Validation of the Two Minute Step Test as Predictor of Aerobic Capacity in Institutionalized Elderly for Neurological Rehabilitation

Aditi Chaturvedhi
{"title":"Validation of the Two Minute Step Test as Predictor of Aerobic Capacity in Institutionalized Elderly for Neurological Rehabilitation","authors":"Aditi Chaturvedhi","doi":"10.36648/2171-6625.21.12.385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use, statistical validity, and sensitivity, of the two minute step test as predictor of aerobic capacity in institutionalized elderly for neurological rehabilitation. Method: An observational type study of 60 subjects between the age group of 60- 94 was carried out, the data analysis was done on the basis of normative values calculated for each age group and we compared heart rate, oxygen saturation and perceived exertion obtained during performance of 2 MST with those obtained during the 6 MWT. Results: According to the age group, normal values of steps were correlated with the two- minutes step test. The more number of steps performed during the twominute step test was associated with higher values of peak oxygen consumption. Comparing 2 MST and 6 MWT in 60 subjects for validity, r=0.935 (P<0.0001). They were statistically equivalent in heart rate (97 ± 4 and 95 ± 4 bpm), oxygen saturation (97 ± 0.5 and 96 ± 0.6%), rating of perceived exertion (13.6 ± 0.4 and 12.4 ± 0.4), and blood pressure (130 ± 4/62 ± 3 and 128 ± 3/62 ± 2 mmHg), (mean ± SE, 2 MST and 6 MWT, respectively). Sensitivity of the 2 MST was high, based both on the number of steps achieved by inpatients (37 ± 13 steps, mean ± SD), and healthy subjects (54 ± 18 steps) (P<0.001), Results suggest that two minute step test has potential as one of the vital tool for aerobic and physical capacity in elderly population which in turn could be a major indicator for the neurological rehabilitation protocols. Conclusion: Although the benefits of two-minutes step test as indicator for aerobic and physical capacity in elderly looks promising, general guidelines for the clinical use of two-minutes step test and its normative values is difficult to make. Future research should explore the normative values for different populations, factors affecting the use of two-minute step test, effects of two-minute step test alone on various systems without in combination with other tests.","PeriodicalId":91329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurology and neuroscience","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurology and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36648/2171-6625.21.12.385","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use, statistical validity, and sensitivity, of the two minute step test as predictor of aerobic capacity in institutionalized elderly for neurological rehabilitation. Method: An observational type study of 60 subjects between the age group of 60- 94 was carried out, the data analysis was done on the basis of normative values calculated for each age group and we compared heart rate, oxygen saturation and perceived exertion obtained during performance of 2 MST with those obtained during the 6 MWT. Results: According to the age group, normal values of steps were correlated with the two- minutes step test. The more number of steps performed during the twominute step test was associated with higher values of peak oxygen consumption. Comparing 2 MST and 6 MWT in 60 subjects for validity, r=0.935 (P<0.0001). They were statistically equivalent in heart rate (97 ± 4 and 95 ± 4 bpm), oxygen saturation (97 ± 0.5 and 96 ± 0.6%), rating of perceived exertion (13.6 ± 0.4 and 12.4 ± 0.4), and blood pressure (130 ± 4/62 ± 3 and 128 ± 3/62 ± 2 mmHg), (mean ± SE, 2 MST and 6 MWT, respectively). Sensitivity of the 2 MST was high, based both on the number of steps achieved by inpatients (37 ± 13 steps, mean ± SD), and healthy subjects (54 ± 18 steps) (P<0.001), Results suggest that two minute step test has potential as one of the vital tool for aerobic and physical capacity in elderly population which in turn could be a major indicator for the neurological rehabilitation protocols. Conclusion: Although the benefits of two-minutes step test as indicator for aerobic and physical capacity in elderly looks promising, general guidelines for the clinical use of two-minutes step test and its normative values is difficult to make. Future research should explore the normative values for different populations, factors affecting the use of two-minute step test, effects of two-minute step test alone on various systems without in combination with other tests.
两分钟步数测试作为老年人机构神经康复有氧能力预测指标的验证
目的:本研究的目的是评估两分钟步数试验作为老年人机构神经康复有氧能力预测指标的使用、统计有效性和敏感性。方法:对60 ~ 94岁年龄组60例受试者进行观察型研究,根据各年龄组计算的正常值进行数据分析,并将2 MST和6 MWT时的心率、血氧饱和度和感觉劳累进行比较。结果:两分钟步数测试结果与正常步数呈正相关。在两分钟的步数测试中,步数越多,峰值耗氧量越高。对60名受试者进行2 MST和6 MWT的效度比较,r=0.935 (P<0.0001)。两组在心率(97±4和95±4 bpm)、血氧饱和度(97±0.5和96±0.6%)、感觉劳累程度(13.6±0.4和12.4±0.4)、血压(130±4/62±3和128±3/62±2 mmHg)、(平均±SE、2 MST和6 MWT)方面具有统计学意义上的相等。基于住院患者(37±13步,mean±SD)和健康受试者(54±18步)的步数,2 MST的灵敏度较高(P<0.001),结果表明2分钟步数试验有潜力作为老年人有氧和身体能力的重要工具之一,从而可以作为神经康复方案的主要指标。结论:虽然两分钟步步试验作为老年人有氧运动和体能指标的益处是有希望的,但两分钟步步试验临床应用的通用指南及其规范性数值难以制定。未来的研究应探讨不同人群的正常值、影响两分钟步进检验使用的因素、单独两分钟步进检验在不同系统中不与其他检验结合使用的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信