Death in the Same Compartment as a Predictor for Injury Severity

Serio F, F. Q, Shah K, McCague A
{"title":"Death in the Same Compartment as a Predictor for Injury Severity","authors":"Serio F, F. Q, Shah K, McCague A","doi":"10.36648/2476-2105.5.1.79","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine if death in same compartment is useful as a predictor for injury severity and mortality. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted of 525 high-risk automobile accident victims. Data collected from Natividad Medical Center's trauma registry were used to analyze reports of adult patients from July 1 2014 to July 1 2017. 15 patients were victims of highrisk accidents with a death in the same compartment. These patients were compared with the other 510 patients. Results: Out of 15 patients who had death in same compartment, 2 (13%) were identified to have ISS>15 and 1 (6.7%) expired. Odds of severe injury (ISS>15) were not significantly different between groups [OR 0.73 95% CI 0.16-3.3]. Odds of death between the two groups were not significantly different [OR 2.0 95% CI 0.25-17]. Mean ISS between the two groups was not significant [9.1 ± 6.3 vs 8.3 ± 0.7 P=0.8]. Conclusion: \"Death in the same compartment\" has a similar prognostic value to other criteria outlined by the CDC.","PeriodicalId":92736,"journal":{"name":"Trauma & acute care","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma & acute care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36648/2476-2105.5.1.79","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine if death in same compartment is useful as a predictor for injury severity and mortality. Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted of 525 high-risk automobile accident victims. Data collected from Natividad Medical Center's trauma registry were used to analyze reports of adult patients from July 1 2014 to July 1 2017. 15 patients were victims of highrisk accidents with a death in the same compartment. These patients were compared with the other 510 patients. Results: Out of 15 patients who had death in same compartment, 2 (13%) were identified to have ISS>15 and 1 (6.7%) expired. Odds of severe injury (ISS>15) were not significantly different between groups [OR 0.73 95% CI 0.16-3.3]. Odds of death between the two groups were not significantly different [OR 2.0 95% CI 0.25-17]. Mean ISS between the two groups was not significant [9.1 ± 6.3 vs 8.3 ± 0.7 P=0.8]. Conclusion: "Death in the same compartment" has a similar prognostic value to other criteria outlined by the CDC.
同一隔间内死亡可作为损伤严重程度的预测因子
目的:确定同一间室的死亡是否可作为损伤严重程度和死亡率的预测因子。方法:对525例交通事故高危受害者进行回顾性横断面研究。从Natividad医疗中心的创伤登记处收集的数据用于分析2014年7月1日至2017年7月1日的成人患者报告。15名患者是同一车厢内死亡的高风险事故的受害者。这些患者与其他510例患者进行比较。结果:在同一间室死亡的15例患者中,2例(13%)被确定为ISS bbb15, 1例(6.7%)死亡。两组间严重损伤的发生率(ISS bbb15)无显著差异[OR 0.73 95% CI 0.16-3.3]。两组患者的死亡几率无显著差异[OR 2.0 95% CI 0.25-17]。两组间平均ISS差异无统计学意义[9.1±6.3 vs 8.3±0.7 P=0.8]。结论:“同一隔室死亡”与CDC概述的其他标准具有相似的预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信