{"title":"EU Solidarity, Illustrated by the Covid-19 Crisis","authors":"Anne Joppe","doi":"10.36633/ulr.683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Solidarity between the Member States of the EU is mostly called upon during times of crisis, as also now during the Covid-19 pandemic. In this article, the definition and importance of solidarity is studied with a focus on the internal market. It appears that solidarity does not have one unequivocal meaning, but that its importance and value depend per EU policy area. Yet, it is noteworthy that elements of reciprocity and altruism lie at the core of the value. In the context of the internal market, the principle is not referred to in the specific Treaty provisions on the fundamental freedoms. However, solidarity and the idea behind it can be enforced through the principle of loyalty within the meaning of Article 4(3) TEU. The reaction of the Union and the Member States to the Covid-19 outbreak illustrates how solidarity is reflected during crises. Studying the recent actions seems to confirm the conclusion that solidarity within the single market is rather a political aspiration, that is not legally binding or enforceable by itself. However, one could argue that this requires change, since it follows from the current pandemic that solidarity is crucial for the resilience of the internal market in times of crisis. The principle of loyalty can indeed play an instrumental role here and can be used to enforce the objectives of solidarity. © 2021. The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.","PeriodicalId":44535,"journal":{"name":"Utrecht Law Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utrecht Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.683","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
2019冠状病毒病危机体现的欧盟团结
在危机时期,欧盟成员国之间最需要的是团结一致,现在在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间也是如此。本文以内部市场为重点,研究了团结的定义和重要性。团结似乎没有一个明确的含义,但其重要性和价值取决于每个欧盟政策领域。然而,值得注意的是,互惠和利他主义的元素是价值的核心。在内部市场方面,《条约》关于基本自由的具体条款中没有提到这一原则。然而,团结及其背后的理念可以通过第4(3)条TEU意义上的忠诚原则来实施。欧盟和会员国对2019冠状病毒病疫情的反应表明,在危机期间如何体现团结。研究最近的行动似乎证实了这样一个结论:单一市场内的团结与其说是一种政治愿望,不如说是一种政治愿望,本身没有法律约束力或强制性。然而,有人可能会说,这需要改变,因为从目前的大流行中可以看出,团结对于危机时期内部市场的复原力至关重要。忠诚原则确实可以在这里发挥工具性作用,可以用来加强团结的目标。©2021。作者(年代)。这是一篇根据知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议(CC-BY 4.0)发布的开放获取文章,该协议允许在任何媒体上不受限制地使用、分发和复制,前提是要注明原作者和来源。见http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。