{"title":"A novel AMFMEA approach to identify most critical component and decision making approach for combining NDTS for screw compressor","authors":"Ashish Khaira, R. Dwivedi","doi":"10.30765/er.1685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To ensure higher reliability, it is necessary to identify the most prominent cause of failure. It was observed in multiple works that most of the researchers used failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) and failure mode and effect criticality analysis (FMECA) but these approaches contain lots of hindrances. Alternatively, the MATRIX FMEA approach applied to identify the most prominent cause of failure and critical sub-component prone to that particular failure. The matrix FMEA developed for design engineers so that they can identify the potential cause of failures and design-out them in new product design. The central idea of this research is to apply this approach to maintenance, since the potential failure mode and the affected components were known. In most research, a single component such as a cylinder or turbocharger is used for analysis, but this research targets an entire machine. Multiple researchers also highlighted that the combination of non-destructive testing (NDT) provides better results instead of single NDT. Multiple researchers also highlighted the suitability of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) for decision making (DM). Therefore, this work covered firstly, a novel AMFMEA (AHP-Matrix FMEA) to identify the most critical component of particular machinery located in a heavy industrial setup and secondly, DM approach for combining NDTs. It was observed that the incorporation of AHP in Matrix-FMEA improved its analytical ability and reduced overall computation time. This work also provided the guideline with a detailed procedure for combining NDTs.","PeriodicalId":44022,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30765/er.1685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To ensure higher reliability, it is necessary to identify the most prominent cause of failure. It was observed in multiple works that most of the researchers used failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) and failure mode and effect criticality analysis (FMECA) but these approaches contain lots of hindrances. Alternatively, the MATRIX FMEA approach applied to identify the most prominent cause of failure and critical sub-component prone to that particular failure. The matrix FMEA developed for design engineers so that they can identify the potential cause of failures and design-out them in new product design. The central idea of this research is to apply this approach to maintenance, since the potential failure mode and the affected components were known. In most research, a single component such as a cylinder or turbocharger is used for analysis, but this research targets an entire machine. Multiple researchers also highlighted that the combination of non-destructive testing (NDT) provides better results instead of single NDT. Multiple researchers also highlighted the suitability of the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and preference ranking organization method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) for decision making (DM). Therefore, this work covered firstly, a novel AMFMEA (AHP-Matrix FMEA) to identify the most critical component of particular machinery located in a heavy industrial setup and secondly, DM approach for combining NDTs. It was observed that the incorporation of AHP in Matrix-FMEA improved its analytical ability and reduced overall computation time. This work also provided the guideline with a detailed procedure for combining NDTs.
期刊介绍:
Engineering Review is an international journal designed to foster the exchange of ideas and transfer of knowledge between scientists and engineers involved in various engineering sciences that deal with investigations related to design, materials, technology, maintenance and manufacturing processes. It is not limited to the specific details of science and engineering but is instead devoted to a very wide range of subfields in the engineering sciences. It provides an appropriate resort for publishing the papers covering prior applications – based on the research topics comprising the entire engineering spectrum. Topics of particular interest thus include: mechanical engineering, naval architecture and marine engineering, fundamental engineering sciences, electrical engineering, computer sciences and civil engineering. Manuscripts addressing other issues may also be considered if they relate to engineering oriented subjects. The contributions, which may be analytical, numerical or experimental, should be of significance to the progress of mentioned topics. Papers that are merely illustrations of established principles or procedures generally will not be accepted. Occasionally, the magazine is ready to publish high-quality-selected papers from the conference after being renovated, expanded and written in accordance with the rules of the magazine. The high standard of excellence for any of published papers will be ensured by peer-review procedure. The journal takes into consideration only original scientific papers.