ENERGY MINIMIZATION OF HYDROGEN PRODUCTION VIA BUTANOL STEAM REFORMING

IF 0.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
G. Pinto, C. Sotomonte, João Pereira, M. Francisco, Túlio de Souza, A. Julio, B. Bunya, Christian J. R. Coronado, J. Palácio, Guilherme Gomes
{"title":"ENERGY MINIMIZATION OF HYDROGEN PRODUCTION VIA BUTANOL STEAM REFORMING","authors":"G. Pinto, C. Sotomonte, João Pereira, M. Francisco, Túlio de Souza, A. Julio, B. Bunya, Christian J. R. Coronado, J. Palácio, Guilherme Gomes","doi":"10.30638/eemj.2023.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Steam reforming is currently the most common process for hydrogen production, but its use is mainly limited to fossil-based fuels such as natural gas. In an effort to diversify the hydrogen matrix, alternative sources have been considered, among which butanol appears as a potentially renewable source. The present study provides a detailed thermodynamic discussion about the operational parameters influencing hydrogen yield and heat consumption in an Aspen Plus® simulated cycle. The effect of key operational variables over hydrogen yield and heat duty was initially assessed through Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and later optimized with the Multi-Objective Lichtenberg Algorithm (MOLA). Results indicated that, for most of the operational range, reducing the steam/butanol molar ratio had a stronger influence on decreasing the heat duty required for optimal hydrogen production. The optimal temperature was kept at 800 °C even after the steam molar ratio reached lower values (4-4.5 mol/mol). At high temperatures and steam ratios, higher water gas shift temperatures were more efficient because they avoided unnecessary heat removal, despite losses in hydrogen production due to chemical equilibrium. The Pareto also presented a nearly vertical region, which indicated that hydrogen yield could not be significantly increased after 94.4%.","PeriodicalId":11685,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Engineering and Management Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Engineering and Management Journal","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2023.045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Steam reforming is currently the most common process for hydrogen production, but its use is mainly limited to fossil-based fuels such as natural gas. In an effort to diversify the hydrogen matrix, alternative sources have been considered, among which butanol appears as a potentially renewable source. The present study provides a detailed thermodynamic discussion about the operational parameters influencing hydrogen yield and heat consumption in an Aspen Plus® simulated cycle. The effect of key operational variables over hydrogen yield and heat duty was initially assessed through Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and later optimized with the Multi-Objective Lichtenberg Algorithm (MOLA). Results indicated that, for most of the operational range, reducing the steam/butanol molar ratio had a stronger influence on decreasing the heat duty required for optimal hydrogen production. The optimal temperature was kept at 800 °C even after the steam molar ratio reached lower values (4-4.5 mol/mol). At high temperatures and steam ratios, higher water gas shift temperatures were more efficient because they avoided unnecessary heat removal, despite losses in hydrogen production due to chemical equilibrium. The Pareto also presented a nearly vertical region, which indicated that hydrogen yield could not be significantly increased after 94.4%.
丁醇蒸汽重整制氢的能源最小化
蒸汽重整是目前最常见的制氢工艺,但其用途主要限于天然气等化石燃料。为了使氢基质多样化,已经考虑了替代来源,其中丁醇似乎是一种潜在的可再生来源。本研究对Aspen Plus®模拟循环中影响氢气产率和热消耗的操作参数进行了详细的热力学讨论。关键操作变量对氢气产率和热负荷的影响最初通过响应面法(RSM)进行评估,随后使用多目标Lichtenberg算法(MOLA)进行优化。结果表明,在大多数操作范围内,降低蒸汽/丁醇摩尔比对降低最佳产氢所需的热负荷有更大的影响。当蒸汽摩尔比达到较低值(4 ~ 4.5 mol/mol)时,最佳温度保持在800℃。在高温和蒸汽比较高的情况下,较高的水气转换温度更有效,因为它们避免了不必要的热量排出,尽管化学平衡会导致氢气生产损失。Pareto也呈现出近似垂直的区域,表明在94.4%之后,产氢率不会显著提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8.6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Engineering and Management Journal is an international journal that publishes reviewed original research papers of both experimental and theoretical nature in the following areas: environmental impact assessment; environmental integrated management; risk assessment and management; environmental chemistry; environmental protection technologies (water, air, soil); pollution reduction at source and waste minimization; chemical and biological process engineering; cleaner production, products and services; sensors in environment control; sources of radiation and protection technologies; waste valorization technologies and management; environmental biotechnology; energy and environment; modelling, simulation and optimization for environmental protection; technologies for drinking and industrial water; life cycle assessments of products; environmental strategies and policies; cost-profitt analysis in environmental protection; eco-industry and environmental market; environmental education and sustainable development. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal will publish: original communications describing important new discoveries or further developments in the above-mentioned topics; reviews, mainly of new rapidly developing areas of environmental protection; special themed issues on relevant topics; advertising.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信