Justice, sustainability, and participation

Q3 Social Sciences
P. Reason
{"title":"Justice, sustainability, and participation","authors":"P. Reason","doi":"10.3224/IJAR.V10I3.26655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vice Chancellor, dear friends, thank you for coming.Before I start, I would like offer my appreciations. I am honoured by the University and the School by my professorship. I am grateful to the School of Management for providing a home where I have been able to develop my thinking and educational practice. Diversity is a mark and a healthy ecosystem, and I think it is part of our strength that we provide space for those who want to think about questions of justice, sustainability, and participation as well as about profit and globalisation. I am also slightly overwhelmed by the kindness I have received.Justice, sustainability and participation are three huge words. When I was asked for a title for this lecture I chose them quite easily as representing the themes of my work. As I have attempted to craft them into a lecture for this diverse audience I have found out how complex they are. I want to talk about the state of our world and the way our mind frames and understands that world. Let me start with a story.Recently I went on a Buddhist meditation retreat in the Chinese Ch'an tradition. On this retreat, in addition to the usual meditation practice to calm and quieten our minds, we were invited to work with a koan. Ko ans, I learned, are short stories, usually of a paradoxical nature, that the trainee is invited to hold in the mind. Since the koan is essentially paradoxical, the point is not to solve it but to allow insights to arise as one watches the mind work with the koan. In the end, it is hoped, the paradox is cut through...The koan I worked with goes like this:It was a hot, summer day, the windows and verandahs of the Ch'an hall were open to the surrounding lawns and trees. The Master climbed the pulpit and raised his fly whisk (hossu) to indicate he was about to give his sermon. At that moment a bird began to sing in the garden. The Master stood with his hossu motionless. The bird went on singing. Eventually the song ceased. The Master lowered his hossu. He said, 'Oh monks: that will be all for today,' and returned to his room.This really is an everyday story of monastery life, but it has resonances in our own everyday culture. We are all from time to time startled from our everyday preoccupations by the sound of birdsong, by the sound of raindrops, or by the silence of snow. On Monday I was arrested, so to speak, by the sound of the hailstorm on the railway station roof. So what is this story about?I sat in meditation with this story for seven days.My first line of inquiry, which is linked to my theme of sustainability, is that the koan tells us that we can leam more from the more than human world than from the wise words of the Masters. Christ told us to 'consider the lilies of the field'. Meister Eckhart in the Christian Mystic tradition tells us that every creature is a word of God and a book about God (Fox, 1983, p. 14). The Sufi poet Hafiz wrote (Hafiz, 1999, p. 269), 'every being is God speaking... why not be polite and listen to him?But what is the birdsong saying to us and how are we to listen? Let's go a little deeperThe koan reminds me that today we have very little (consciously) to do with the other than human: we live with other humans, with our own humanmade technologies, with a human-made countryside. We can scarcely see the stars. This is a precarious situation, for 'We need that which is other than ourselves and our own creations... we are human only in contact, and conviviality, with that which is not human' (Abram, 1996, p. ix). And songbirds are in catastrophic decline, so this sweet story both masks and points toward the tragedy of the current loss of species. We must, I thought, leam to listen to the wild. But the bird is not in the wild, it is singing in a cultivated garden; and is heard through the windows and verandahs of the Ch'an hall by monks waiting to hear a sermon. How can we hear the wild if its voice is so radically filtered through our own frames and perspectives: through the 'windows of my mind', as Simon and Garfunkel put it. …","PeriodicalId":39289,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Action Research","volume":"10 1","pages":"284-309"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3224/IJAR.V10I3.26655","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Vice Chancellor, dear friends, thank you for coming.Before I start, I would like offer my appreciations. I am honoured by the University and the School by my professorship. I am grateful to the School of Management for providing a home where I have been able to develop my thinking and educational practice. Diversity is a mark and a healthy ecosystem, and I think it is part of our strength that we provide space for those who want to think about questions of justice, sustainability, and participation