in 19917 and shrunk by almost half from 1990 to 1999.8 Additionally, the North Korean economy only grew once from 2009 to 2011 with gross domestic product only increasing by 0.8 percent in 2011.9 Moreover, the DPRK has been constantly unable to feed its population in contemporary times with crop failure in 2014 brought about by drought,10 and serious food shortages from 1995 onward due to natural disasters and economic mismanagement, thereby degrading labor productivity and societal sustainability. …
将南非核裁军的经验教训应用于朝鲜
卫星图像显示,朝鲜宁边翻新的核反应堆冒出蒸汽,这意味着平壤重新开始努力积累钚,以扩大其核弹头的储备。钚可以从反应堆的废料中加工出来。如果这是真的,这代表着朝鲜的核升级进入了一个新的阶段,而且由于这一行动使2008年平壤拆除宁边反应堆的冷却塔、使其核武器计划部分失效后取得的裁军进展失效,情况变得更加严重。令人担忧的是,该反应堆至少需要运行一年才能取出乏燃料棒用于收集钚,而朝鲜开始收集新的武器级钚的预计日期正在迅速临近。此外,北韩有一个铀浓缩项目,这个项目于2002年首次被发现,而且还可以生产以铀为基础的核武器。尽管缺乏关于平壤在武器制造方面的铀浓缩功效的具体情报,但可以公平地假设,如果听任其自生自弃,朝鲜的核爆炸库将会增加。然而,朝鲜的行为并不排除核裁军前景的改善导致核倒退。谈到南非的核裁军模式,比勒陀利亚放弃了其全部核武器制造能力以及所有可操作的原子弹,这一事实可以挽救朝鲜核裁军的希望。因此,如果后者能够放弃其核威慑力量,那么前者也可以。从南非的核裁军中吸取教训参观1990年至1991年南非核武器计划的退役,可以分析朝鲜无核化的想法,尽管这两个国家的性质不同。南非是唯一一个自行建造和拆除核武库的国家,这应该为如何鼓励朝鲜放弃核武器提供一些指导。关于促使德克勒克总统于1989年下令废除比勒陀利亚核武器计划的因素,可以证实:(1)苏联对安哥拉和莫桑比克的支持减弱了这两个敌对国家对南非北部边界构成的安全威胁;(2)实行种族隔离制度导致的多年制裁严重打击了南非经济,导致迫切需要外部驱动的经济复苏(这将因拥有核武器而受到贱民地位的危害);德克勒克坚信核裁军的道德性。6 .因此,南非的核裁军是由于平息了严重的国家安全威胁,认识到制裁导致的经济自给自足是不可容忍的,以及国际不扩散准则的积极作用而实现的。相应地,如果朝鲜的安全模式得到改善,经济相互依存的好处变得切实可见,并且可以获得流氓地位的声望或合法性,平壤可能会同意无核化。朝鲜经济、规范和国家安全现实朝鲜经济奄奄一息。北韩虽然提倡“主体思想”的闭关自守,但如果没有外国的援助,北韩似乎无法生存。例如,1997年社会主义支持一退出,朝鲜经济就出现了下滑,1990年至1999年几乎萎缩了一半。此外,2009年至2011年,朝鲜经济只增长了一次,2011年国内生产总值(gdp)仅增长了0.8%。朝鲜在当代一直无法养活其人口,2014年干旱导致作物歉收,1995年以来由于自然灾害和经济管理不善导致严重粮食短缺,从而降低了劳动生产率和社会可持续性。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
North Korean Review
North Korean Review Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信