Managing Diabetes, Managing Medicine: Chronic Disease and Clinical Bureaucracy in Post-War Britain by Martin D. Moore (review)

IF 0.4 Q3 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
I. Miller
{"title":"Managing Diabetes, Managing Medicine: Chronic Disease and Clinical Bureaucracy in Post-War Britain by Martin D. Moore (review)","authors":"I. Miller","doi":"10.3138/cbmh.337-022019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CBMH / BCHM 36.2 2019 p. 498–500 doi: 10.3138/cbmh.337-022019 profession: in many cases, patients appeared to accept the doctors far more readily than the establishment did. Simpson describes the professional constraints experienced by these practitioners, who were often obliged to care for large numbers of patients living in socio-economically deprived areas, frequently with little support from the establishment. He also suggests that this may have led to political activism amongst some of the migrant doctors, as well as fostering the development of mutual support organizations. By bringing his themes together, Simpson raises the profile of the South Asian doctors in the history of the NHS, suggesting that they were saviours of general practice in many geographical areas, as well as innovators. He argues that Britain has never been self-sufficient in its medical workforce, and that international medical migration will always be necessary to staff the NHS. There is also a brief discussion of how the Indian government began to resent the reduction of its workforce during this period; this is perhaps a topic that would benefit from further research. In his preface, Simpson claims to offer a coherent, academic analysis of this previously neglected area of British general practice history, whilst also attempting to appeal to a non-academic audience. The latter aim is realized through the use of the narrative voices of his subjects to explain, and sometimes challenge, accepted historiography. As a result, this book is accessible not just to academic medical historians (who will appreciate the extensive bibliography and explanatory notes), but also to the general reader looking to explore this era of post-colonial medicine. Simpson’s book delivers a comprehensive account of his research, as well as pointing the way towards future studies in this field; as such, it is to be recommended.","PeriodicalId":55634,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Bulletin of Medical History","volume":"36 1","pages":"498 - 500"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Bulletin of Medical History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cbmh.337-022019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

CBMH / BCHM 36.2 2019 p. 498–500 doi: 10.3138/cbmh.337-022019 profession: in many cases, patients appeared to accept the doctors far more readily than the establishment did. Simpson describes the professional constraints experienced by these practitioners, who were often obliged to care for large numbers of patients living in socio-economically deprived areas, frequently with little support from the establishment. He also suggests that this may have led to political activism amongst some of the migrant doctors, as well as fostering the development of mutual support organizations. By bringing his themes together, Simpson raises the profile of the South Asian doctors in the history of the NHS, suggesting that they were saviours of general practice in many geographical areas, as well as innovators. He argues that Britain has never been self-sufficient in its medical workforce, and that international medical migration will always be necessary to staff the NHS. There is also a brief discussion of how the Indian government began to resent the reduction of its workforce during this period; this is perhaps a topic that would benefit from further research. In his preface, Simpson claims to offer a coherent, academic analysis of this previously neglected area of British general practice history, whilst also attempting to appeal to a non-academic audience. The latter aim is realized through the use of the narrative voices of his subjects to explain, and sometimes challenge, accepted historiography. As a result, this book is accessible not just to academic medical historians (who will appreciate the extensive bibliography and explanatory notes), but also to the general reader looking to explore this era of post-colonial medicine. Simpson’s book delivers a comprehensive account of his research, as well as pointing the way towards future studies in this field; as such, it is to be recommended.
管理糖尿病,管理医学:战后英国的慢性疾病和临床官僚主义
CBMH / BCHM 36.2 2019 p. 498-500 doi: 10.3138/ CBMH。职业:在许多情况下,患者似乎比机构更容易接受医生。辛普森描述了这些从业人员所经历的专业限制,他们经常不得不照顾生活在社会经济贫困地区的大量患者,往往很少得到机构的支持。他还认为,这可能导致了一些流动医生的政治激进主义,并促进了相互支持组织的发展。通过将他的主题结合在一起,辛普森提高了南亚医生在NHS历史上的形象,表明他们是许多地理区域的全科医生的救星,也是创新者。他认为,英国的医疗队伍从来没有自给自足过,国际医疗移民对NHS的员工来说永远是必要的。也有一个简短的讨论,印度政府如何开始怨恨在此期间减少其劳动力;这也许是一个将受益于进一步研究的主题。在他的序言中,辛普森声称要对这个以前被忽视的英国全科医生历史领域提供一个连贯的学术分析,同时也试图吸引非学术观众。后者的目的是通过使用他的主题的叙事声音来解释,有时是挑战,公认的史学。因此,这本书不仅适合学术医学历史学家(他们会欣赏广泛的参考书目和解释性注释),也适合普通读者探索这个后殖民医学时代。辛普森的书对他的研究进行了全面的介绍,并指出了该领域未来研究的方向;因此,这是值得推荐的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Canadian Bulletin of Medical History
Canadian Bulletin of Medical History HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: The Canadian Bulletin of Medical History / Bulletin canadien d"histoire de la médecine is the official organ of the Canadian Society for the History of Medicine/ Société canadienne d"histoire de la médecine and is the primary outlet in Canada for refereed scholarship in the history of medicine. This journal, published twice yearly, presents articles, notes, review articles, and book reviews in French and in English. No aspect of the general field is excluded as a matter of policy, though the particular focus is on scholarship in Canadian medical history.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信