The Dialectics of Good and Evil as the Main Problem of Philosophical-Ethical Cognition

L. M. Arkhangel'skii
{"title":"The Dialectics of Good and Evil as the Main Problem of Philosophical-Ethical Cognition","authors":"L. M. Arkhangel'skii","doi":"10.2753/RSP1061-1967220454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Good and evil are the most general ethical categories from which we can get our bearings in the fundamental philosophical and normative problems of ethics. In the contemporary scholarly literature the interpretation of the good is multifunctional. Good is regarded as a model (at its preeminent level, as an ideal) of morality, as the most general moral requirement or most general moral evaluation, and finally as a practical norm, i.e., a requirement embodied in moral experience, as a unity of the objective and subjective in moral actions. The history of ethical thought was bound to reach this broad, all-embracing conception of the good, indeed, that was the way it went, mastering the content of the category of the good, bit by bit, focusing attention now on one, now on another of its aspects. Hence the most general explanation of the good as a synonym for morality (even taking into account the variations in its historically specific sense) has not at all been the same throughout the different stages in the...","PeriodicalId":85576,"journal":{"name":"Soviet studies in philosophy","volume":"22 1","pages":"54-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1984-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2753/RSP1061-1967220454","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soviet studies in philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2753/RSP1061-1967220454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Good and evil are the most general ethical categories from which we can get our bearings in the fundamental philosophical and normative problems of ethics. In the contemporary scholarly literature the interpretation of the good is multifunctional. Good is regarded as a model (at its preeminent level, as an ideal) of morality, as the most general moral requirement or most general moral evaluation, and finally as a practical norm, i.e., a requirement embodied in moral experience, as a unity of the objective and subjective in moral actions. The history of ethical thought was bound to reach this broad, all-embracing conception of the good, indeed, that was the way it went, mastering the content of the category of the good, bit by bit, focusing attention now on one, now on another of its aspects. Hence the most general explanation of the good as a synonym for morality (even taking into account the variations in its historically specific sense) has not at all been the same throughout the different stages in the...
善与恶的辩证法:哲学伦理认识的主要问题
善与恶是最普遍的伦理范畴,从中我们可以在伦理学的基本哲学和规范问题中找到我们的定位。在当代学术文献中,对善的解释是多功能的。善被视为道德的典范(在其卓越的层面上,作为一种理想),被视为最普遍的道德要求或最普遍的道德评价,并最终被视为一种实践规范,即体现在道德经验中的要求,被视为道德行为中客观和主观的统一。伦理思想史必然要达到这一广泛的、包罗万象的善的概念,的确,这就是它的发展方向,它一点一点地掌握善的范畴的内容,时而注意它的这个方面,时而注意它的那个方面。因此,对善作为道德的同义词的最普遍的解释(即使考虑到其历史特定意义的变化)在历史的不同阶段根本不是相同的……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信