Conservation agriculture practices in a peanut cropping system: Effects on pod yield and soil penetration resistance

IF 1.9 4区 农林科学 Q3 SOIL SCIENCE
Olavo Betiol, D. Bolonhezi, Élcio Ríos Perez Leal, C. E. Gruener, M. D. Michelotto, C. Furlani, Fábio Fiori Ruiz
{"title":"Conservation agriculture practices in a peanut cropping system: Effects on pod yield and soil penetration resistance","authors":"Olavo Betiol, D. Bolonhezi, Élcio Ríos Perez Leal, C. E. Gruener, M. D. Michelotto, C. Furlani, Fábio Fiori Ruiz","doi":"10.36783/18069657rbcs20230004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conservation agriculture principles applied to peanut can reduce soil erosion and production costs when cultivated in rotation with sugarcane. Still, the problem with soil compaction is the leading cause of skepticism about the efficacy of this practice. This research aimed to study the effect of three soil management strategies compared with conventional for peanut cv. IAC-OL3, cultivated in rotation with sugarcane using the MEIOSI (method of intercropping occurring simultaneously) system for agronomic practices with additional analysis on changes in soil physics properties. The trial was conducted in 2019-2020 in Planalto municipality (São Paulo, Brazil) under a green-harvested sugarcane field, using a randomized complete block experimental design. The trial consisted of four soil management treatments (conventional tillage, minimum tillage with chisel, strip-tillage, and no-tillage) with five replications. Although no differences were verified in soil bulk density and porosity among treatments, the highest values of soil penetration resistance were observed in no-tillage treatment for all evaluations (before planting, at the beginning of flowering, and before and after harvesting) in comparison with conventional tillage. The difference in soil penetration resistance among the treatments diminished from planting to the end of the cycle. Furthermore, low soil disturbance and maximum covering with straw significantly increased the available water capacity and reduced the incidence and severity of groundnut ringspot virus (GRSV) on peanut plants. Consequently, both minimum-tillage and no-tillage have increased the pod yield on average by 695 and 991 kg ha -1 more than strip-tillage and conventional tillage, respectively, without differences in terms of quality and pod losses.","PeriodicalId":21215,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36783/18069657rbcs20230004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Conservation agriculture principles applied to peanut can reduce soil erosion and production costs when cultivated in rotation with sugarcane. Still, the problem with soil compaction is the leading cause of skepticism about the efficacy of this practice. This research aimed to study the effect of three soil management strategies compared with conventional for peanut cv. IAC-OL3, cultivated in rotation with sugarcane using the MEIOSI (method of intercropping occurring simultaneously) system for agronomic practices with additional analysis on changes in soil physics properties. The trial was conducted in 2019-2020 in Planalto municipality (São Paulo, Brazil) under a green-harvested sugarcane field, using a randomized complete block experimental design. The trial consisted of four soil management treatments (conventional tillage, minimum tillage with chisel, strip-tillage, and no-tillage) with five replications. Although no differences were verified in soil bulk density and porosity among treatments, the highest values of soil penetration resistance were observed in no-tillage treatment for all evaluations (before planting, at the beginning of flowering, and before and after harvesting) in comparison with conventional tillage. The difference in soil penetration resistance among the treatments diminished from planting to the end of the cycle. Furthermore, low soil disturbance and maximum covering with straw significantly increased the available water capacity and reduced the incidence and severity of groundnut ringspot virus (GRSV) on peanut plants. Consequently, both minimum-tillage and no-tillage have increased the pod yield on average by 695 and 991 kg ha -1 more than strip-tillage and conventional tillage, respectively, without differences in terms of quality and pod losses.
花生种植制度下保护性农业措施对豆荚产量和土壤穿透性的影响
花生采用保护性农业原则,与甘蔗轮作可减少水土流失,降低生产成本。然而,土壤压实的问题是人们对这种做法的有效性持怀疑态度的主要原因。本研究旨在研究3种土壤管理策略对花生生长的影响。IAC-OL3,采用MEIOSI(同时间作法)系统与甘蔗轮作,用于农艺实践,并对土壤物理特性的变化进行附加分析。该试验于2019-2020年在Planalto市(巴西圣保罗)的一块绿色甘蔗田进行,采用随机完全块试验设计。试验包括常规耕作、凿子少耕、条带耕作和免耕4种土壤管理处理,共5个重复。虽然不同处理间土壤容重和孔隙度没有差异,但在种植前、开花初期和收获前后的所有评价中,免耕处理的土壤抗渗透能力均高于常规耕作。从播种到循环结束,各处理间土壤穿透阻力的差异逐渐减小。此外,低扰动和秸秆覆盖显著提高了有效水分容量,降低了花生环斑病毒(GRSV)在花生植株上的发病率和严重程度。因此,少耕和免耕均能使豆荚产量平均增加695公斤/公顷和991公斤/公顷,比带状耕作和常规耕作分别多,在质量和豆荚损失方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo
Revista Brasileira De Ciencia Do Solo 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
32
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo is a scientific journal published by the Brazilian Society for Soil Science (SBCS), founded in 1947, and is responsible for the propagation of original and inedited technical-scientific work of interest for Soil Science. Contributions must not have been previously published or submit to other periodicals, with the only exception of articles presented in summarized form at professional meetings. Literature reviews are accepted when solicited by the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信