Power and contexts: Some societal conditions for organisational action research – Clashes between economic-management and pedagogic-social discourses

Q3 Social Sciences
M. Kristiansen, Jørgen Bloch-Poulsen
{"title":"Power and contexts: Some societal conditions for organisational action research – Clashes between economic-management and pedagogic-social discourses","authors":"M. Kristiansen, Jørgen Bloch-Poulsen","doi":"10.3224/ijar.v10i3.26657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on action research co-operation with a team of teachers at a Social and Healthcare College in Denmark 2012-2013, the article raises the question: What are the conditions for organisational action research projects in a neoliberal context? The article has three purposes. Firstly, we want to show that mapping and delimitating relevant contexts are critical in an organisational AR project, because it is always arbitrary what you delimit as your field of inquiry, initially. The consequences of ignoring this in the project described were fatal. Secondly, the article draws attention to clashes between two societal Discourses: an economic-management Discourse versus a pedagogic-social Discourse. Unfortunately, we were not aware of the strength and the extent of the economic-management Discourse before it was too late. Thirdly, the article speaks in favor of continuous context inquiring dialogues with immediate and additional stakeholders questioning, among others, if the action research project is practicable at all.","PeriodicalId":39289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Action Research","volume":"10 1","pages":"339-375"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3224/ijar.v10i3.26657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Based on action research co-operation with a team of teachers at a Social and Healthcare College in Denmark 2012-2013, the article raises the question: What are the conditions for organisational action research projects in a neoliberal context? The article has three purposes. Firstly, we want to show that mapping and delimitating relevant contexts are critical in an organisational AR project, because it is always arbitrary what you delimit as your field of inquiry, initially. The consequences of ignoring this in the project described were fatal. Secondly, the article draws attention to clashes between two societal Discourses: an economic-management Discourse versus a pedagogic-social Discourse. Unfortunately, we were not aware of the strength and the extent of the economic-management Discourse before it was too late. Thirdly, the article speaks in favor of continuous context inquiring dialogues with immediate and additional stakeholders questioning, among others, if the action research project is practicable at all.
权力和语境:组织行动研究的一些社会条件-经济-管理和教学-社会话语之间的冲突
基于2012-2013年与丹麦一所社会和医疗学院的一组教师的行动研究合作,本文提出了一个问题:在新自由主义背景下,组织行动研究项目的条件是什么?这篇文章有三个目的。首先,我们想表明,映射和划定相关上下文在组织AR项目中是至关重要的,因为最初你划定的调查领域总是任意的。在所描述的项目中忽略这一点的后果是致命的。其次,文章关注了两种社会话语之间的冲突:经济-管理话语与教育-社会话语。不幸的是,在为时已晚之前,我们没有意识到经济管理话语的力量和范围。第三,本文赞成与直接和额外的利益相关者进行持续的背景询问对话,询问行动研究项目是否可行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Action Research
International Journal of Action Research Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信