Metodologia de Cuidado Humanitude: Benefícios e desafios da sua implementação na prática

IF 0.4 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
C. Fonseca, Helena Luz, Rosa Cândida Melo
{"title":"Metodologia de Cuidado Humanitude: Benefícios e desafios da sua implementação na prática","authors":"C. Fonseca, Helena Luz, Rosa Cândida Melo","doi":"10.31211/RPICS.2021.7.1.200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Identify the perception of professionals regarding the benefits and difficulties of implementing the Methodology of Care Humanitude (MCH) in Residential homes for older people care practice. Method: This is an exploratory and descriptive study of a qualitative nature, covering a sample of three interlocutors with experience in the formation and implementation of MCH. Data collection was carried out through a mixed questionnaire, with open questions being interpreted using the content analysis technique. Results: The benefits of MCH relate to the people cared for (e.g., increased acceptance of care), to formal caregivers/collaborators (e.g., reduced absenteeism), as well as to the organizational system (changing the culture of care). The challenges arise internally (e.g., appropriation of techniques, resistance to change) and externally (e.g., training of professionals, organization of care focused on the task). Conclusions: MCH is an approach centered on interaction with the person being cared for, with benefits that span the entire organizational context. Its implementation translates opportunities for the daily practice of care, encompassing the people cared for and the teams providing care, influencing the organizational context. MCH represents a change in the care paradigm; however, there are several challenges to its implementation in practice, which suggests that greater involvement of all care interlocutors is suggested, namely the formal leaders of institutions and agents of public policies.","PeriodicalId":52016,"journal":{"name":"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social","volume":"7 1","pages":"14–24-14–24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Portuguesa de Investigacao Comportamental e Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31211/RPICS.2021.7.1.200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: Identify the perception of professionals regarding the benefits and difficulties of implementing the Methodology of Care Humanitude (MCH) in Residential homes for older people care practice. Method: This is an exploratory and descriptive study of a qualitative nature, covering a sample of three interlocutors with experience in the formation and implementation of MCH. Data collection was carried out through a mixed questionnaire, with open questions being interpreted using the content analysis technique. Results: The benefits of MCH relate to the people cared for (e.g., increased acceptance of care), to formal caregivers/collaborators (e.g., reduced absenteeism), as well as to the organizational system (changing the culture of care). The challenges arise internally (e.g., appropriation of techniques, resistance to change) and externally (e.g., training of professionals, organization of care focused on the task). Conclusions: MCH is an approach centered on interaction with the person being cared for, with benefits that span the entire organizational context. Its implementation translates opportunities for the daily practice of care, encompassing the people cared for and the teams providing care, influencing the organizational context. MCH represents a change in the care paradigm; however, there are several challenges to its implementation in practice, which suggests that greater involvement of all care interlocutors is suggested, namely the formal leaders of institutions and agents of public policies.
人性化护理方法:在实践中实施的好处和挑战
目的:确定专业人员对在养老院护理实践中实施人性化护理方法(MCH)的好处和困难的看法。方法:这是一项定性的探索性和描述性研究,涵盖了三个具有形成和实施妇幼保健经验的对话者的样本。数据收集通过混合问卷进行,使用内容分析技术解释开放式问题。结果:妇幼保健的好处涉及到被照顾的人(例如,增加了对护理的接受度),对正式照顾者/合作者(例如,减少了缺勤)以及组织系统(改变了护理文化)。挑战来自内部(例如,技术的挪用,对变革的抵制)和外部(例如,专业人员的培训,专注于任务的护理组织)。结论:MCH是一种以与被照顾者互动为中心的方法,其益处跨越整个组织环境。它的实施转化为日常护理实践的机会,包括被照顾的人和提供护理的团队,影响组织环境。妇幼保健代表了护理模式的变化;然而,在实践中实施该计划存在一些挑战,这表明建议所有护理对话者,即机构的正式领导人和公共政策代理人更多地参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信