求助PDF
{"title":"Striking the Right Chord: A Theoretical Approach to Balancing Artists' Intellectual Property Rights on Remix Audio-Sharing Platforms","authors":"Nicole Greenstein","doi":"10.31228/osf.io/rq5cx","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 R I. BACKGROUND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 R A. The Rise of Remix Culture and the Copyright Backlash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 216 R B. Licensing Sampling-Based Music . . . . . . . . . . . . . 218 R C. Remixes and the Fair Use Defense . . . . . . . . . . . . 219 R II. A REMIXER’S LABOR OF LOVE: LOCKEAN THEORY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 221 R A. An Introduction to Locke’s Labor Theory . . . . . . 221 R B. A Lockean Approach to Intellectual Property and Remix Rights . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 223 R C. The Law of Accession and the Improving Remixer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 226 R III. FOSTERING MUSICAL CREATION: UTILITARIAN THEORIES OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 R A. The Tragedy of the Free Rider . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 229 R B. The Freedom in the Commons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232 R IV. THE SOUL BEHIND THE SONGS: PERSONHOOD THEORY OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 234 R A. An Introduction to Personhood Theory . . . . . . . . 234 R B. The Personhood Right in Remix Culture . . . . . . . 235 R CONCLUSION: SOLVING THE REMIX RIGHTS STALEMATE . . . . . . . . 237 R","PeriodicalId":51518,"journal":{"name":"Cornell Law Review","volume":"102 1","pages":"211"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cornell Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31228/osf.io/rq5cx","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
拨动正确的心弦:混音共享平台中艺术家知识产权平衡的理论途径
简介。212背景。216 R.A.混音文化的兴起与版权风波。216 R.B.许可基于采样的音乐。218 R.C.汇款和合理使用辩护。219 R II。混音师的爱的劳动:洛克知识产权理论。221 R A.洛克劳动理论导论。221 R.B.知识产权和汇款权的Lockean方法。223 R.C.加入法和改进的汇款人。226 R III.促进音乐创作:知识产权的功利主义理论。229 R.A.自由骑士的悲剧。229 R.B.下议院的自由。232歌曲背后的灵魂:知识产权人格理论。234 R.A.人格理论导论。234 R.B.混音文化中的人格权。235 R结论:解决混音权僵局。237 R
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。