as well as about profit and globalisation. I am also slightly overwhelmed by the kindness I have received.Justice, sustainability and participation are three huge words. When I was asked for a title for this lecture I chose them quite easily as representing the themes of my work. As I have attempted to craft them into a lecture for this diverse audience I have found out how complex they are. I want to talk about the state of our world and the way our mind frames and understands that world. Let me start with a story.Recently I went on a Buddhist meditation retreat in the Chinese Ch'an tradition. On this retreat, in addition to the usual meditation practice to calm and quieten our minds, we were invited to work with a koan. Ko ans, I learned, are short stories, usually of a paradoxical nature, that the trainee is invited to hold in the mind. Since the koan is essentially paradoxical, the point is not to solve it but to allow insights to arise as one watches the mind work with the koan. In the end, it is hoped, the paradox is cut through...The koan I worked with goes like this:It was a hot, summer day, the windows and verandahs of the Ch'an hall were open to the surrounding lawns and trees. The Master climbed the pulpit and raised his fly whisk (hossu) to indicate he was about to give his sermon. At that moment a bird began to sing in the garden. The Master stood with his hossu motionless. The bird went on singing. Eventually the song ceased. The Master lowered his hossu. He said, 'Oh monks: that will be all for today,' and returned to his room.This really is an everyday story of monastery life, but it has resonances in our own everyday culture. We are all from time to time startled from our everyday preoccupations by the sound of birdsong, by the sound of raindrops, or by the silence of snow. On Monday I was arrested, so to speak, by the sound of the hailstorm on the railway station roof. So what is this story about?I sat in meditation with this story for seven days.My first line of inquiry, which is linked to my theme of sustainability, is that the koan tells us that we can leam more from the more than human world than from the wise words of the Masters. Christ told us to 'consider the lilies of the field'. Meister Eckhart in the Christian Mystic tradition tells us that every creature is a word of God and a book about God (Fox, 1983, p. 14). The Sufi poet Hafiz wrote (Hafiz, 1999, p. 269), 'every being is God speaking... why not be polite and listen to him?But what is the birdsong saying to us and how are we to listen? Let's go a little deeperThe koan reminds me that today we have very little (consciously) to do with the other than human: we live with other humans, with our own humanmade technologies, with a human-made countryside. We can scarcely see the stars. This is a precarious situation, for 'We need that which is other than ourselves and our own creations... we are human only in contact, and conviviality, with that which is not human' (Abram, 1996, p. ix). And songbirds are in catastrophic decline, so this sweet story both masks and points toward the tragedy of the current loss of species. We must, I thought, leam to listen to the wild. But the bird is not in the wild, it is singing in a cultivated garden; and is heard through the windows and verandahs of the Ch'an hall by monks waiting to hear a sermon. How can we hear the wild if its voice is so radically filtered through our own frames and perspectives: through the 'windows of my mind', as Simon and Garfunkel put it. …
公正、可持续性和参与
副校长,亲爱的朋友们,感谢你们的到来。在我开始之前,我想表达我的感激之情。我为大学和学院的教授职位感到荣幸。我非常感谢管理学院为我提供了一个能够发展我的思想和教育实践的家。多样性是一个标志,也是一个健康的生态系统。我认为,我们为那些想要思考正义、可持续性、参与以及利润和全球化问题的人提供空间,这是我们优势的一部分。我也被我所受到的善意所感动。公正、可持续性和参与是三个大词。当我被要求为这次讲座取一个题目时,我很容易地选择了它们,因为它们代表了我工作的主题。当我试图将它们精心制作成一篇演讲,面向不同的听众时,我发现它们是多么复杂。我想谈谈我们的世界以及我们的思维构造和理解世界的方式。让我以一个故事开始。最近我参加了一个中国传统的佛教禅修活动。在这次静修中,除了通常的冥想练习来平静和安静我们的思想外,我们还被邀请与公案一起工作。我了解到,Ko - ans是一种短小的故事,通常具有自相矛盾的性质,学员们被邀请将其记在心里。既然公案本质上是矛盾的,关键不在于解决它,而在于当一个人观察心与公案一起工作时,让洞察生起。最后,人们希望这个悖论能够被打破。我研究的公案是这样的:那是一个炎热的夏日,禅堂的窗户和阳台对着周围的草坪和树木。大师爬上讲坛,举起他的飞拂(hossu),表示他要布道了。就在这时,一只鸟开始在花园里唱歌。大师站在那里,他的手一动也不动。鸟儿继续歌唱。最后歌声停止了。大师放下了他的帽子。他说:“哦,和尚们,今天就到这里吧。”然后回到自己的房间。这确实是一个修道院生活的日常故事,但它在我们自己的日常文化中有共鸣。我们都不时地被鸟鸣声、雨声或寂静的雪声从日常的关注中惊醒。星期一,我被火车站屋顶上冰雹的声音逮捕了。那么这个故事是关于什么的呢?我花了七天时间冥想这个故事。我的第一个问题,与我的可持续主题有关,是公案告诉我们,我们可以从超越人类的世界中学到更多,而不是从大师的智慧之言中学到更多。基督告诉我们要“留心田野里的百合花”。Meister Eckhart在基督教神秘主义传统中告诉我们,每一个生物都是上帝的话语,是一本关于上帝的书(Fox, 1983,第14页)。苏菲派诗人哈菲兹(Hafiz, 1999, p. 269)写道:“每一个存在都是真主在说话……为什么不礼貌一点,听他的话呢?但是,鸟儿的歌声对我们说了什么?我们该如何倾听呢?这个公案提醒我,今天我们几乎没有(有意识地)与人类以外的人有任何关系:我们与其他人类生活在一起,与我们自己的人造技术生活在一起,与一个人造的乡村生活在一起。我们几乎看不到星星。这是一个不稳定的情况,因为我们需要的是除了我们自己和我们自己的创造之外的东西……我们是人类,只是在与非人类的接触和欢乐中”(亚伯兰,1996,第ix页)。鸣禽的数量正在灾难性地减少,所以这个甜蜜的故事既掩盖了也指出了当前物种灭绝的悲剧。我想,我们必须学会倾听大自然的声音。但鸟儿不是在野外,而是在开垦的花园里歌唱;从禅堂的窗户和阳台上可以听到等待听布道的僧侣们的声音。如果荒野的声音如此彻底地通过我们自己的框架和视角过滤,我们怎么能听到它呢?正如西蒙和加芬克尔所说,通过“我的心灵之窗”。...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Action Research
International Journal of Action Research Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信