Using structured decision making to evaluate potential management responses to detection of dreissenid mussel (Dreissena spp.) environmental DNA

IF 1.5 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
A. Sepulveda, David K. Smith, K. O'Donnell, Nathan Owens, B. White, C. Richter, C. Merkes, Skylar L. Wolf, M. Rau, Matthew E. Neilson, Wesley M. Daniel, Christine E. Dumoulin, M. Hunter
{"title":"Using structured decision making to evaluate potential management responses to detection of dreissenid mussel (Dreissena spp.) environmental DNA","authors":"A. Sepulveda, David K. Smith, K. O'Donnell, Nathan Owens, B. White, C. Richter, C. Merkes, Skylar L. Wolf, M. Rau, Matthew E. Neilson, Wesley M. Daniel, Christine E. Dumoulin, M. Hunter","doi":"10.3391/mbi.2022.13.2.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Environmental (e)DNA tools are sensitive and cost-effective for early detection of invasive species. However, the uncertainty associated with the interpretation of positive eDNA detections makes it challenging to determine appropriate natural resource management responses. Multiple sources of error can give rise to positive detections of eDNA in a sample when individuals of that species are not present at the site or a widespread infestation is not imminent. Acting on an erroneous eDNA inference could result in needless costs or reductions in desirable resources. Alternatively, failure to rapidly act on eDNA results that truly indicate invader presence could compound negative impacts and lead to high, long-term costs to manage infestations. We used a structured decision making (SDM) process, which incorporates tradeoffs and uncertainties, to evaluate appropriate response actions following hypothetical eDNA detections of invasive dreissenid mussel (Dreissena spp.) eDNA in Jordanelle Reservoir, Utah (USA). We worked with decision-makers and stakeholders to identify objectives and discrete management action alternatives to assess consequences and tradeoffs. Alternatives ranged from no action to intensive and expensive control efforts. The best performing alternative was delayed containment described by immediate attempts to confirm the eDNA detections using nonmolecular sampling techniques followed by mandatory watercraft exit inspections to prevent dreissenid mussel spread to regional water bodies. Non-molecular sampling increased public support for management by demonstrating a commitment to monitor the invasion state before action, whereas containment decreased likelihood of regional spread to other waters. Delayed containment had the lowest downside risk, and the highest upside gains relative to other alternative actions. Sensitivity analyses showed our results to be robust to parameter and outcome uncertainty.","PeriodicalId":54262,"journal":{"name":"Management of Biological Invasions","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management of Biological Invasions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3391/mbi.2022.13.2.06","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Environmental (e)DNA tools are sensitive and cost-effective for early detection of invasive species. However, the uncertainty associated with the interpretation of positive eDNA detections makes it challenging to determine appropriate natural resource management responses. Multiple sources of error can give rise to positive detections of eDNA in a sample when individuals of that species are not present at the site or a widespread infestation is not imminent. Acting on an erroneous eDNA inference could result in needless costs or reductions in desirable resources. Alternatively, failure to rapidly act on eDNA results that truly indicate invader presence could compound negative impacts and lead to high, long-term costs to manage infestations. We used a structured decision making (SDM) process, which incorporates tradeoffs and uncertainties, to evaluate appropriate response actions following hypothetical eDNA detections of invasive dreissenid mussel (Dreissena spp.) eDNA in Jordanelle Reservoir, Utah (USA). We worked with decision-makers and stakeholders to identify objectives and discrete management action alternatives to assess consequences and tradeoffs. Alternatives ranged from no action to intensive and expensive control efforts. The best performing alternative was delayed containment described by immediate attempts to confirm the eDNA detections using nonmolecular sampling techniques followed by mandatory watercraft exit inspections to prevent dreissenid mussel spread to regional water bodies. Non-molecular sampling increased public support for management by demonstrating a commitment to monitor the invasion state before action, whereas containment decreased likelihood of regional spread to other waters. Delayed containment had the lowest downside risk, and the highest upside gains relative to other alternative actions. Sensitivity analyses showed our results to be robust to parameter and outcome uncertainty.
利用结构化决策来评估对贻贝(Dreissena spp.)环境DNA检测的潜在管理反应
环境(e)DNA工具对于早期发现入侵物种是敏感和经济的。然而,与阳性eDNA检测解释相关的不确定性使得确定适当的自然资源管理响应具有挑战性。当该物种的个体不存在于现场或广泛的侵扰不是迫在眉睫时,多个错误来源可能导致样品中eDNA的阳性检测。根据错误的eDNA推断采取行动可能导致不必要的成本或所需资源的减少。另外,如果不能迅速对真正表明入侵者存在的eDNA结果采取行动,可能会加剧负面影响,并导致管理侵染的高额长期成本。我们使用了结构化决策(SDM)过程,其中包含权衡和不确定性,以评估在美国犹他州Jordanelle水库入侵贻贝(Dreissena spp.) eDNA检测后的适当反应行动。我们与决策者和利益相关者合作,确定目标和离散的管理行动方案,以评估后果和权衡。其他选择包括不采取行动到密集和昂贵的控制努力。效果最好的替代方案是延迟遏制,即立即尝试使用非分子取样技术确认eDNA检测结果,然后进行强制性船舶出口检查,以防止德雷森贻贝扩散到区域水体。非分子取样增加了公众对管理的支持,表明了在采取行动前监测入侵状态的承诺,而遏制则降低了区域扩散到其他水域的可能性。与其他替代措施相比,延迟遏制措施的下行风险最低,而上行收益最高。敏感性分析表明,我们的结果对参数和结果的不确定性具有鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Management of Biological Invasions
Management of Biological Invasions Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
21
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Management of Biological Invasions, established in 2010 by Dr. Elias Dana, is an open access, peer-reviewed international journal focusing on applied research in biological invasions in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems from around the world. This journal is devoted to bridging the gap between scientific research and the use of science in decision-making, regulation and management in the area of invasive species introduction and biodiversity conservation. Managing biological invasions is a crisis science, with Management of Biological Invasions aiming to provide insights to the issues, to document new forms of detection, measurements and analysis, and to document tangible solutions to this problem. In addition to original research on applied issues, Management of Biological Invasions publishes technical reports on new management technologies of invasive species and also the proceedings of relevant international meetings. As a platform to encourage informed discussion on matters of national and international importance, we publish viewpoint papers that highlight emerging issues, showcase initiatives, and present opinions of leading researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信