Screens Stop Here! Tax Credit Thinking and the Contemporary Meaning of "Local" Filmmaking

Pub Date : 2016-04-01 DOI:10.3138/CJFS.25.1.135
Jennifer Vanderburgh
{"title":"Screens Stop Here! Tax Credit Thinking and the Contemporary Meaning of \"Local\" Filmmaking","authors":"Jennifer Vanderburgh","doi":"10.3138/CJFS.25.1.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I live in Halifax, Nova Scotia, a place, like others, that cultural policy has built and reimagined many times over. Consider Halifax's central landmark, a harbour fortress called the Citadel. Initially conceived as an eighteenthcentury British colonial strategy to ward off French, and later American, \"intruders,\" its present day iteration is as a Canadian national historic site and tourist attraction. Now owned by Parks Canada, the site attempts to entice the same \"visitors\" that it once repelled. After paying an entrance fee, each visitor to the site receives a narrative that strategically situates colonial militarism in the nations historic past, and that can be delivered in one of Canada's two official languages. Conceptualized as a living artefact of policy, the Citadel is not simply a historic site. Arguably, it remains an active fortress that strategically defends the nation-state's quasi-official discourse about Canada's prehistory. Each day, the explosive sound of the Citadel's noon gun resonates throughout the city and the surrounding municipality. In doing so, the site's policy reverberations continue to assert themselves, literally and figuratively marking the present time in place.1Often, however, policy reverberations produce inadvertent effects. In what follows, I explore the idea that provincial tax credit policies, which have incentivized the development of regional film industries, have also altered the landscape and discourse of regional filmmaking to such an extent that these policies are becoming difficult to defend. I offer this theory as a way of interpreting last year's abrupt and emotionally charged changes to Nova Scotia's film incentive programme as well as the dominant rhetorical position that industry advocates used to protest the changes. Both sides of the debate have employed a discourse to defend their positions that I am calling \"tax credit thinking.\" This is to say that both sides have overwhelmingly aligned the purpose of regional filmmaking with industrial-economic over culturalartistic goals. With mounting reports from across North America arguing that provincial, state and municipal tax credit programmes do not recuperate their investments, that they create volatile industries and tenuous employment conditions dependent on the continuation and competitiveness of their subsidies, \"tax credit thinking\" is becoming an increasingly risky line of defense for industry advocates and film workers. It might be the case, in fact, that this line of defense is putting regional film industries in jeopardy. Ironically, one of the most significant effects of regional film incentive policies might turn out to be that they have created the very conditions, discourses and measures of success that are beginning to dismantle them.NOVA SCOTIA, FOR EXAMPLE2015 may well be remembered as the year that the screen industries went dormant in Nova Scotia. While some policy decisions have gradual effects, the provincial Liberal government s 9 April announcement that it would be eliminating the Nova Scotia Film Tax Credit (NS FTC) on 1 July had immediate and seismic effects. Right away, the loss of the 20 year-old incentive programme that, at its height, subsidized up to 65% of a film's qualifying labour costs through a refundable tax credit, was held responsible for film projects pulling out of the province.2 In August, citing a \"sharp decline\" in production, two of the three major equipment providers announced that they would be closing their Nova Scotia offices. John DeBoer, COO of SIM Group, justified the decision to Playback saying, \"[tjhere hasn't been a slowdown of work... there is absolutely no work in the film industry... and we see very little coming down the pipeline.\"3 In September, a Halifax editorial coinciding with the 40th Atlantic Film Festival argued that the impact of the cancelled programme fundamentally \"disrupted a production ecosystem that evolved over decades,\" a delicate and interrelated tripartite of production incentives, infrastructure, and skilled workers. …","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/CJFS.25.1.