Society as Representation: Durkheim, Psychology and the 'Dualism of Human Nature'

Q2 Arts and Humanities
S. Falasca‐Zamponi
{"title":"Society as Representation: Durkheim, Psychology and the 'Dualism of Human Nature'","authors":"S. Falasca‐Zamponi","doi":"10.3167/DS.2014.200103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Against readings that have emphasized Durkheim’s sociological realism and reductionism, this article examines the role of individuality and psychology in his theory. In particular, Durkheim’s approach to representations is the proof of the crucial importance he assigned to mental processes in the construction of social life. Durkheim showed the relation of representations to the collectivity – how ideas promote the sense of community – and in this context he emphasized their epistemological ramifications. Specifically, he pointed to a series of dualisms that remained unexplained by psychological analysis, including the one posing rational against affective logic. While arguing for the preeminence of ideas in Durkheim’s view of society, the article also recognizes the limitations that marred his efforts at reconciling the individual with society. Most notably, his genetic approach and his account of the central role of affect in the creation of the social made Durkheim vulnerable to criticism. Even his late essay on the dualism of human nature, which testifies to his lifelong confrontations with psychology, left a whole set of questions unanswered about his theory’s applicability to historical forms of institutionalization of the social, especially in modernity.","PeriodicalId":35254,"journal":{"name":"Durkheimian Studies/Etudes durkheimiennes","volume":"20 1","pages":"43-63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3167/DS.2014.200103","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Durkheimian Studies/Etudes durkheimiennes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/DS.2014.200103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

: Against readings that have emphasized Durkheim’s sociological realism and reductionism, this article examines the role of individuality and psychology in his theory. In particular, Durkheim’s approach to representations is the proof of the crucial importance he assigned to mental processes in the construction of social life. Durkheim showed the relation of representations to the collectivity – how ideas promote the sense of community – and in this context he emphasized their epistemological ramifications. Specifically, he pointed to a series of dualisms that remained unexplained by psychological analysis, including the one posing rational against affective logic. While arguing for the preeminence of ideas in Durkheim’s view of society, the article also recognizes the limitations that marred his efforts at reconciling the individual with society. Most notably, his genetic approach and his account of the central role of affect in the creation of the social made Durkheim vulnerable to criticism. Even his late essay on the dualism of human nature, which testifies to his lifelong confrontations with psychology, left a whole set of questions unanswered about his theory’s applicability to historical forms of institutionalization of the social, especially in modernity.
作为表征的社会:涂尔干、心理学与“人性二元论”
针对强调迪尔凯姆的社会学现实主义和还原论的阅读,本文考察了个性和心理学在他的理论中的作用。特别是,迪尔凯姆的表征方法证明了他在社会生活建构中赋予心理过程的关键重要性。迪尔凯姆展示了表象与集体的关系——思想如何促进共同体意识——在这种背景下,他强调了表象与集体的认识论分支。具体来说,他指出了一系列心理学分析无法解释的二元论,包括理性与情感逻辑对立的二元论。在论证迪尔凯姆的社会观点中思想的卓越性的同时,文章也认识到损害了他在调和个人与社会方面的努力的局限性。最值得注意的是,他的遗传方法和他对社会创造中情感的中心作用的描述使涂尔干容易受到批评。即使是他最后一篇关于人性二元论的论文,证明了他一生与心理学的对抗,也留下了一系列关于他的理论是否适用于社会制度化的历史形式的问题,特别是在现代性中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Durkheimian Studies/Etudes durkheimiennes
Durkheimian Studies/Etudes durkheimiennes Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信