Cross-Cultural Analysis of Prototypes of Courtship Processes: Turkey, the United States, Lithuania, and Spain

Q2 Social Sciences
Ines Gil Torras
{"title":"Cross-Cultural Analysis of Prototypes of Courtship Processes: Turkey, the United States, Lithuania, and Spain","authors":"Ines Gil Torras","doi":"10.30884/JOGS/2020.02.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study provides an emic, ethnographic and cross-cultural view of courtship practices in the ‘modern’ world. There are limits to our ability to generalize our conclusions to posit a global process. As such this study is suggestive of a larger movement towards new forms of courtship that favor individual autonomy, the pursuit to satisfy personal desires, even at the expense of interpersonal interests. Ilouz and Finkleman (2009) referred to this shift as a move from a ‘premodern modal configurations’ to a ‘modern modal configuration’ of love and desire. Our findings support the theoretical and interview data of the above study and work by many other researchers (e.g., Giddens 2000; Ilouz 2018, 2012; Jankowiak 2008; Munck et al. 2016; Regnerus 2017). Consequently, we have confidence that the trajectory from ‘traditional’ to ‘modern’ courtship processes is a global process. Giddens observed that sex, as a result of contra-ceptives, has become ‘fully autonomous’ and become a kind of ‘art form’ (Gid-dens, 1981: 27). Regnerus (2017) builds on Giddens' work by showing how sex, love, and marriage have separated from each other, to the extent that sex is construed as an independent feature of the individual and therefore not part of a coupled, interdependent, construct such as love or family. Sex, as Regnerus writes, has become ‘the malleable property of the individual’ (Ibid.: 7). As our study supports these positions we have confidence that our findings, if extended across more cultures would not be substantially different, only more refined.","PeriodicalId":36579,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Globalization Studies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Globalization Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30884/JOGS/2020.02.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study provides an emic, ethnographic and cross-cultural view of courtship practices in the ‘modern’ world. There are limits to our ability to generalize our conclusions to posit a global process. As such this study is suggestive of a larger movement towards new forms of courtship that favor individual autonomy, the pursuit to satisfy personal desires, even at the expense of interpersonal interests. Ilouz and Finkleman (2009) referred to this shift as a move from a ‘premodern modal configurations’ to a ‘modern modal configuration’ of love and desire. Our findings support the theoretical and interview data of the above study and work by many other researchers (e.g., Giddens 2000; Ilouz 2018, 2012; Jankowiak 2008; Munck et al. 2016; Regnerus 2017). Consequently, we have confidence that the trajectory from ‘traditional’ to ‘modern’ courtship processes is a global process. Giddens observed that sex, as a result of contra-ceptives, has become ‘fully autonomous’ and become a kind of ‘art form’ (Gid-dens, 1981: 27). Regnerus (2017) builds on Giddens' work by showing how sex, love, and marriage have separated from each other, to the extent that sex is construed as an independent feature of the individual and therefore not part of a coupled, interdependent, construct such as love or family. Sex, as Regnerus writes, has become ‘the malleable property of the individual’ (Ibid.: 7). As our study supports these positions we have confidence that our findings, if extended across more cultures would not be substantially different, only more refined.
求偶过程原型的跨文化分析:土耳其、美国、立陶宛和西班牙
这项研究为“现代”世界的求爱行为提供了一个学科、民族志和跨文化的视角。我们的能力有限,不能概括我们的结论来假设一个全球性的过程。因此,这项研究暗示了一种更大的运动,即倾向于个人自主的新形式的求爱,追求满足个人欲望,甚至以牺牲人际利益为代价。Ilouz和Finkleman(2009)将这种转变称为从爱与欲望的“前现代模式配置”到“现代模式配置”的转变。我们的研究结果支持上述研究的理论和访谈数据,以及许多其他研究人员的工作(例如,Giddens 2000;Ilouz 2018,2012;Jankowiak 2008;Munck et al. 2016;2017年Regnerus如是说)。因此,我们有信心,从“传统”到“现代”的求爱过程是一个全球性的过程。吉登斯观察到,作为避孕措施的结果,性已经变得“完全自主”,并成为一种“艺术形式”(Gid-dens, 1981: 27)。Regnerus(2017)以吉登斯的研究为基础,展示了性、爱和婚姻是如何相互分离的,在某种程度上,性被解释为个体的一个独立特征,因此不是爱情或家庭等耦合的、相互依赖的结构的一部分。正如Regnerus所写,性已经成为“个体的可塑属性”(同上:7)。由于我们的研究支持这些观点,我们有信心我们的发现,如果扩展到更多的文化中,不会有本质上的不同,只会更精细。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Globalization Studies
Journal of Globalization Studies Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信