Man Cannot Change His Nature

A. Tsipko
{"title":"Man Cannot Change His Nature","authors":"A. Tsipko","doi":"10.2753/RSP1061-1967290127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why has the human factor been brought up?: I honestly cannot understand why many of our philosophers have for so long resisted placing the concept of the \"human factor\" in scholarly circulation. Of course, the conjunction of the words \"human\" and \"factor\" is unfamiliar. The ABCs of humanism teach that man cannot be a means, i.e., a \"factor,\" that he is an end in himself and enjoys moral and spiritual autonomy. But to anyone willing to see and to hear, it has been clear from the outset that this is a special, even an exceptional case. For the first time in many years this awkward combination of words presented the possibility of reflecting on the principal lessons of our socialist history, of recalling those seminal truths of social existence that we have neglected.","PeriodicalId":85576,"journal":{"name":"Soviet studies in philosophy","volume":"32 1","pages":"7-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/RSP1061-1967290127","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soviet studies in philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-1967290127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Why has the human factor been brought up?: I honestly cannot understand why many of our philosophers have for so long resisted placing the concept of the "human factor" in scholarly circulation. Of course, the conjunction of the words "human" and "factor" is unfamiliar. The ABCs of humanism teach that man cannot be a means, i.e., a "factor," that he is an end in himself and enjoys moral and spiritual autonomy. But to anyone willing to see and to hear, it has been clear from the outset that this is a special, even an exceptional case. For the first time in many years this awkward combination of words presented the possibility of reflecting on the principal lessons of our socialist history, of recalling those seminal truths of social existence that we have neglected.
人不能改变本性
人为因素为什么会被提出来?老实说,我不明白为什么我们的许多哲学家这么长时间以来一直拒绝将“人为因素”的概念纳入学术流通。当然,“人”和“因素”这两个词的连词并不熟悉。人文主义的abc教导我们,人不可能是一种手段,即一个“因素”,人本身就是目的,享有道德和精神上的自主权。但对于任何愿意看到和听到的人来说,从一开始就很清楚,这是一个特殊的,甚至是一个例外的案例。这么多年来,这种尴尬的词语组合第一次使我们有可能反思我们社会主义历史的主要教训,回想起那些被我们所忽视的社会存在的重要真理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信