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I live in Halifax, Nova Scotia, a place, like others, that cultural policy has built and reimagined many times over. Consider Halifax's central landmark, a harbour fortress called the Citadel. Initially conceived as an eighteenthcentury British colonial strategy to ward off French, and later American, "intruders," its present day iteration is as a Canadian national historic site and tourist attraction. Now owned by Parks Canada, the site attempts to entice the same "visitors" that it once repelled. After paying an entrance fee, each visitor to the site receives a narrative that strategically situates colonial militarism in the nations historic past, and that can be delivered in one of Canada's two official languages. Conceptualized as a living artefact of policy, the Citadel is not simply a historic site. Arguably, it remains an active fortress that strategically defends the nation-state's quasi-official discourse about Canada's prehistory. Each day, the explosive sound of the Citadel's noon gun resonates throughout the city and the surrounding municipality. In doing so, the site's policy reverberations continue to assert themselves, literally and figuratively marking the present time in place.1Often, however, policy reverberations produce inadvertent effects. In what follows, I explore the idea that provincial tax credit policies, which have incentivized the development of regional film industries, have also altered the landscape and discourse of regional filmmaking to such an extent that these policies are becoming difficult to defend. I offer this theory as a way of interpreting last year's abrupt and emotionally charged changes to Nova Scotia's film incentive programme as well as the dominant rhetorical position that industry advocates used to protest the changes. Both sides of the debate have employed a discourse to defend their positions that I am calling "tax credit thinking." This is to say that both sides have overwhelmingly aligned the purpose of regional filmmaking with industrial-economic over culturalartistic goals. With mounting reports from across North America arguing that provincial, state and municipal tax credit programmes do not recuperate their investments, that they create volatile industries and tenuous employment conditions dependent on the continuation and competitiveness of their subsidies, "tax credit thinking" is becoming an increasingly risky line of defense for industry advocates and film workers. It might be the case, in fact, that this line of defense is putting regional film industries in jeopardy. Ironically, one of the most significant effects of regional film incentive policies might turn out to be that they have created the very conditions, discourses and measures of success that are beginning to dismantle them.NOVA SCOTIA, FOR EXAMPLE2015 may well be remembered as the year that the screen industries went dormant in Nova Scotia. While some policy decisions have gradual effects, the provincial Liberal government s 9 April announcement that it would be eliminating the Nova Scotia Film Tax Credit (NS FTC) on 1 July had immediate and seismic effects. Right away, the loss of the 20 year-old incentive programme that, at its height, subsidized up to 65% of a film's qualifying labour costs through a refundable tax credit, was held responsible for film projects pulling out of the province.2 In August, citing a "sharp decline" in production, two of the three major equipment providers announced that they would be closing their Nova Scotia offices. John DeBoer, COO of SIM Group, justified the decision to Playback saying, "[tjhere hasn't been a slowdown of work... there is absolutely no work in the film industry... and we see very little coming down the pipeline."3 In September, a Halifax editorial coinciding with the 40th Atlantic Film Festival argued that the impact of the cancelled programme fundamentally "disrupted a production ecosystem that evolved over decades," a delicate and interrelated tripartite of production incentives, infrastructure, and skilled workers. …
分享
查看原文
屏幕停在这里!税收抵免思维与“本土”电影制作的当代意义
我住在新斯科舍省的哈利法克斯,和其他地方一样,这个地方的文化政策已经建立和重建了很多次。想想哈利法克斯的中心地标,一座被称为城堡的港口堡垒。它最初被认为是18世纪英国的殖民地战略,用来抵御法国和后来的美国“入侵者”,它现在的版本是加拿大的国家历史遗址和旅游景点。该网站现在归加拿大公园管理局所有,试图吸引曾经被它排斥的“游客”。在支付了入场费后,每位游客都会收到一份叙述,该叙述将殖民军国主义战略性地置于国家历史中,可以用加拿大两种官方语言中的一种来传达。作为一个活生生的政策产物,城堡不仅仅是一个历史遗址。可以说,它仍然是一个活跃的堡垒,在战略上捍卫着这个民族国家关于加拿大史前历史的半官方话语。每天中午时分,城堡的炮声响彻整个城市和周围的市镇。在这样做的过程中,该网站的政策回响继续维护自己,从字面上和比喻上标志着现在的时间。然而,政策的反响往往会产生不经意的影响。在接下来的文章中,我探讨了省级税收抵免政策的观点,这些政策激励了区域电影产业的发展,也改变了区域电影制作的景观和话语,以至于这些政策变得难以辩护。我提出这一理论,是为了解释去年新斯科舍省电影奖励计划突然而情绪化的变化,以及行业倡导者用来抗议这些变化的主要修辞立场。辩论双方都使用了一种话语来捍卫自己的立场,我称之为“税收抵免思维”。也就是说,双方都将地区电影制作的目的与工业经济而非文化艺术目标紧密地联系在一起。来自北美各地的越来越多的报告认为,省、州和市的税收抵免计划无法收回投资,它们创造了不稳定的行业,以及依赖于补贴的持续和竞争力的脆弱就业条件。对于行业倡导者和电影工作者来说,“税收抵免思维”正成为一条风险越来越大的防线。事实上,这条防线可能会将地区电影产业置于危险之中。具有讽刺意味的是,地区电影激励政策最重要的影响之一可能是,它们创造的条件、话语和成功措施正开始瓦解它们。2015年很可能会被人们记住,因为这一年新斯科舍省的屏幕行业进入了休眠状态。虽然一些政策决定的影响是渐进的,但该省自由党政府4月9日宣布将于7月1日取消新斯科舍省电影税收抵免(NS FTC),这一决定产生了立竿见影的影响。20年的激励计划,在其鼎盛时期,通过可退还的税收抵免补贴高达65%的电影合格劳动力成本,立即被认为是电影项目退出该省的原因今年8月,由于产量“急剧下降”,三家主要设备供应商中的两家宣布将关闭在新斯科舍省的办事处。SIM Group的首席运营官John DeBoer向Playback解释了这一决定的理由,他说:“(我们的工作并没有放缓……电影行业绝对没有工作……我们看到的是,这方面的进展很少。9月,哈利法克斯的一篇社论在第40届大西洋电影节召开之际指出,被取消的节目的影响从根本上“破坏了几十年来发展起来的制作生态系统”,这是一个由制作动机、基础设施和熟练工人组成的微妙而相互关联的三方关系。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信