{"title":"Preparing to eradicate a novel invader of unknown biology: a case study from Australia","authors":"Benjamin Hoffmann, Marc Widmer, Olivia Bates","doi":"10.3391/mbi.2023.14.3.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although there have been many attempts at eradicating exotic ant incursions, most efforts have been unsuccessful, and a lack of specific biological knowledge is believed to have been a major contributing factor. In early May 2013, an exotic ant species, Lepisiota frauenfeldi , was found for the first time in Australia. Identifying the species proved difficult, and little biological information about the species was available. In making the decision to eradicate and develop the treatment protocols, four assumptions were made about the ant’s biology. Here we detail rapid and basic research that was used to assess the assumptions underpinning the decision to eradicate, contribute to determine some eradication protocols for this understudied species, as well as how our understanding increased following the discovery of two other incursions of this species in Australia. The research found that all initial assumptions of the ant’s biology used in the original eradication plan were wrong. Distribution modelling found the ant could potentially inhabit a larger area than first thought, and updating the model with the subsequent incursions greatly increased the area of suitable climate in Australia. The ant’s foraging and reproductive regimes were not as expected, so too its nutrition pathways to queens, which had implications for the treatments. Our work serves as a clear warning for invasive species practitioners that management decisions that are based on assumptions, “gut feelings” or knowledge based on information from elsewhere in the world, or from other species, can be expected to be flawed. Rapid, small-scale and strategic research conducted on-site can enhance management outcomes.","PeriodicalId":54262,"journal":{"name":"Management of Biological Invasions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management of Biological Invasions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2023.14.3.03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Although there have been many attempts at eradicating exotic ant incursions, most efforts have been unsuccessful, and a lack of specific biological knowledge is believed to have been a major contributing factor. In early May 2013, an exotic ant species, Lepisiota frauenfeldi , was found for the first time in Australia. Identifying the species proved difficult, and little biological information about the species was available. In making the decision to eradicate and develop the treatment protocols, four assumptions were made about the ant’s biology. Here we detail rapid and basic research that was used to assess the assumptions underpinning the decision to eradicate, contribute to determine some eradication protocols for this understudied species, as well as how our understanding increased following the discovery of two other incursions of this species in Australia. The research found that all initial assumptions of the ant’s biology used in the original eradication plan were wrong. Distribution modelling found the ant could potentially inhabit a larger area than first thought, and updating the model with the subsequent incursions greatly increased the area of suitable climate in Australia. The ant’s foraging and reproductive regimes were not as expected, so too its nutrition pathways to queens, which had implications for the treatments. Our work serves as a clear warning for invasive species practitioners that management decisions that are based on assumptions, “gut feelings” or knowledge based on information from elsewhere in the world, or from other species, can be expected to be flawed. Rapid, small-scale and strategic research conducted on-site can enhance management outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Management of Biological Invasions, established in 2010 by Dr. Elias Dana, is an open access, peer-reviewed international journal focusing on applied research in biological invasions in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems from around the world. This journal is devoted to bridging the gap between scientific research and the use of science in decision-making, regulation and management in the area of invasive species introduction and biodiversity conservation.
Managing biological invasions is a crisis science, with Management of Biological Invasions aiming to provide insights to the issues, to document new forms of detection, measurements and analysis, and to document tangible solutions to this problem.
In addition to original research on applied issues, Management of Biological Invasions publishes technical reports on new management technologies of invasive species and also the proceedings of relevant international meetings. As a platform to encourage informed discussion on matters of national and international importance, we publish viewpoint papers that highlight emerging issues, showcase initiatives, and present opinions of leading researchers.